Treatment of High Risk Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

NCT ID: NCT00853008

Last Updated: 2020-04-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-01-31

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Current therapeutic protocols for adult ALL consider MRD together with the baseline risk factors (age, WBC count, immunophenotype, cytogenetics) and speed in response to therapy for treatment decisions. On the other hand, the systematic use of allogeneic SCT for all adult patients (pts) with Ph- HR-ALL is still a matter of debate. The aim of the prospective study ALL-AR-03 from the Spanish PETHEMA Group was to evaluate the response to a differentiated therapy (chemotherapy or allogeneic SCT) according to early bone marrow blast clearance and MRD levels (assessed by cytofluorometry at the end of induction and consolidation therapy) in HR Ph- adult ALL patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

HR ALL included one or more of the following baseline parameters: age 30-60 yr, WBC count \>25x109/L and 11q23 or MLL rearrangements. Induction therapy included vincristine, prednisone and daunorubicin for 4 weeks. In pts with slow cytologic response to therapy (≥10% blasts in bone marrow assessed on d14) intensified induction with high dose ARA-C and mitoxantrone was administered. Early consolidation therapy included 3 cycles with rotating cytotoxic drugs including high-dose methotrexate, high-dose ARA-C and high-dose asparaginase. Pts. with slow cytologic response on d14 or MRD level \>0.05% after consolidation were assigned to allogeneic SCT (related or unrelated) and those with standard cytologic response on d14 and MRD level \<0.05% after consolidation received 3 additional cycles of delayed consolidation (identical to those of early consolidation) followed by maintenance therapy up to 2yr in CR.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vincristine

Vincristine (VCR): 1.5 mg/m2 (max 2 mg) IV d 1, 8, 15, 22 in induction VCR 2 mg, IV, d 1,8 in consolidation (cycle 1, 2)

Intervention Type DRUG

Daunorubicin

Daunorubicin (DNR): 60 mg/m2 IV d 1, 8, 15, 22

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisone

Prednisone (PDN): 60 mg/m2/d IV or PO, d 1-28

Intervention Type DRUG

Mitoxantrone

Mitoxantrone:12 mg/m2, IV d 15-17 in induction 12 mg/m2, IV,d 5 in cycle 2 consolidation

Intervention Type DRUG

Cytosine Arabinoside

ARA-C 2,000 mg/m2/12h IV, d18,19 (4 doses) in induction

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone

Dexamethasone 20 mg/m2,IV, d 1-5,10 mg/m2,IV, d 6 and 5 mg/m2,IV, d 7 in Consolidation (3 cycles)

Intervention Type DRUG

Methotrexate (MTX)

Methotrexate (MTX)3 g/m2,IV, d1 (24h)in consolidation, cycles 1 and 2 MTX (15 mg/m2/wk, IM)in maintenance MTX 15 mg, IT

Intervention Type DRUG

Cytarabine

Cytarabine 2g/m2/12h, IV d5 in cycle 1 consolidation Cytarabine 2g/m2/12h, IV d 1,2 in cycle 3 consolidation Cytarabine 30 mg, intrathecal

Intervention Type DRUG

ASP

ASP 25,000 IU/m2, IV, d5 in consolidation (cycle 1, 2, 3)

Intervention Type DRUG

Mercaptopurine

Mercaptopurine 100 mg/m2, PO, d 1-5 in consolidation

Intervention Type DRUG

Teniposide

Teniposide 150 mg/m2, IV d 3,4 in consolidation cycle 3

Intervention Type DRUG

Hydrocortisone

Hydrocortisone 20 mg, IT d 1, 28, 49, 77, 105, 175, 203, 231, 259,287, 311 intrathecal

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* High risk ALL adult patients (age\> 15 years)no treated previously
* High-risk ALL:
* One or more of the following:

* Age 30-60 yr.
* WBC count \>25x109/L
* 11q23 or ALL1/AF4
* Very high-risk ALL:
* HR ALL and one or the following:

* Slow cytologic response (\>10% blasts in BM on d14 of induction therapy).
* MRD\>0.05% (by flow cytometry) at the end of consolidation

Exclusion Criteria

* L3 ALL or B mature(sIg +) or t(8;14), t(2;8), t(8;22).
* ALL Ph (BCR/ABL) positive.
* Bifenotipics ALL as EGIL criteria.
* Indifferentiated ALL.
* Patients with cardiac pathology
* Patients with chronic liver disease in activity fase
* Pulmonary disease
* Renal insufficiency not due to ALL
* Neurological disorders not due to ALL
* PS (grades 3 and 4) not due to ALL.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

PETHEMA Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ribera Josep Mª, Dr

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

PETHEMA Foundation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Juan Canalejo

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital General

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status

Clínica Teknon

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínic i Provincial

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Sant Pau

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Duran y Reynals

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Vall d'Hebrón

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Puerta del Mar

Cadiz, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital General

Castellon, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara

Cáceres, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Josep Trueta

Girona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario

Guadalajara, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Xeral

Lugo, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital 12 de Octubre

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico Universitario

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Fuenlabrada

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Ramón y Cajal

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Carlos Haya

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen de la Victoria

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Morales Messeguer

Murcia, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Central de Asturias

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Son Llàtzer

Palma de Mallorca, , Spain

Site Status

Clínica Universitaria de Navarra

Pamplona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Parc Taulí

Sabadell, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico Universitario

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Xeral

Santiago, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen del Rocio

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Joan XXIII

Tarragona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Mútua de Terrassa

Terrassa, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico Universitario

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Dr Pesset

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital General

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital La Fe

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen de la Concha

Zamora, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Lozano Blesa

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ribera JM, Oriol A, Morgades M, Montesinos P, Sarra J, Gonzalez-Campos J, Brunet S, Tormo M, Fernandez-Abellan P, Guardia R, Bernal MT, Esteve J, Barba P, Moreno MJ, Bermudez A, Cladera A, Escoda L, Garcia-Boyero R, Del Potro E, Bergua J, Amigo ML, Grande C, Rabunal MJ, Hernandez-Rivas JM, Feliu E. Treatment of high-risk Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and adults according to early cytologic response and minimal residual disease after consolidation assessed by flow cytometry: final results of the PETHEMA ALL-AR-03 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 20;32(15):1595-604. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.2425. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24752047 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://aehh.org

Spanish Association of Hematology

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LAL-AR/2003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.