Carbon Monoxide Monitoring and Emergency Treatment

NCT ID: NCT00841165

Last Updated: 2010-04-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Carbon monoxide (CO) has been called a "silent killer", and those patients who survive CO poisoning are at risk of neurological damage, which may be permanent. CO is a leading cause of unintentional poisoning deaths in the United States, and the odorless gas results in an estimated average of 20,636 emergency department (ED) visits each year. Oxygen is the antidote for CO poisoning, and it acts both by attenuating toxic effects and enhancing elimination. A fractional inspired concentration of oxygen (FiO2) of 0.7 to 0.9 may be achieved by administration of 100% oxygen delivered using a reservoir with a facemask that prevents rebreathing. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy may provide added benefit for patients with CO poisoning, but this therapy is unavailable in many parts of the United States including Vermont. Use of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask may achieve an FiO2 of 1.0, but the effects of delivering an FiO2 of 1.0 compared to 0.7 in CO poisoning are unknown. CPAP, by comparison, is inexpensive, portable, and available in most EDs. In this study, the investigators are testing the hypothesis that oxygen delivered by CPAP will improve both CO washout kinetics and functional outcomes, compared to the standard therapy of oxygen delivered by non-rebreathing facemask. Specific Aim 1 will provide toxicokinetic data to support a potential benefit in the use of CPAP for CO poisoning, by comparing CO elimination kinetics in response to oxygen therapy delivered by non-rebreathing facemask versus CPAP. The 20 patients expected in our first year will provide adequate power to detect a 20% fall in half-time of CO elimination. While CPAP may increase CO washout rates, as predicted in Specific Aim 1, demonstration of real functional benefit will be tested in Specific Aim 2. This Aim seeks to determine functional (neuropsychological) outcomes in patients with CO poisoning treated with oxygen therapy delivered by non-rebreathing facemask versus CPAP. Data showing a therapeutic benefit from CPAP in CO poisoning would have clinical implications. Compared to hyperbaric oxygen therapy, CPAP therapy can begin earlier, including the pre-hospital setting, for patients with known exposure. With the frequent nature of CO poisoning and the widespread availability of CPAP, a potential benefit could lead to improved outcomes for the 20,000+ patients who present to EDs annually.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Participants in this arm are treated with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure at 5cm H2O and 100% oxygen

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Intervention Type DEVICE

Full face CPAP at 5cm H2O and 100% oxygen

2

Participants in this arm receive standard of care therapy- oxygen via a non-rebreather mask

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Non-rebreather oxygen mask

Intervention Type DEVICE

Oxygen administered through a non-rebreather mask

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Full face CPAP at 5cm H2O and 100% oxygen

Intervention Type DEVICE

Non-rebreather oxygen mask

Oxygen administered through a non-rebreather mask

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Elevated Carboxyhemoglobin Level (non-smokers \>8%, smokers \>12%)
* 18 years of age or older
* Able to provide informed consent as assessed by Attending Emergency Physician

Exclusion Criteria

* Requires daily medication for active lung disease
* Altered mental status
* Hemodynamically unstable
* Requires transfer to ICU or hyperbaric oxygen facility
* Previous enrollment in the study
* No concurrent acute psychiatric illness
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Vermont

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Department of Surgery, University of Vermont

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kalev Freeman, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Vermont

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fletcher Allen Health Care

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tyler J Lemay, BFA

Role: CONTACT

Kalev Freeman, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bruce MC, Bruce EN. Analysis of factors that influence rates of carbon monoxide uptake, distribution, and washout from blood and extravascular tissues using a multicompartment model. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Apr;100(4):1171-80. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00512.2005. Epub 2005 Dec 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16339350 (View on PubMed)

Bruce EN, Bruce MC. A multicompartment model of carboxyhemoglobin and carboxymyoglobin responses to inhalation of carbon monoxide. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Sep;95(3):1235-47. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00217.2003. Epub 2003 May 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12754170 (View on PubMed)

Weaver LK. Clinical practice. Carbon monoxide poisoning. N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 19;360(12):1217-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0808891. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19297574 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHRMS 09-056

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Helmet NIV in Acute Respiratory Failure
NCT05022173 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA