A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the ExcelTM Sirolimus Eluting Stent With a Biodegradable Polymer Versus Sirolimus Eluting Stent With Non-Biodegradable Polymer in the Treatment of Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions

NCT ID: NCT00825773

Last Updated: 2009-01-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

1944 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

E.V.O.L.U.T.I.O.N.: A Randomized Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the Excel Sirolimus Eluting Stent with a Biodegradable Polymer Versus Sirolimus Eluting Stent with a Non-Biodegradable Polymer in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Coronary Artery Lesions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

E.V.O.L.U.T.I.O.N.: A Randomized Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the Excel Sirolimus Eluting Stent with a Biodegradable Polymer Versus Sirolimus Eluting Stent with a Non-Biodegradable Polymer in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Coronary Artery Lesions.

A prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel two-arm multi-center study, comparing the ExcelTM DES to CypherTM DES in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Excel DES (biodegradable polymer) compared to the Cypher DES (non-biodegradable polymer) in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.

Approximately 1944 patients will be enrolled in up to 25 centers in China. Primary Endpoint:Ischemia-driven Target Vessel Failure which is a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (Q and non-Q wave) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months.

Secondary Endpoint:

1. Ischemia-driven Target Lesion Failure (TLF) at 12 months defined as a composite of cardiac death that can not be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel, target vessel MI (Q and Non-Q wave) and ischemia-driven TLR.
2. Rates of stent thrombosis, defined (per ARC definition) as definite or probable and categorized as early, late or very late.
3. Rates for each component of the TLF composite endpoint (cardiac death, target vessel MI, ischemia- driven TLR) at 12 months post-procedure.
4. Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) defined as cardiac Death, target vessel MI (Q and Non-Q wave), or target Lesion revascularization (TLR) at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and 2 to 5 years annually.
5. Device Success defined as achievement of a final residual in-stent diameter stenosis of \< 30% (visual estimate) and a TIMI flow of 3 using the Excel/Cypher DES.
6. Procedure Success defined as achievement of a final in- stent diameter stenosis of \< 30% (visual estimate) and a TIMI flow of 3 using any percutaneous method, without the occurrence of in-hospital MACE. (ALL TLR IN THIS STUDY WILL BE CLINICALLY INDICATED)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ischemia Cardiac Death Myocardial Infarction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Excel

Patients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to one of two treatment arms (the Excel DES or the Cypher DES). Randomization will be stratified by study site and number of vessels intended to be treated by the site investigator. Randomization will be accomplished through use of envelope randomization at the sites using the pre-assigned envelope randomization system. The study patient is considered enrolled upon randomization.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to one of two treatment arms (the Excel DES or the Cypher DES). Randomization will be stratified by study site and number of vessels intended to be treated by the site investigator. Randomization will be accomplished through use of envelope randomization at the sites using the pre-assigned envelope randomization system. The study patient is considered enrolled upon randomization.

Cypher

Patients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to one of two treatment arms (the Excel DES or the Cypher DES). Randomization will be stratified by study site and number of vessels intended to be treated by the site investigator. Randomization will be accomplished through use of envelope randomization at the sites using the pre-assigned envelope randomization system. The study patient is considered enrolled upon randomization.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to one of two treatment arms (the Excel DES or the Cypher DES). Randomization will be stratified by study site and number of vessels intended to be treated by the site investigator. Randomization will be accomplished through use of envelope randomization at the sites using the pre-assigned envelope randomization system. The study patient is considered enrolled upon randomization.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty

Patients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to one of two treatment arms (the Excel DES or the Cypher DES). Randomization will be stratified by study site and number of vessels intended to be treated by the site investigator. Randomization will be accomplished through use of envelope randomization at the sites using the pre-assigned envelope randomization system. The study patient is considered enrolled upon randomization.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EVOLUTION EXCEL vs CYPHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient \> 18 years of age.
2. Diagnosis of stable angina, unstable angina or silent ischemia (evidence of myocardial ischemia).
3. Positive functional study or reversible change in the electrocardiogram (ECG) consistent with ischemia.
4. Patient must be an acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
5. Patient must agree to undergo all required follow-up exam- inations.


1. Presence of one or more de novo coronary artery stenosis \> 50% in native coronary arteries that corresponds with the evidence of ischemia. NOTE: In the presence of multiple de novo coronary lesions a maximum of four (4) planned Excel or Cypher stents may be used.
2. The target lesion(s) must be \< 24mm in length and the reference diameter is \> 2.5 mm and \< 3.75 mm (visual estimate).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient is pregnant or breast feeding.
2. Patient is allergic or has a contraindication to aspirin, clopidogrel and ticlopidine, heparin and bivalirudin, stainless steel, PLA, contrast media (that can not be adequately pre- medicated), and sirolimus (or its analogues).
3. Patient has evidence of an Acute Myocardial Infarction evidenced by elevation of CK/CK-MB or Troponin per clinical site standards, within 72 hours of the index procedure.
4. Patient is unable to provide informed consent.
5. Patient is participating in another device or drug study that has not reached the primary endpoint of the study.
6. Patient is considered for a DES other than the Excel or the Cypher stents.
7. Patient has a co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the patient's ability to participate in the study, comply with follow- up requirements and impact the scientific integrity of the study.


1. Patient has undergone previous stenting anywhere within the target vessel(s) within the previous 12 months, or will require stenting within the target vessel(s) within 12 months after the study procedure, or has received coronary brachytherapy at anytime.
2. Heavily calcified target lesion(s) which cannot be successfully pre-dilated.
3. Target lesion(s) involves a side branch \>2.5 mm in diameter, or \< 2.5 mm in diameter requiring treatment.
4. Patient has an unprotected Left Main Coronary Lesion with a diameter of \>= 50%.
5. Anticipated use of rotoblator or cutting balloon on target lesion(s).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

JW Medical Systems Ltd

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

JW Medical Systems Ltd

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

JW Medical Systems

Beijing, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Lei Ge, Prof

Role: CONTACT

+8613816112695

Yongzhi Yan, Post-gradulate

Role: CONTACT

+8613910074132

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yong zhi Yan, Post-graduate

Role: primary

+8613910074132

Lei Ge, Prof

Role: backup

+8613816112695

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Salam AM, Al Suwaidi J, Holmes DR Jr. Drug-eluting coronary stents. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2006 Jan;31(1):8-119. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2005.09.002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16389102 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ZSH-20090119

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

H-09-01-19

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.