Maintenance Vitamin D Therapy for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (2HPT)
NCT ID: NCT00828347
Last Updated: 2016-01-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
35 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-01-31
2009-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Therefore, the present study compared the efficacy of two maintenance therapy protocols, i.e., oral administration of alfacalcidol (an oral vitamin D preparation) at a dose of 1.0 ug/day (higher-dose group) or at a dose of 0.25 ug/day (lower-dose group), in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism who responded to initial maxacalcitol therapy, resulting in the control of iPTH to \< 150 pg/mL.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Paricalcitol Compared to Maxacalcitol in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
NCT00990704
Initial Dosing of Paricalcitol in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
NCT00307840
Effectiveness of Oral Alfacalcidol for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients.
NCT02895061
Prevention of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism With Vitamin D in Stage II/III Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT00781417
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Paricalcitol Injection With Maxacalcitol Injection in Adult Japanese Chronic Kidney Disease Subjects Receiving Hemodialysis With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
NCT01341782
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines recommend that the target range of iPTH level for vitamin D therapy should be set at 150-300 pg/mL. In Japan, the mortality risk was significantly lower in the group of patients with iPTH levels \< 120 pg/mL than in the standard group set at 180 pg/mL \< iPTH \< 360 pg/mL, and lowest in the group of patients with 60 pg/mL \< iPTH \< 120 pg/mL . Based on these findings, Japanese guideline recommend that the target range of iPTH should be set at 60-180 pg/mL .
The efficacies of various oral and intravenous vitamin D preparations for treating SHPT in hemodialysis patients have been reported. and oral or intravenous vitamin D pulse therapy has been clinically applied, especially for patients with severe SHPT.
Up to now, the effectiveness of an oral daily alfacalcidol on SHPT has been confirmed at the dose of 0.25-0.5 μg /day (average 0.364μg /day), 0.5 μg /day, and 1.0 μg /day. The effective dose of OCT has also been verified, and furthermore, it has also been reported that intravenous vitamin D was more effective than oral vitamin D for suppressing PTH secretion. Accordingly, at present intravenous vitamin D therapy is the standard treatment for SHPT, and there are established protocols with regard to dosage and administration. However, no protocols have been established for maintenance therapy using intravenous or oral vitamin D preparations after the control of iPTH target range has been achieved.
Therefore, the present study compared the efficacy of two maintenance therapy protocols for patients with SHPT who responded to initial OCT therapy, resulting in the control of iPTH to \<150pg/mL. One was oral administration of alfacalcidol (an oral vitamin D preparation) at a dose of 1.0 μg/day (higher-dose group) and the other was at a dose of 0.25 μg/day (lower-dose group), both of which are clinically effective doses for HD patients with SHPT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1.0 μg/day Alfacalcidol
Alfacalcidol 1.0 μg capsule by mouth, every day for 6 months
1.0 μg/day Alfacalcidol
We compared the efficacy of two protocols for maintenance therapy, which were oral administration of alfacalcidol at a dose of 1.0 μg/day in patients whose iPTH level was controlled to \< 150 pg/mL by initial maxacalcitol therapy.
0.25 μg/day Alfacalcidol
Alfacalcidol 0.25 μg capsule by mouth, every day for 6 months
0.25 μg/day Alfacalcidol
We compared the efficacy of two protocols for maintenance therapy, which were oral administration of alfacalcidol at a dose of 0.25 μg/day in patients whose iPTH level was controlled to \< 150 pg/mL by initial maxacalcitol therapy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
1.0 μg/day Alfacalcidol
We compared the efficacy of two protocols for maintenance therapy, which were oral administration of alfacalcidol at a dose of 1.0 μg/day in patients whose iPTH level was controlled to \< 150 pg/mL by initial maxacalcitol therapy.
0.25 μg/day Alfacalcidol
We compared the efficacy of two protocols for maintenance therapy, which were oral administration of alfacalcidol at a dose of 0.25 μg/day in patients whose iPTH level was controlled to \< 150 pg/mL by initial maxacalcitol therapy.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Serum Ca \< 11.0 mg/dL, and serum P \< 7.0 mg/dL.
* At least one year of regular hemodialysis therapy
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who had received parathyroidectomy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kumamoto University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Masataka Adachi
Nephrology KU
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Masataka Adachi, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department nephrology Kumamoto University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kumamoto University Hospital
Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KumaNeph2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.