A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the ExcelTM Sirolimus Eluting Stent With a Biodegradable Polymer Versus Sirolimus Eluting Stent With Non-Biodegradable Polymer in the Treatment of Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions
NCT ID: NCT00825773
Last Updated: 2009-01-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
1944 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-10-31
2014-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
EXCEL-II Stent Vesus EXCEL Stent to Treat the Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions.
NCT02057978
EXCEL-II DES to Treat the Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions. (CREDIT-III)
NCT02027870
A Pilot First In Man Study of EXCEL-Ⅱto Treat the Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions
NCT01909869
Safety and Efficacy of the CRE8 Stent for the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions
NCT02360423
Elixir Medical Clinical Evaluation of the Novolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System: A Randomized Study "EXCELLA II STUDY"
NCT00792753
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel two-arm multi-center study, comparing the ExcelTM DES to CypherTM DES in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Excel DES (biodegradable polymer) compared to the Cypher DES (non-biodegradable polymer) in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.
Approximately 1944 patients will be enrolled in up to 25 centers in China. Primary Endpoint:Ischemia-driven Target Vessel Failure which is a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (Q and non-Q wave) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months.
Secondary Endpoint:
1. Ischemia-driven Target Lesion Failure (TLF) at 12 months defined as a composite of cardiac death that can not be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel, target vessel MI (Q and Non-Q wave) and ischemia-driven TLR.
2. Rates of stent thrombosis, defined (per ARC definition) as definite or probable and categorized as early, late or very late.
3. Rates for each component of the TLF composite endpoint (cardiac death, target vessel MI, ischemia- driven TLR) at 12 months post-procedure.
4. Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) defined as cardiac Death, target vessel MI (Q and Non-Q wave), or target Lesion revascularization (TLR) at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and 2 to 5 years annually.
5. Device Success defined as achievement of a final residual in-stent diameter stenosis of \< 30% (visual estimate) and a TIMI flow of 3 using the Excel/Cypher DES.
6. Procedure Success defined as achievement of a final in- stent diameter stenosis of \< 30% (visual estimate) and a TIMI flow of 3 using any percutaneous method, without the occurrence of in-hospital MACE. (ALL TLR IN THIS STUDY WILL BE CLINICALLY INDICATED)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Excel
Patients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to one of two treatment arms (the Excel DES or the Cypher DES). Randomization will be stratified by study site and number of vessels intended to be treated by the site investigator. Randomization will be accomplished through use of envelope randomization at the sites using the pre-assigned envelope randomization system. The study patient is considered enrolled upon randomization.
Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty
Patients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to one of two treatment arms (the Excel DES or the Cypher DES). Randomization will be stratified by study site and number of vessels intended to be treated by the site investigator. Randomization will be accomplished through use of envelope randomization at the sites using the pre-assigned envelope randomization system. The study patient is considered enrolled upon randomization.
Cypher
Patients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to one of two treatment arms (the Excel DES or the Cypher DES). Randomization will be stratified by study site and number of vessels intended to be treated by the site investigator. Randomization will be accomplished through use of envelope randomization at the sites using the pre-assigned envelope randomization system. The study patient is considered enrolled upon randomization.
Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty
Patients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to one of two treatment arms (the Excel DES or the Cypher DES). Randomization will be stratified by study site and number of vessels intended to be treated by the site investigator. Randomization will be accomplished through use of envelope randomization at the sites using the pre-assigned envelope randomization system. The study patient is considered enrolled upon randomization.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty
Patients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to one of two treatment arms (the Excel DES or the Cypher DES). Randomization will be stratified by study site and number of vessels intended to be treated by the site investigator. Randomization will be accomplished through use of envelope randomization at the sites using the pre-assigned envelope randomization system. The study patient is considered enrolled upon randomization.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of stable angina, unstable angina or silent ischemia (evidence of myocardial ischemia).
3. Positive functional study or reversible change in the electrocardiogram (ECG) consistent with ischemia.
4. Patient must be an acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
5. Patient must agree to undergo all required follow-up exam- inations.
1. Presence of one or more de novo coronary artery stenosis \> 50% in native coronary arteries that corresponds with the evidence of ischemia. NOTE: In the presence of multiple de novo coronary lesions a maximum of four (4) planned Excel or Cypher stents may be used.
2. The target lesion(s) must be \< 24mm in length and the reference diameter is \> 2.5 mm and \< 3.75 mm (visual estimate).
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient is allergic or has a contraindication to aspirin, clopidogrel and ticlopidine, heparin and bivalirudin, stainless steel, PLA, contrast media (that can not be adequately pre- medicated), and sirolimus (or its analogues).
3. Patient has evidence of an Acute Myocardial Infarction evidenced by elevation of CK/CK-MB or Troponin per clinical site standards, within 72 hours of the index procedure.
4. Patient is unable to provide informed consent.
5. Patient is participating in another device or drug study that has not reached the primary endpoint of the study.
6. Patient is considered for a DES other than the Excel or the Cypher stents.
7. Patient has a co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the patient's ability to participate in the study, comply with follow- up requirements and impact the scientific integrity of the study.
1. Patient has undergone previous stenting anywhere within the target vessel(s) within the previous 12 months, or will require stenting within the target vessel(s) within 12 months after the study procedure, or has received coronary brachytherapy at anytime.
2. Heavily calcified target lesion(s) which cannot be successfully pre-dilated.
3. Target lesion(s) involves a side branch \>2.5 mm in diameter, or \< 2.5 mm in diameter requiring treatment.
4. Patient has an unprotected Left Main Coronary Lesion with a diameter of \>= 50%.
5. Anticipated use of rotoblator or cutting balloon on target lesion(s).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
JW Medical Systems Ltd
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
JW Medical Systems Ltd
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
JW Medical Systems
Beijing, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Salam AM, Al Suwaidi J, Holmes DR Jr. Drug-eluting coronary stents. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2006 Jan;31(1):8-119. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2005.09.002.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ZSH-20090119
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
H-09-01-19
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.