ALFA-0703 Study in Older Patients With Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia (AML)

NCT ID: NCT01067274

Last Updated: 2015-12-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A Randomized Multicenter Phase III Study to Evaluate the Role of All-trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA) in Combination with Induction Chemotherapy, or Azacitidine and Idarubicin as salvage therapy and Idarubicin with Cytarabine or Azacitidine as Maintenance Therapy in Older Patients with Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia (AML).

To compare the outcome of elderly patients with newly-diagnosed AML treated with standard induction chemotherapy and post-remission therapy, in only patients in CR, with either azacitidine or cytarabine combined to idarubicin +/- ATRA and salvage therapy with azacitidine combined to idarubicin +/- ATRA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Induction therapy :

First randomization (R1) at baseline : ATRA versus no ATRA.

Salvage therapy :

No conventional salvage therapy is planned. Patients who will not achieve CR, according to IWG criteria after induction will be treated with 3 courses of azacitidine and idarubicin +/- ATRA combination, if eligible for further treatment.

Followed by 3 identical courses and 6 courses of maintenance by azacitidine alone to be delivered every 28 days, in those patients reaching CR or PR after 3 courses (evaluation of response from 28 to 56 days from course 3).

Randomization R2: type of maintenance:

Response to induction will be evaluated 2 weeks after myeloid recovery, just before first consolidation course, due use of to pegfilgrastim, lenograstim or filgrastim during induction.

Responses will be classified according to the Revised Recommendations of the IWG for AML.

Patients in CR only will be subjected to a second randomization R2 as follows 6 courses of combined chemotherapy, will be delivered as outpatients, ATRA according to R1 randomization.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Aged of 65 to 79 years Older Patients with Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

R1 Arm A : ATRA

Idarubicin: 9 mg/m2/d D1 to D4 Cytarabine : 200 mg/m2/d Continuous IV from D1 to D7 Peg-filgrastim : 6 mg SC D9 or filgrastim 5ug/kg/d SC or lenograstim 263ug/d IV 30mn, both from D9 to myeloid recovery(PMN \>1G/l over 2 days at minimum

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA): 45mg/m2/day in two divided doses from D8 to D28

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vesanoid (ATRA)

Intervention Type DRUG

45 mg/m2/day in two divided doses from D8 to D28

R1 Arm B : no ATRA

Idarubicin: 9 mg/m2/d D1 to D4 Cytarabine : 200 mg/m2/d Continuous IV from D1 to D7 Peg-filgrastim : 6 mg SC D9 or filgrastim 5ug/kg/d SC or lenograstim 263ug/d IV 30mn, both from D9 to myeloid recovery(PMN \>1G/l over 2 days at minimum

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

R2 Arm 1A : AZACITIDINE and ATRA

Azacitidine: 75 mg/m2/12h SC from D1 to D5 Idarubicine: 9 mg/m2/d IV on D5 All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA): 45mg/m2/d in two divided doses from D8 to D21

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vesanoid (ATRA)

Intervention Type DRUG

45 mg/m2/day in two divided doses from D8 to D28

AZACITIDINE (VIDAZA)

Intervention Type DRUG

75 mg/m2/12h SC from D1 to D5

R2 Arm 1B : AZACITIDINE and No ATRA

Azacitidine: 75 mg/m2/12h SC from D1 to D5 Idarubicine: 9 mg/m2/d IV on D5

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AZACITIDINE (VIDAZA)

Intervention Type DRUG

75 mg/m2/12h SC from D1 to D5

R2 Arm 2A : ATRA

Idarubicine : 9 mg/m2/d IV on D1 Cytarabine : 60 mg/m2/12h SC from D1 to D5 All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA): 45mg/ m2/d in two divided doses from D8 to D21

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vesanoid (ATRA)

Intervention Type DRUG

45 mg/m2/day in two divided doses from D8 to D28

CYTARABINE

Intervention Type DRUG

Cytarabine : 60 mg/m2/12h SC from D1 to D5

R2 Arm 2B : no ATRA

Idarubicine : 9 mg/m2/d IV on D1 Cytarabine : 60 mg/m2/12h SC from D1 to D5

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CYTARABINE

Intervention Type DRUG

Cytarabine : 60 mg/m2/12h SC from D1 to D5

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vesanoid (ATRA)

45 mg/m2/day in two divided doses from D8 to D28

Intervention Type DRUG

AZACITIDINE (VIDAZA)

75 mg/m2/12h SC from D1 to D5

Intervention Type DRUG

CYTARABINE

Cytarabine : 60 mg/m2/12h SC from D1 to D5

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

VEZANOIDE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Aged of 65 to 79 years
2. With a morphologically proven diagnosis of AML according to WHO classification either de novo or AML with "myelodysplasia related changes"
3. Not previously treated for AML
4. Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. APL in the WHO classification.
2. Ph1-positive AML or prior Ph1-positive disease
3. AML evolving from a prior MPN in the WHO 2008 classification.
4. Prior treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy for another tumor
5. Prior tumor, if not stable for at least two years, except in-situ carcinoma and skin carcinoma
6. Prior advanced malignant hepatic tumor
7. ECOG Performance Status Score \> 2
8. Creatinine level more than 2x's the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) at the laboratory where the analysis was performed, except if AML-related.
9. Total serum bilirubin more than 2x's the ULN at the laboratory where the analysis was performed, except if AML-related.
10. AST (SGOT) or ALT (SGPT) more than 2.5x's the ULN at the laboratory where the analysis was performed, except if AML-related
11. LVEF less than.55 or equivalent by doppler echocardiography
12. Known intolerance to Azacitidine, mannitol, retinoids
13. Positive serum test for HIV and HTLV-1
14. NYHA Grade 3/4 cardiac disease .
15. Severe infection at inclusion time.
16. Psychiatric disease or an history of non-compliance to medical regimens or patients considered potentially unreliable.
17. Absence of health care insurance (affiliation à un régime de Sécurité Sociale)
18. Participation to any study requiring informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Acute Leukemia French Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Avicenne Hospital- Hôpital Avicenne, AP-HP Bobigny

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GARDIN CLAUDE, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Acute Leukemia French Association

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chu Amiens Sud

Amiens, , France

Site Status

CH

Argenteuil, , France

Site Status

Hopital Avicenne

Bobigny, , France

Site Status

Chu Boulogne Sur Mer

Boulogne-sur-Mer, , France

Site Status

CH

Caen, , France

Site Status

Hopital Percy

Clamart, , France

Site Status

Ch Sud Francilien

Corbeil-Essonnes, , France

Site Status

Hopital Henri Mondor

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Ch Dunkerque

Dunkirk, , France

Site Status

CH

Lens, , France

Site Status

CHU

Lille, , France

Site Status

CH

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Hopital Edouard Herriot

Lyon, , France

Site Status

CH

Meaux, , France

Site Status

Centre Antoine Lacassagne

Nice, , France

Site Status

St Antoine Hospital

Paris, , France

Site Status

Necker Hospital

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hopital Saint-Louis

Paris, , France

Site Status

Ch Rene Dubos

Pontoise, , France

Site Status

CH

Roubaix, , France

Site Status

CHU

Rouen, , France

Site Status

CNLCC

Saint-Cloud, , France

Site Status

CH

Valenciennes, , France

Site Status

CH

Versailles, , France

Site Status

IGR

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ALFA-0703 Study - P060205

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id