Reactions to Contrast Media (CM) Administered at the Time of the Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

NCT ID: NCT00900640

Last Updated: 2017-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

27 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-05-31

Study Completion Date

2017-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to prospectively document the incidence of CM adverse reactions at the time of ERCP and to determine whether various perceived risk factors are predictive of adverse reaction.

Adverse reactions to iodine containing contrast media (CM) have been described after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) but have been difficult to study due to their extremely low incidence. Adverse reactions can be classified by severity (mild, moderate or severe) or underlying mechanism (idiosyncratic versus nonidiosyncratic). Nonidiosyncratic reactions are related to the dose and osmolality of the CM; these are not observed during ERCP due to the relative small amount of systemic absorption of CM. Idiosyncratic reactions on the other hand are not dose-dependent and generally occur shortly after administration of CM.

Premedication with corticosteroids, H1/H2 -blockers and the use of low osmolality CM is beneficial in preventing nonidiosyncratic reactions during intravascular administration. However their role in during ERCP is unclear as CM is not injected into the intravascular space. Currently there are no formal recommendations and clinical practice varies considerably. The general purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of CM reactions during ERCP and to determine whether various risk factors are predictive of idiosyncratic reactions. Based on these results, we hope to develop guidelines for the use of prophylaxis to prevent CM reactions in ERCP.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Contrast Allergies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ERCP group

All patients who have been scheduled for an ERCP due to medical necessity will be considered for this study.

ERCP as medically indicated by subjects referring physician

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Determine the incidence of adverse reactions to CM administered during ERCP in patients with prior reaction to IV CM administration and/or shellfish allergy.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ERCP as medically indicated by subjects referring physician

Determine the incidence of adverse reactions to CM administered during ERCP in patients with prior reaction to IV CM administration and/or shellfish allergy.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18 years or older.
2. Scheduled to undergo ERCP at the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
3. History of prior reaction to IV CM and/or shellfish allergy
4. Subject must be able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Any contraindication to performing ERCP.
2. Participation in another research protocol that could interfere or influence the outcomes measures of the present study.
3. The subject is unable/unwilling to give informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter V. Draganov, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Florida

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shands UF endoscopy Center

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ERCP Contrast 144-09

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Elastography in Liver Cell Failure
NCT06089785 NOT_YET_RECRUITING