The BIOPRES Trial: Transrectal BIOpsies of the PRostate: End Versus Side-firing

NCT ID: NCT00851292

Last Updated: 2011-06-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

800 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to study the difference in prostate cancer between two prostate biopsy techniques, namely end-firing and side-firing. These differ in the angle at which the prostate is biopsied.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: Research towards the efficacy of transrectal prostate biopsies has predominantly focused on the amount of biopsy cores. However, variation in the angle of entrance of the biopsy gun has been less studied. It is believed that obtaining biopsy cores by end firing will improve the efficacy, because of an improved sampling of the apical region.

Objectives: To investigate the difference between side and end-firing in transrectal prostate needle biopsies in terms of qualitative and quantitative prostate cancer detection.

Methods: From September 1st 2009 - September 1st 2012, all men with an initial prostate biopsy in a representative, Dutch, general hospital with six participating urologists and two residents will be subjected to a randomized controlled, single blind, single center, diagnostics trial. Men will be randomized for a biopsy using an end-firing or a side-firing probe. The primary endpoint is the prostate cancer detection rate; secondary endpoints are the number of cores invaded with prostate cancer, nomogram for indolent cancer-score, Gleason score, complications and biopsy length.

Expected outcomes: We hypothesize that no differences between the biopsy techniques exist.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Side-firing

prostate biopsies obtained with side-firing probe

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TRUS probe

Intervention Type DEVICE

end-firing and side-firing vary in the angle in which they sample the prostate

End-firing

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TRUS probe

Intervention Type DEVICE

end-firing and side-firing vary in the angle in which they sample the prostate

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TRUS probe

end-firing and side-firing vary in the angle in which they sample the prostate

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* PSA and DRE performed in advance of the biopsy
* Informed consent
* Number of biopsy cores according to the volume dependent biopsy protocol (8 cores in prostates with a volume less than 40 mL., 10 in 40-60 mL. and 12 in \>60 mL.)

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amphia Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amphia hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stijn Roemeling, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Amphia Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amphia hospital

Breda, North Brabant, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Stijn Roemeling, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ROE-3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Targeted Fusion Biopsy of the Prostate
NCT02744534 COMPLETED PHASE2
MRI Guided Prostate Biopsy
NCT06302595 RECRUITING NA