Feasibility and Effectiveness of Community Based Isoniazid Preventive Therapy in Kenya

NCT ID: NCT00850915

Last Updated: 2013-05-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

1259 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-04-30

Study Completion Date

2012-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) is a well studied clinical intervention for primary and secondary prevention of active tuberculosis (TB) after infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It is widely used in industrialized countries in TB outbreak management, focusing on high risk groups such as close contacts in the family, in congregate settings, and in the workplace amongst others. Individuals infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) have a markedly higher risk of acquiring a TB-infection and developing consequently active TB, making HIV-infected individuals a target population for IPT. Studies of IPT in HIV infected persons in the nineties demonstrated the efficacy of IPT in the prevention of active TB in Sub -Saharan Africa and more recent studies suggest that the protective effect remains present in individuals on antiretroviral therapy.

Despite the proven efficacy of IPT this intervention has not been taken up by most HIV and TB control programmes in Africa where the burden of TB/HIV is highest. The reasons for the low uptake of IPT are many and varied but include fears of expansion of isoniazid resistance and subsequently the development of multi -drug resistant TB with widespread use of IPT. Additionally screening protocols for excluding active TB and selecting persons for IPT have not been uniformly agreed upon. There have also been concerns that programmes designed to provide IPT may shift TB control programmes from their primary responsibility of finding and treating active TB. Finally it has been unclear as to which programme, between the HIV and the TB control programme, has the primary responsibility of managing the provision of the IPT intervention.

The World Health Organization and other technical agencies engaged in global TB control have recently re-emphasized the need to scale up IPT. In this proposal we outline an operational research study to evaluate the introduction of IPT at community level and to measure its effectiveness at preventing TB. The study is based on the context of expansion of Community-Based Direct Observed Therapy Short Course (CB-DOTS), home-based care and the concept of HIV prevention with positives (PwPs), where there is a real opportunity to focus on the household as a source of HIV-associated tuberculosis.

The study is designed as a cluster randomized trial. It compares the incidence of TB in household contacts including children under 5 of identified TB/HIV co-infected patients, who received IPT through proactive community intervention and those in a control group where the community was handled in the "usual way". In the intervention group household contacts of index cases of HIV positive, smear positive PTB will be visited at home and consenting contacts will be screened for active TB using a simple questionnaire. Those found to be fit will receive isoniazid 300mg (5 mg per Kg for children) once daily for 6 months, regardless of the HIV-status. Those found not to be fit will be referred for further evaluation at the nearest TB diagnostic centre. In the control group, routine care following national guidelines will be offered. This consists of contact invitation and assessment of eligibility for IPT, especially, in children less than 5 years. Both groups will be followed up monthly through household visits. Follow up will be for a total of 24 months including the six months when IPT is provided.

A confidential HIV screening test will be provided to all consenting contacts in both intervention and control group after appropriate counseling.

The primary outcome is the incidence of TB in the intervention and control household contacts. The difference in incidence between the two groups is a measure of efficacy of the intervention. In addition the efficacy of the intervention will be estimated stratified by HIV status of household contacts if data allows. Secondary outcomes are the incidence of adverse events, the incidence of TB-related symptoms, measures on the uptake of IPT (proportion of contacts starting and discontinuing IPT, treatment adherence) and programmatic indicators, i.e. percentage of persons eligible for IPT and resources needed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tuberculosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

in this arm contacts of enrolled TB-HIV index cases were actively approached and screened for TB and offered HIV testing by CHW at their homes

Group Type OTHER

community IPT

Intervention Type OTHER

In the intervention group, the household contacts of enrolled TB/HIV co-infected patient are visited at home by community health workers. Those contacts providing informed consent and considered fit (assessed by simple questionnaire) are assumed not to have active TB and are eligible for IPT. They are offered isoniazid at 300mg (5 mg per Kg for children) once daily for 6 months, regardless of their HIV-status.

In the control group, in line with routine care, eligible index cases are requested to send their contacts to the clinic for evaluation. Contacts presenting to the clinic will be screened for TB and receive IPT, if under 5 years and when active TB is ruled out as per the current national guidelines.

