Keratometric Tear Breakup Time and Fluorescein Tear Breakup Time

NCT ID: NCT00854906

Last Updated: 2014-10-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-02-28

Study Completion Date

2009-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the research is to determine if putting fluorescein onto the eye (most common test done for dry eye syndrome) is an accurate way to measure dry eye symptoms. The investigators can avoid placing any foreign substance into the eye by using a manual keratometer. Therefore, the investigators want to compare the measurements of tear breakup time using fluorescein with using a novel method, a manual keratometer and then compare these measurements to a validated dry eye symptoms questionnaire. All qualifying patients who were scheduled in the Jones Eye Institute Clinics for a complete eye exam were offered information about the study and invited to participate. Participants were recruited from February 29, 2009 to April 14, 2009.Participants who did not meet the study protocol's inclusion and exclusion criteria were not included the study or study data analysis. All subjects eyes were measured for KTBUT and FTBUT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is an observational study to measure the difference between Keratometric Tear Break Up Time (KTBUT) and Fluorescein Tear Break Up Time (FTBUT). All qualified study participants had their eyes measured for tear break up time measured with a keratometer and with fluorescein dye. In this study, we compare the use of the most common method, fluorescein dye, to measure tear break up time to a novel method, a keratometer, to measure tear break up time. Using the keratometer avoids instilling fluorescein dye into the tear film and not altering the tear film's physiologic environment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dry Eye

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Keratometric Tear Breakup Time

These are the study participants whose tear break up times were measured with a keratometer.

No interventions assigned to this group

Fluorescein Break Up Time

These are the study participants whose tear break up times were measured with with fluorescein dye.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* An adult, between ages 18-99
* An adult who is able to understand study instructions

Exclusion Criteria

* An adult with corneal pathology that prevents accurate assessment of keratometric or fluorescein tear break up time.
* An adult with an allergy to fluorescein, a very common eye dye that detects defects in the cornea.
* The inability to answer questions on your own.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Arkansas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

109338

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Acupuncture Treatment of Dry Eye
NCT00554879 COMPLETED NA
Effects of NOV03 on the Tear Film
NCT05723770 COMPLETED PHASE4
Acupuncture for Dry Eye Syndrome
NCT00969280 COMPLETED PHASE3
Laser Acupuncture for Dry Eye
NCT03204903 UNKNOWN NA