Lidocaine Patch 5% Versus Celecoxib 200 mg in Chronic Axial Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT00904397
Last Updated: 2010-02-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
98 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study Comparing The Efficacy And Safety Of Lidocaine 5% Patch With Placebo In Patients With Chronic Axial Low Back Pain
NCT00904111
Pilot Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lidoderm Patch in the Treatment of Low Back Pain
NCT00904475
Topical Lidocaine Patch in Low Back Pain
NCT00904540
Efficacy and Safety Study of Celecoxib and Pregabalin Compared With Celecoxib Monotherapy, in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Having a Neuropathic Component
NCT01838044
Etodolac-Lidocaine Patch in the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain
NCT01968005
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lidoderm
Lidocaine patch 5% (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.), 2 patches applied once daily (q24h) directly to the most painful area of the low back
Lidoderm®
Patients participated in a 14-day washout period followed by a 12-week active treatment period. Eligible patients were randomized equally to one of two groups: lidocaine patch 5% or celecoxib 200 mg.
Celecoxib
Celecoxib (Celebrex®, G.D. Searle \& Co., Chicago, IL), one 200 mg oral capsule QD
Celecoxib
Patients participated in a 14-day washout period followed by a 12-week active treatment period. Eligible patients were randomized equally to one of two groups: lidocaine patch 5% or celecoxib 200 mg.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lidoderm®
Patients participated in a 14-day washout period followed by a 12-week active treatment period. Eligible patients were randomized equally to one of two groups: lidocaine patch 5% or celecoxib 200 mg.
Celecoxib
Patients participated in a 14-day washout period followed by a 12-week active treatment period. Eligible patients were randomized equally to one of two groups: lidocaine patch 5% or celecoxib 200 mg.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Chronic axial LBP without radiation: pain isolated to the axial low back without radiation into the buttock or below
* Chronic axial LBP with radiation: pain that radiated to the buttock or below. This patient group could include patients with radicular/neuropathic and non-radicular components with leg pain component \<50%
2. Had daily moderate to severe LBP as the primary source of pain
3. Had a normal neurological examination, including:
* Motor strength
* Sensory exam in lower extremities
* Deep tendon reflexes
4. Had a normal 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) without any clinically significant abnormalities in heart rate, rhythm, or conduction
5. Had discontinued use of all analgesic medications (including over-the-counter \[OTC\] analgesics), glucosamine, and chondroitin prior to randomization (patients were allowed limited use of analgesic medications for indications other than non-study pain
6. At the baseline visit, patients were randomized to active treatment if they had an average daily pain intensity score of 5 or greater (on a 0 to 10 scale) for at least 3 days out of the 5 consecutive days immediately prior to the baseline visit; 0 was defined as "no pain" and 10 was defined as "pain as bad as ever imagined" as measured by Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and recorded in a diary
Exclusion Criteria
2. Had any other chronic pain condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with patient assessment of LBP relief
3. Had a history of one or more back surgeries within 1 year of study entry
4. Had a moderate or greater hepatic impairment
5. Had a severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance of \<30 mL/min)
6. Had experienced asthma, urticaria, or allergic-type reactions after taking aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
7. Had a prior history of peptic ulcer disease and/or gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding
8. Were taking analgesic medications that could not be discontinued during the study. Patients taking these medications prior to the study were required to discontinue use for the duration of the study. Patients using opioid analgesics at study entry were required to taper off these medications.
9. Were taking long-acting opioids or opioids that could not be discontinued over the first 5 days of the washout period
10. Were receiving fluconazole or lithium (secondary to drug-drug-interaction risks with celecoxib)
11. Had received an epidural steroid/local anesthetic injection within 4 weeks prior to study entry
12. Had received trigger point injections within 2 weeks prior to study entry
13. Had received Botulinum Toxin (Botox) injections for LBP within 6 months prior to study entry
14. Were using a lidocaine-containing product that cannot be discontinued during the study
15. Were using any topical medication applied to the low back region
16. Had previously failed treatment with Lidoderm analgesic patch for LBP
17. Had previously failed treatment with celecoxib or with any two COX-2 specific inhibitors other than celecoxib
18. Were taking class I anti-arrhythmic (e.g. mexiletine, tocainide)
19. Had a history of alcohol or substance abuse within the last 3 years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Endo Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sr. Director
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Endo Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northport, Alabama, United States
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Encinitas, California, United States
San Diego, California, United States
Spring Valley, California, United States
Longwood, Florida, United States
North Miami Beach, Florida, United States
Plantation, Florida, United States
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Berlin, New Jersey, United States
Bethpage, New York, United States
Tonawanda, New York, United States
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
Sellersville, Pennsylvania, United States
Greer, South Carolina, United States
Spokane, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EN3220-013
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.