All contacts (both intervention and control group) are followed up monthly to assess occurrence of symptoms suggestive of TB.

2

no interventation was done in this group, they received the regulare care and follow up following NTP guidelines

Group Type OTHER

community IPT

Intervention Type OTHER

In the intervention group, the household contacts of enrolled TB/HIV co-infected patient are visited at home by community health workers. Those contacts providing informed consent and considered fit (assessed by simple questionnaire) are assumed not to have active TB and are eligible for IPT. They are offered isoniazid at 300mg (5 mg per Kg for children) once daily for 6 months, regardless of their HIV-status.

In the control group, in line with routine care, eligible index cases are requested to send their contacts to the clinic for evaluation. Contacts presenting to the clinic will be screened for TB and receive IPT, if under 5 years and when active TB is ruled out as per the current national guidelines.

All contacts (both intervention and control group) are followed up monthly to assess occurrence of symptoms suggestive of TB.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

community IPT

In the intervention group, the household contacts of enrolled TB/HIV co-infected patient are visited at home by community health workers. Those contacts providing informed consent and considered fit (assessed by simple questionnaire) are assumed not to have active TB and are eligible for IPT. They are offered isoniazid at 300mg (5 mg per Kg for children) once daily for 6 months, regardless of their HIV-status.

In the control group, in line with routine care, eligible index cases are requested to send their contacts to the clinic for evaluation. Contacts presenting to the clinic will be screened for TB and receive IPT, if under 5 years and when active TB is ruled out as per the current national guidelines.

All contacts (both intervention and control group) are followed up monthly to assess occurrence of symptoms suggestive of TB.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Index cases

* New sputum smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients initiating treatment for TB
* HIV infected
* Resident in the catchment area of the TB diagnostic facility
* Written informed consent
* Age equal or greater than 15 years.

Contacts

* Household contacts of a HIV infected smear positive PTB
* No plans to relocate to another area for at least the next two years
* Asymptomatic (Fit) with no cough in last 2 weeks, fever, weight loss (or failure to gain weight in children), haemoptysis or chronic diarrhea at least for the last one month.
* Written informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stichting Mondiale Tuberculose (SMT)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kenya Medical Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Division of Leprosy Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, MOPHS, Kenya

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Kenya.

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation, Kenya

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kenya National AIDS & STI Control Programme

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eveline Klinkenberg

senior epidemiologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeremy M Chakaya, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre for Respiratory Diseases Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute

Eveline Klinkenberg, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, the Netherlands

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Makuyu H/C

Makuyu-Muranga, Central, Kenya

Site Status

Huruma Lions -Central district

Nairobi, Nairobi North, Kenya

Site Status

Kangemi HC

Nairobi, Nairobi North, Kenya

Site Status

Blue House, Mathare

Nairobi, Nairobi South, Kenya

Site Status

Jericho HC

Nairobi, Nairobi South, Kenya

Site Status

Kibera AMREF

Nairobi, Nairobi South, Kenya

Site Status

MMM, Mukuru, Embakasi

Nairobi, Nairobi South, Kenya

Site Status

Pumwani Majengo H/C

Nairobi, Nairobi South, Kenya

Site Status

Remand H/C

Nairobi, Nairobi South, Kenya

Site Status

Soweto Kayole, Embakasi

Nairobi, Nairobi South, Kenya

Site Status

KAPSABET District Hospital

Kapsabet-Nandi, North Rift, Kenya

Site Status

NYALENDA

Kisumu District, Nyanza North, Kenya

Site Status

Kadem leprosy, Migori

Migori District, Nyanza South, Kenya

Site Status

Muhuru Health centre, Migori

Migori District, Nyanza South, Kenya

Site Status

Awendo SDH

Rongo District, Nyanza South, Kenya

Site Status

Lanet

Nakuru, RVS, Kenya

Site Status

Nakuru West

Nakuru, RVS, Kenya

Site Status

Narok District Hosp

Narok, RVS, Kenya

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Kenya

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UR-01-2009-IPT-KENYA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Essentiality of INH in TB Therapy
NCT01589497 COMPLETED PHASE2