Lidocaine Patch 5% Versus Celecoxib 200 mg in Chronic Axial Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT00904397

Last Updated: 2010-02-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

98 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients who had axial lower back pain (LBP) with or without radiation present for at least 3 months and had daily moderate to severe LBP as the primary source of pain participated in a Phase IV clinical trial to assess the efficacy of lidocaine patch 5% compared to celecoxib 200 mg in treating chronic axial LBP with and without radiation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lidoderm

Lidocaine patch 5% (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.), 2 patches applied once daily (q24h) directly to the most painful area of the low back

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lidoderm®

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients participated in a 14-day washout period followed by a 12-week active treatment period. Eligible patients were randomized equally to one of two groups: lidocaine patch 5% or celecoxib 200 mg.

Celecoxib

Celecoxib (Celebrex®, G.D. Searle \& Co., Chicago, IL), one 200 mg oral capsule QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Celecoxib

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients participated in a 14-day washout period followed by a 12-week active treatment period. Eligible patients were randomized equally to one of two groups: lidocaine patch 5% or celecoxib 200 mg.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lidoderm®

Patients participated in a 14-day washout period followed by a 12-week active treatment period. Eligible patients were randomized equally to one of two groups: lidocaine patch 5% or celecoxib 200 mg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Celecoxib

Patients participated in a 14-day washout period followed by a 12-week active treatment period. Eligible patients were randomized equally to one of two groups: lidocaine patch 5% or celecoxib 200 mg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lidocaine patch 5%

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Had axial LBP with or without radiation present for at least 3 months as defined below:

* Chronic axial LBP without radiation: pain isolated to the axial low back without radiation into the buttock or below
* Chronic axial LBP with radiation: pain that radiated to the buttock or below. This patient group could include patients with radicular/neuropathic and non-radicular components with leg pain component \<50%
2. Had daily moderate to severe LBP as the primary source of pain
3. Had a normal neurological examination, including:

* Motor strength
* Sensory exam in lower extremities
* Deep tendon reflexes
4. Had a normal 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) without any clinically significant abnormalities in heart rate, rhythm, or conduction
5. Had discontinued use of all analgesic medications (including over-the-counter \[OTC\] analgesics), glucosamine, and chondroitin prior to randomization (patients were allowed limited use of analgesic medications for indications other than non-study pain
6. At the baseline visit, patients were randomized to active treatment if they had an average daily pain intensity score of 5 or greater (on a 0 to 10 scale) for at least 3 days out of the 5 consecutive days immediately prior to the baseline visit; 0 was defined as "no pain" and 10 was defined as "pain as bad as ever imagined" as measured by Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and recorded in a diary

Exclusion Criteria

1. Had spinal stenosis with \>50% leg pain component
2. Had any other chronic pain condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with patient assessment of LBP relief
3. Had a history of one or more back surgeries within 1 year of study entry
4. Had a moderate or greater hepatic impairment
5. Had a severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance of \<30 mL/min)
6. Had experienced asthma, urticaria, or allergic-type reactions after taking aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
7. Had a prior history of peptic ulcer disease and/or gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding
8. Were taking analgesic medications that could not be discontinued during the study. Patients taking these medications prior to the study were required to discontinue use for the duration of the study. Patients using opioid analgesics at study entry were required to taper off these medications.
9. Were taking long-acting opioids or opioids that could not be discontinued over the first 5 days of the washout period
10. Were receiving fluconazole or lithium (secondary to drug-drug-interaction risks with celecoxib)
11. Had received an epidural steroid/local anesthetic injection within 4 weeks prior to study entry
12. Had received trigger point injections within 2 weeks prior to study entry
13. Had received Botulinum Toxin (Botox) injections for LBP within 6 months prior to study entry
14. Were using a lidocaine-containing product that cannot be discontinued during the study
15. Were using any topical medication applied to the low back region
16. Had previously failed treatment with Lidoderm analgesic patch for LBP
17. Had previously failed treatment with celecoxib or with any two COX-2 specific inhibitors other than celecoxib
18. Were taking class I anti-arrhythmic (e.g. mexiletine, tocainide)
19. Had a history of alcohol or substance abuse within the last 3 years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Endo Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sr. Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Endo Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northport, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Encinitas, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Spring Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Longwood, Florida, United States

Site Status

North Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Berlin, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Bethpage, New York, United States

Site Status

Tonawanda, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Sellersville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EN3220-013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.