Initiating Transdermal Estradiol Therapy in Turner's Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT00870220
Last Updated: 2014-03-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE1
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-04-30
2011-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The specific hypotheses to be tested are: when combined with growth hormone (GH) treatment, low dose transdermal estradiol (LTE2) replacement will be more effective in stimulating feminization, height velocity, and bone mineral density without compromising growth potential than very low dose transdermal estradiol (VLTE2), which will in turn be superior to GH alone in effects on feminization, height velocity, and bone mineral density.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Biosynthetic Growth Hormone and/or Ethinyl Estradiol on Adult Height in Patients With Turner Syndrome
NCT00001221
Safety of Somatropin and Induction of Puberty With 17-beta-oestradiol in Girls With Turner Syndrome
NCT01518062
Estrogen Treatment (Oral vs. Patches) in Turner Syndrome
NCT00140998
Somatropin Treatment to Final Height in Turner Syndrome
NCT00191113
Growth Response in Girls With Turner Syndrome
NCT01734486
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our pilot studies suggest that the form and route of estrogen are important determinants of estrogen effects on growth (2, 7). We recently found that very low doses of parenteral (IM depot) estradiol (E2) together with recombinant growth hormone (GH) to Turner syndrome patients as young as 12-12.9 years of age produced a significantly greater adult height than standard doses of oral conjugated estrogen at this age (7). Thus, very low doses of the natural estrogen (estradiol, E2) administered into the systemic circulation seem optimal for growth stimulation.
Very little data are available about the optimal E2 dose for stimulation of epiphyseal growth and how this may relate to the optimal dosage for accrual of bone mineral density and feminization.
Our recent pilot study started with a depot E2 dose of 0.2 mg; the monthly dose was then increased by 0.2 mg at successive 6-month intervals. The lowest dose (0.2 mg) stimulated height velocity the most. However, it did not stimulate breast development as reliably as the larger doses (≥ 0.4 mg monthly), which were also growth stimulatory although to a lesser extent. We propose to resolve questions about whether these disparities were due to the invariable sequential administration of successively larger doses or the inaccuracy of delivery of such low doses by injection, and also to compare the effects on bone mineral density of the equivalent very low and low doses of E2 delivered by transdermal patch. Transdermal E2 delivery systems are now available for easily and reliably delivering the comparable very low doses of E2 in a form more suitable for routine patient care. The current guidelines recommend starting an E2 starting dose for the induction of puberty (5-12.5 mcg daily) that is about one-tenth to one-eighth of the adult dose (100 mcg daily) (8). However, these guidelines note that it is not established whether various means of patch dose fractionation (e.g., administering a quarter patch overnight or daily or administering whole patches for 7-10 days per month) are equivalent.
Pharmacokinetic study of transdermal E2 in Turner syndrome teens showed absorption of E2 by first order kinetics (9). Steady state was achieved approximately 9 hrs after application of a 37.5 µg patch, and serum concentrations reached a mean of 52.9 ± 17.8 (SD) pg/ml. This demonstrates a rise in plasma estradiol of about 1 pg/ml (3.67 pmol/l) for every 1.0 µg applied to the skin, similar to package insert data in adults. This would suggest that a starting dose of 5-10 ug transdermal E2 daily approximates the 133-266 µg monthly amount of E2 delivered by the 0.2-0.4 mg monthly injections of E2 cypionate.
Our preliminary data support this extrapolation. In n = 3 Turner syndrome patients combining a transdermal E2 dose of 17.8 ± 2.1 (SD) mcg for an average of 14 days a month with GH therapy for 1.0 year showed increases in breast tissue diameter of 1.8 ± 0.3 cm (i.e., breast budding), bone mineral density of 0.067 ± 0.06 gm/cm2 in the lumbar spine, and height velocity of 5.16 ± 1.37 cm/year. The new VLTE2 (14 mcg) patch increases lumbar spine bone mineral density 2.4% at 1 year in post-menopausal women (P \<0.001), but no trials have been conducted in children (package insert).
We now propose to move beyond proof of the principle that systemic administration of very low or low dose E2 is efficacious to the practical application of E2 treatment. Our study used IM depot E2 (E2 cyclopentylpropionate, which is two-thirds E2), the very low doses of which required a compounding pharmacy to prepare a stock solution of 1.0 mg/cc. This was helpful with compliance, but not necessarily accurate and certainly not convenient for routine dispensing of prescriptions. Practically, we propose to extrapolate from this experience with parenteral to the readily available and highly acceptable transdermal preparations: the 14 mcg patch worn for 10 days a month delivers an E2 profile approximately equivalent to the 0.2 mg monthly dose of depot E2, and a 25 mcg patch worn for 10 days a month is approximately equivalent to the 0.4 mg monthly dose of depot E2 (7).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GH alone, Low dose E2 patch, Very Low-dose E2 patch
Group 1: Growth hormone alone, no E2. Group 2: Growth Hormone plus Estradiol patch dose A(14 mcg/d x 10 d) x 6 months then Estradiol patch dose B(25 mcg/d x 10 d) x 6 months.
Group 3: Growth Hormone plus Estradiol patch dose B(25 mcg/d x 10 d) x 6 months then Estradiol patch dose C(25 mcg/d x 3 w) x 6 months.
Norditropin, Menostar 14mcg patch, Vivelle dot 25mcg patch
GH will be maintained at 0.05mg/kg/d, adjusted every 3 months. Estradiol 14mcg patch will be applied for 10 days/month for the first 6 months in Group 2. Estradiol 25mcg patch will be applied for 10 days/month for the second 6 months in Group 2, and for the first 6 months in Group 3. Estradiol 25mcg patch will be applied for 3 weeks per month for the second 6 months in Group 3.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Norditropin, Menostar 14mcg patch, Vivelle dot 25mcg patch
GH will be maintained at 0.05mg/kg/d, adjusted every 3 months. Estradiol 14mcg patch will be applied for 10 days/month for the first 6 months in Group 2. Estradiol 25mcg patch will be applied for 10 days/month for the second 6 months in Group 2, and for the first 6 months in Group 3. Estradiol 25mcg patch will be applied for 3 weeks per month for the second 6 months in Group 3.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects will be 11.5-13.0 years of age and must have completed at least 6 months of GH therapy prior to the study.
* Subjects may not have had any estrogen prior to the study. All subjects must be breast stage 1 and euthyroid prior to the study
* Those on thyroid medication will continue the appropriate thyroid replacement therapy during the study.
Exclusion Criteria
138 Months
13 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novo Nordisk A/S
INDUSTRY
University of Michigan
OTHER
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
University of Oklahoma
OTHER
University of South Florida
OTHER
Thomas Jefferson University
OTHER
University of Chicago
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert L. Rosenfield, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Chicago
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
John Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15327B
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.