Maintenance Vitamin D Therapy for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (2HPT)

NCT ID: NCT00828347

Last Updated: 2016-01-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-31

Study Completion Date

2009-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are still no established protocols for maintenance therapy with intravenous or oral vitamin D preparations after the iPTH target has been achieved.

Therefore, the present study compared the efficacy of two maintenance therapy protocols, i.e., oral administration of alfacalcidol (an oral vitamin D preparation) at a dose of 1.0 ug/day (higher-dose group) or at a dose of 0.25 ug/day (lower-dose group), in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism who responded to initial maxacalcitol therapy, resulting in the control of iPTH to \< 150 pg/mL.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) causes various bone mineral disorders, which have recently been named CKD mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). CKD-MBD presents a spectrum of skeletal abnormalities ranging from high bone turnover state such as osteitis fibrosa, which is seen with SHPT, to states of low bone turnover, which includes osteomalacia and adynamic bone disease. This disease not only increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality, but also increases the risk of fracture. Therefore, it is important to correct the serum inorganic phosphorus (Pi), calcium (Ca) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in dialysis patients, to achieve both appropriate bone turnover and to improve mortality.

The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines recommend that the target range of iPTH level for vitamin D therapy should be set at 150-300 pg/mL. In Japan, the mortality risk was significantly lower in the group of patients with iPTH levels \< 120 pg/mL than in the standard group set at 180 pg/mL \< iPTH \< 360 pg/mL, and lowest in the group of patients with 60 pg/mL \< iPTH \< 120 pg/mL . Based on these findings, Japanese guideline recommend that the target range of iPTH should be set at 60-180 pg/mL .

The efficacies of various oral and intravenous vitamin D preparations for treating SHPT in hemodialysis patients have been reported. and oral or intravenous vitamin D pulse therapy has been clinically applied, especially for patients with severe SHPT.

Up to now, the effectiveness of an oral daily alfacalcidol on SHPT has been confirmed at the dose of 0.25-0.5 μg /day (average 0.364μg /day), 0.5 μg /day, and 1.0 μg /day. The effective dose of OCT has also been verified, and furthermore, it has also been reported that intravenous vitamin D was more effective than oral vitamin D for suppressing PTH secretion. Accordingly, at present intravenous vitamin D therapy is the standard treatment for SHPT, and there are established protocols with regard to dosage and administration. However, no protocols have been established for maintenance therapy using intravenous or oral vitamin D preparations after the control of iPTH target range has been achieved.

Therefore, the present study compared the efficacy of two maintenance therapy protocols for patients with SHPT who responded to initial OCT therapy, resulting in the control of iPTH to \<150pg/mL. One was oral administration of alfacalcidol (an oral vitamin D preparation) at a dose of 1.0 μg/day (higher-dose group) and the other was at a dose of 0.25 μg/day (lower-dose group), both of which are clinically effective doses for HD patients with SHPT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1.0 μg/day Alfacalcidol

Alfacalcidol 1.0 μg capsule by mouth, every day for 6 months

Group Type OTHER

1.0 μg/day Alfacalcidol

Intervention Type DRUG

We compared the efficacy of two protocols for maintenance therapy, which were oral administration of alfacalcidol at a dose of 1.0 μg/day in patients whose iPTH level was controlled to \< 150 pg/mL by initial maxacalcitol therapy.

0.25 μg/day Alfacalcidol

Alfacalcidol 0.25 μg capsule by mouth, every day for 6 months

Group Type OTHER

0.25 μg/day Alfacalcidol

Intervention Type DRUG

We compared the efficacy of two protocols for maintenance therapy, which were oral administration of alfacalcidol at a dose of 0.25 μg/day in patients whose iPTH level was controlled to \< 150 pg/mL by initial maxacalcitol therapy.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

1.0 μg/day Alfacalcidol

We compared the efficacy of two protocols for maintenance therapy, which were oral administration of alfacalcidol at a dose of 1.0 μg/day in patients whose iPTH level was controlled to \< 150 pg/mL by initial maxacalcitol therapy.

Intervention Type DRUG

0.25 μg/day Alfacalcidol

We compared the efficacy of two protocols for maintenance therapy, which were oral administration of alfacalcidol at a dose of 0.25 μg/day in patients whose iPTH level was controlled to \< 150 pg/mL by initial maxacalcitol therapy.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

One alpha One alpha

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of secondary hyperparathyroidism (iPTH \>200 pg/mL to \<500 pg/mL)
* Serum Ca \< 11.0 mg/dL, and serum P \< 7.0 mg/dL.
* At least one year of regular hemodialysis therapy

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to any ingredient of maxacalcitol
* Patients who had received parathyroidectomy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kumamoto University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Masataka Adachi

Nephrology KU

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Masataka Adachi, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department nephrology Kumamoto University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kumamoto University Hospital

Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Japan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KumaNeph2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

DePTH: De-emphasize PTH
NCT06288451 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2
Paricalcitol Injection Phase II Trial
NCT00646932 COMPLETED PHASE2