Effectiveness of the Rapid Intravascular Start (RIVS) System Versus Conventional Catheter

NCT ID: NCT00914069

Last Updated: 2017-04-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

175 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-06-30

Study Completion Date

2013-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study will test a hypothesis that the RIVS system will have a higher rate of successful first PIV placement compared to conventional catheter without a significant increase in complications and time of procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The hypothesis to be statistically tested was that the RIVS system will have a higher rate of successful first attempt peripheral intravenous placement success as compared to conventional peripheral intravenous catheters without a significant increase in device related complications and procedure time.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vascular Access Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RIVS vascular access

RIVS vascular access

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

RIVS vascular access

Intervention Type DEVICE

Access to peripheral vasculature

Conventional vascular access

Conventional vascular access

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional vascular access

Intervention Type DEVICE

Vascular access using conventional venous access device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RIVS vascular access

Access to peripheral vasculature

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional vascular access

Vascular access using conventional venous access device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any type of oncology patients undergoing chemotherapy or post-chemotherapy (without a port/cannula), or over 65 years
* Requires peripheral IV as determined by examining physician
* Requires the IV when a study nurse or resident is available
* Able to sign an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Active systemic or cutaneous infection or inflammation;
* Pre-existing immunodeficiency disorder and/or chronic use of systemic steroids;
* Known, significant history of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, von Willebrand's disease or current platelet count \< 100,000 cells/mm3, baseline International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≥1.8, or fibrinogen level less than 150 mg/dl (if received a fibrinolytic agent within prior 24 hours);
* Currently involved in any other investigational clinical trials;
* Previous vascular grafts or surgery at the target vessel access site;
* Females who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant within 3 months of the procedure, or lactating;
* Central line available
* Requirement for immediate IV placement (patient's condition would potentially be compromised if there is a time delay in IV placement)
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

C. R. Bard

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeffrey S Stuart, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington Outpatient Surgery Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Washington Outpatient Surgery Center

Fremont, California, United States

Site Status

St. Vincent's Medical Center

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

University Hospital Case Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

62009123

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RIPT Feasibility Trial
NCT03070834 COMPLETED NA
Safe-Infusion Study
NCT06727240 RECRUITING NA