Impact of C-arm CT in Patients With HCC Undergoing TACE: Optimal Imaging Guidance
NCT ID: NCT00926536
Last Updated: 2016-04-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
84 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-04-30
2010-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Postoperative TACE(Transhepatic Arterial Chemotherapy And Embolization) for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02109146
Assessment of Liver Cancer Response to TACE Using MultiHance-Enhanced MRI.
NCT00539253
Adjuvant Radiotherapy Comparing TACE for Curative HCC
NCT02125396
A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Transcatheter Arterial Pegylated Interferon Embolization (TAIE) for Liver Cancer
NCT00563095
Decrease in Circulating Tumour Cell Count Reflects the Effectiveness of Postoperative Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) in Preventing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence
NCT02032368
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Sensitivity and specificity to diagnose additional tumors and its impact on transplantation criteria.
2. The ability to decrease procedural time by aiding navigation through complex arterial anatomy.
3. Impact on radiation dose. Although the patient would receive the radiation during C-arm CT, overall the number of DSA angiograms and fluroscopy may decrease, potentially negating any effect of the additional dose from C-arm CT
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
C-arm CT + DSA as needed'
In the group of subjects randomized in this group, the image guidance component of the procedure will be conducted by the acquisition of 3D CT-like images during a trans-hepatic arterial injection of iodinated contrast agent for road mapping the tumor feeding vessels and supplemented by DSA as needed by the operating physician as imaging guidance for planning tumor(s) treatment approach.
C-arm CT + DSA as needed
C-arm CT images obtained and supplemented with DSA if needed
DSA only
In the group of subjects randomized in this group, present standard of care, i.e DSA imaging only will be used by the operating physician to map out the tumor vessels and used for treatment approach. Additional 3D CT-like images will be obtained, but only used if the operator cannot perform adequate planning using DSA alone.
DSA only
DSA imaging only
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
C-arm CT + DSA as needed
C-arm CT images obtained and supplemented with DSA if needed
DSA only
DSA imaging only
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Patients must be 18 years old or older
Patients must have received an abdominal CT, PET/CT scan or MRI, completed prior to the TACE procedure.
Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
Exclusion Criteria
Pregnant women
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc
INDUSTRY
Stanford University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nishita Kothary
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dr. Rebecca Fahrig
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Stanford University
Nishita N. Kothary
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Stanford University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SU-05122009-2518
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
HEP0020
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB-15849
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.