Comparison of Breathing Event Detection by a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Device to Clinical Polysomnography

NCT ID: NCT00836758

Last Updated: 2019-01-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

115 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-02-28

Study Completion Date

2009-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is to compare the performance of a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) device to a clinical polysomnography (PSG) in identifying breathing events in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the AED algorithm used in a PAP device with manually scored events on PSG. The PAP device was modified to produce a square wave voltage output identifying when apneas, hypopneas, and snoring events were detected. Recording this event signal on the PSG performed with the patient using the PAP device allowed an event-by-event comparison between manually scored PSG events and AED events. In addition, the AHI, AI, and HI derived from the manually scored PSG were compared with the respective measures reported by the PAP device used during the PSG.

Study Objectives: Compare automatic event detection (AED) of respiratory events using a positive airway pressure (PAP) device with manual scoring of polysomnography (PSG) during PAP treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Design: Prospective PSGs of patients using a PAP device.

Setting: Six academic and private sleep disorders centers.

Interventions: A signal generated by the PAP device identifying the AED of respiratory events based on airflow was recorded during PSG.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sleep Apnea

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Participants wore a PAP device and had a PSG at the same time. These participants had their PSG data compared to the PAP data.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CPAP Device

Breathing event detection (AED) by the CPAP device will be compared to breathing event detection by a simultaneous PSG (manual PSG scoring).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Analysis with AED and manual PSG scoring

Intervention Type DEVICE

The CPAP device will be set-up at a sub-therapeutic pressure and will remain at this pressure for the entire night, if tolerated. Then the events will be analyzed with Automatic Event Detection (AED) and manual PSG scoring.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Analysis with AED and manual PSG scoring

The CPAP device will be set-up at a sub-therapeutic pressure and will remain at this pressure for the entire night, if tolerated. Then the events will be analyzed with Automatic Event Detection (AED) and manual PSG scoring.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 21-75
2. Diagnosis of OSAHS with a baseline AHI ≥ 15 events/hr of sleep assessed January 01, 2007 or later
3. CPAP prescription of 8cm of H20 or higher
4. Able and willing to provide written informed consent
5. Native English speaker

Exclusion Criteria

1. Participation in another interventional research study within the last 30 days
2. Major medical or psychiatric condition that would interfere with the demands of the study and adherence to PAP. Examples include unstable cardiovascular disease (Class III / IV CHF), neuromuscular disease, cancer, and renal failure.
3. Chronic respiratory failure or insufficiency with suspected or known neuromuscular disease, moderate or severe continuous positive airway pressure (COPD) or other pulmonary disorders, or any condition with an elevation of arterial carbon dioxide levels (\> 45 mmHg) while awake, or subjects requiring continuous oxygen therapy.
4. Surgery of the upper airway, nose, sinus, or middle ear within the previous 90 days
5. Surgery at any time for the treatment of OSAHS such as uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP)
6. Presence of untreated or poorly managed,non-OSAHS related sleep disorders:

1. moderate to severe periodic limb movements(≥ 30/hr with symptoms or arousals)
2. arousals associated with periodic limb movements \> 10 per hour or
3. anyone experiencing chronic and severe insomnia.
7. Consumption of ethanol immediately prior to the research PSG
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Philips Respironics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard Berry, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Florida

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shands and UF Sleep Disorder Center

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EDILP-2008-SST-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.