Suggested Immobilization Test (SIT) Test for Early Detection of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Augmentation - Proof of Concept
NCT ID: NCT00867893
Last Updated: 2012-08-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
68 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-02-28
2012-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The suggested immobilization test creates the stimulus situation of protracted rest while lying down that provokes RLS symptoms. It provides a sensitive test for the severity of the symptom.. It should therefore provide an early detection of any exacerbation of symptoms such as that occurring with RLS augmentation.
In addition diphenhydramine also creates an exacerbation of RLS symptoms. This exacerbation would amplify the current severity of the RLS and as such could provide a tool for enhancing the degree of augmentation. Thus testing with a diphenhydramine challenge dose before the SIT test could provide an even more sensitive measure of augmentation
The investigators specifically hypothesize:
1. The objective measures from the SIT test will reveal an increase in severity of RLS that occurs with RLS augmentation at the same time or before the augmentation is detected by the usual subjective clinical assessments.
2. An oral dose of 25 mg of diphenhydramine taken 45 minutes before a SIT test will amplify the augmentation effects shown on the objective measures of the SIT. This will provide an enhanced detection of augmentation before or at the same time as that detected by either the SIT test alone or the clinical evaluation.
This study may for the first time provide a standard highly repeatable objective measure of RLS augmentation that is as or more sensitive as a very careful clinical evaluation by someone well trained in detecting RLS augmentation. As such it would prove clinically useful to evaluate RLS treatment progress. It would also provide an efficient method for evaluating the augmentation potential of new medications for RLS. .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DA group
RLS patients started treatment on dopamine agonists within the past year
No interventions assigned to this group
NonDA
RLS patients started treatment on medication other than dopamine agonists within the past year
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Adult and adolescents 18 years of age or older
3. One of the following 2 criteria must be met:
* RLS treatment with either ropinirole or pramipexole or with a non-DA treatment (opioid or GABA active hypnotic), with the first dose each day taken at or before 4:30 PM. (Note this allows patients to be entered who had the usual tapered withdrawal from another medication with a concurrent gradual start of the DA agonist or opioid over a period of up to 12 months. In all such cases the initial evaluations must occur at least 6 weeks after discontinuing any prior drug treatment.) OR
* Off all RLS medication treatments for at least 6 weeks AND planning on starting DA agonist or a non-DA treatment (opioid or GABA active hypnotic) as the only RLS medication treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Inadequate birth control if female and able to become pregnant.
3. History of allergic reaction to diphenhydramine.
4. History of major psychiatric or chronic neurological disorder that would affect RLS treatment or judgment. These include but are not limited to bipolar depression, major affective disorder, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and all neurodegenerative diseases.
5. History of another major sleep disorder other than RLS and insomnia: narcolepsy, significant sleep-disordered breathing (DBR\>15/hr), and circadian rhythm disorder.
6. History of use of dopamine antagonist within the last year for any reason other than treating nausea.
7. History of use of tramadol within the last 3 months.
8. Unable to give informed consent.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Richard Allen
Research Associate, Department of Neurology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Richard P Allen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Sit-AUG
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id