Comparison Study of Doxorubicin Versus Epirubicin-induced Cardiotoxicity in Patients With DLBCL

NCT ID: NCT00854568

Last Updated: 2014-08-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

398 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-31

Study Completion Date

2013-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare CHOP versus CEOP-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma. The hypothesis is epirubicin is associated with less cardiotoxicity without compromising the efficacy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The doxorucin-containing regimen (CHOP) and epirubicin-containing regimen (CEOP) are both frequently used in patients with aggress B-cell lymphoma in out institution. According to a Cochrane meta-analysis, epirubicin is less cardiotoxic than doxorubicin on a mg per mg basis. However, compared with 50mg/m2 of doxorubicin in CHOP, epirubicin was usually used at a higher dose (70mg/m2) to treat non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Because of the correlation between cumulative dose and risk of cardiotoxicity, it is reasonable to speculate that CEOP (70mg/m2) has less cardiotoxicity than CHOP (50mg/m2) when both regimens are administered with similar cycles.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CEOP regimen

CEOP regimen

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CEOP regimen

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2 IV day 1 epirubicin 70mg/m2 IV day 1 vincristine 1.4mg/m2 IV day1 (maximum: 2mg) prednisone 50mg PO days 1\~5 twice per day Or combined with rituximab 375mg/m2 IV day 0

CHOP regimen

CHOP regimen

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CHOP regimen

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2 IV day 1 doxorubicin 50mg/m2 IV day 1 vincristine 1.4mg/m2 IV day1 (maximum: 2mg) prednisone 50mg PO days 1\~5 twice per day Or combined with rituximab 375mg/m2 IV day 0

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CEOP regimen

cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2 IV day 1 epirubicin 70mg/m2 IV day 1 vincristine 1.4mg/m2 IV day1 (maximum: 2mg) prednisone 50mg PO days 1\~5 twice per day Or combined with rituximab 375mg/m2 IV day 0

Intervention Type DRUG

CHOP regimen

cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2 IV day 1 doxorubicin 50mg/m2 IV day 1 vincristine 1.4mg/m2 IV day1 (maximum: 2mg) prednisone 50mg PO days 1\~5 twice per day Or combined with rituximab 375mg/m2 IV day 0

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CEOP CHOP

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Previously untreated aggressive B-cell lymphoma
* Age range 18-75 years old
* ECOG performance status 0-2
* Life expectancy of more than 3 months
* Adequate organ function

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous serious cardiac disease
* History of other malignancies except cured basal cell carcinoma of skin and carcinoma in-situ of uterine cervix
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Serious uncontrolled diseases and intercurrent infection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fudan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ye Guo

Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ye Guo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fudan University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fudan University Cancer Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LMTG 09-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Reduced Chemotherapy in Low Risk DLBCL
NCT02752815 UNKNOWN PHASE4