Efficacy of Abciximab Bolus Only Regimen in Providing Inhibition of Platelet Action Over Time

NCT ID: NCT00929279

Last Updated: 2009-06-29

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: PHASE4
• Total Enrollment: 73 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2008-11-30
• Study Completion Date: 2009-05-31

Brief Summary

In full responders to clopidogrel scheduled to undergo PCI for NSTEACS, the use of abciximab bolus only plus 600 mg clopidogrel loading dose will result in a non-inferior inhibition of platelet aggregation after 4 hours as measured by LTA (20micromol ADP) when compared with abciximab plus infusion and 300 mg clopidogrel loading dose.

Detailed Description

Based on the outcome of the EPIC trial, and the sub-optimal results with a single abciximab bolus compared with bolus and infusion, it was recommended to prolong platelet inhibition by a 12h infusion of abciximab after the initial bolus administration in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, lower outcomes in the single bolus group in the EPIC study were entirely driven by the rates of urgent repeat revascularization at 30 days (3•6 percent bolus group versus 0•8 percent bolus and infusion group, p < 0.001), a complication probably related to the lack of stent use at that time. Importantly, there was no significant difference in terms of death or myocardial infarction (MI). Moreover, the use of clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary stenting may currently reduce the need for infusion after a single abciximab bolus and it is likely that the soon to come availably of even more potent oral thienopyridines with faster onset of action such as prasugrel may further contribute to make post-bolus abciximab infusion of marginal clinical benefit. Yet, it is known that infusion, as compared to bolus only regimen increases the bleeding rate and the incidence of thrombocytopenia. Thus, bolus only regimen has the potential to maintain protection from ischemic complications in patients undergoing PCI while optimizing the safety profile of the treatment in the current era of intervention based on stents and thienopyridines with fast onset of action.

The CLEAR-PLATELETS study has recently shown that 600 mg clopidogrel does not affect the degree of platelet inhibition throughout infusion of eptifibatide, which is consistent with the notion that glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition at steady state leads to near maximal platelet blockade. No study has so far investigated the effect of clopidogrel, given at high loading dose, in patients treated with abciximab bolus only. In particular, it is not known whether the administration of clopidogrel at high loading dose may prolong the effect of abciximab bolus on the degree of platelet inhibition and if so at which time point the combination of abciximab bolus and clopidogrel may become suboptimal in terms of platelet inhibition as compared to currently recommended 12h infusion of abciximab after the initial bolus administration. This information would lead to relevant clinical implications as it may define the time frame for a safe and effective intervention after bolus only of abciximab in current practice.

This is a single-centre, double-blind prospective randomized pharmacodynamic investigation of 2 antiplatelet regimens in patients undergoing coronary stenting for non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTECACS):

1. Abciximab bolus followed by infusion plus on-label clopidogrel administration at 300 mg loading dose.

2. abciximab bolus without infusion plus high loading dose of clopidogrel at 600 mg

The objective of the investigation is to test the hypothesis that the administration of abciximab bolus only plus high loading dose of clopidogrel at 600 mg will provide a non inferior level of inhibition of platelet aggregation 4 hours after administration as compared to abciximab bolus followed by standard infusion in combination with clopidogrel loading dose of 300 mg in patients with normal response to clopidogrel (as evaluated after 14-30 days).

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: QUADRUPLE

Study Groups

Abciximab bolus plus infusion

Abciximab bolus of 0.25mg /Kg, followed by a 12-h infusion 0.125 microg/Kg/min (to a maximum of 10 µg/min) and immediate clopidogrel at 300 mg loading regimen.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

bolus+infusion

Intervention Type: DRUG

Abciximab bolus of 0.25mg /Kg, followed by a 12-h infusion 0.125 microg/Kg/min (to a maximum of 10 µg/min) and immediate clopidogrel at 300 mg loading regimen

bolus only regimen

Abciximab bolus of 0.25mg /Kg followed by placebo infusion and immediate clopidogrel at 600 mg loading dose

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

abciximab bolus only regimen

Intervention Type: DRUG

Abciximab bolus of 0.25mg /Kg followed by placebo infusion and immediate clopidogrel at 600 mg loading dose

Interventions

bolus+infusion

Abciximab bolus of 0.25mg /Kg, followed by a 12-h infusion 0.125 microg/Kg/min (to a maximum of 10 µg/min) and immediate clopidogrel at 300 mg loading regimen

Intervention Type: DRUG

abciximab bolus only regimen

Abciximab bolus of 0.25mg /Kg followed by placebo infusion and immediate clopidogrel at 600 mg loading dose

Intervention Type: DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Both of the following:

• Age >18 years
• Symptoms of ischemia that were increasing or occurred at rest, with the last episode occurring no more than 24 hours before randomization;

AND at least one of the following:

• An elevated cardiac troponin T level (≥0.015 μg per liter);
• The presence of ischemic changes as assessed by electrocardiography (defined as ST-segment depression or transient ST-segment elevation exceeding 0.05 mV, or T-wave inversion of ≥0.2 mV in two contiguous leads)
• A documented history of coronary artery disease as evidenced by previous myocardial infarction, findings on previous coronary angiography, or a positive exercise test.

Exclusion Criteria

• administration of fibrinolytic or any GP IIb IIIa inhibitors for the treatment of current AMI or within 1 month before it
• history of bleeding diathesis
• known sensitivity to abciximab, to any component of the product or to murine monoclonal antibodies
• major surgery or trauma within 30 days
• active bleeding
• previous stroke in the last six months
• oral anticoagulant therapy
• pre-existing thrombocytopenia;
• vasculitis;
• hypertensive retinopathy;
• severe hepatic failure,
• severe renal failure requiring haemodialysis
• documented allergy/intolerance or contraindication to clopidogrel or inability to assume clopidogrel on a consecutive daily basis for a minimum of 30 days, or to heparin or aspirin
• uncontrolled hypertension (systolic or diastolic arterial pressure >180 mmHg or 120, respectively, despite medical therapy)
• limited life expectancy, e.g. neoplasms, others
• inability to obtain informed consent
• pregnancy.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Università degli Studi di Ferrara

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara

Locations

Institue of Cardiology, University of Ferrara

Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

Countries

Italy

References

Valgimigli M, Campo G, Tebaldi M, Monti M, Gambetti S, Scalone A, Parrinello G, Ferrari R; Fabolus Synchro (facilitation through abciximab by dropping infusion Line in patients undergoing coronary stenting. Synergy with clopidogrel at high loading dose regimen) Investigators. Randomized, double-blind comparison of effects of abiciximab bolus only vs. on-label regimen on ex vivo inhibition of platelet aggregation in responders to clopidogrel undergoing coronary stenting. J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Sep;8(9):1903-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03972.x.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 20586923 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

FAS-07-I

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id