Surgical Management of Blood in the Pericardial Sac After Penetrating Trauma

NCT ID: NCT00823160

Last Updated: 2011-02-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

111 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-10-31

Study Completion Date

2009-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Penetrating wounds to the heart may present to the emergency unit with the presence of blood in the pericardial sac as determined on ultrasound. If these patients are stable, the study hypothesis is that they can be managed with a very simple surgical procedure called a subxyphoid pericardial window (SXW), in which the blood is drained from around the heart via a small skin incision below the rib cage. In all other centres in the world these cases are managed by open chest surgery called a sternotomy. The investigator's experience in dealing with these injuries is that this is unnecessary and requires a large amount of resources for no benefit to the patient.

In this study, patients are randomized to receive either open chest surgery (sternotomy) or the much smaller operation of the SXW. The patients are then followed up with respect to their hospital stay and any complications that they develop. Normally, a patient undergoing open chest surgery will stay in intensive care unit for a minimum of 2 days and have a total hospital stay of at least 7 days and be at risk of a number of complications such as pneumonia. Patients undergoing a SXW usually remain in hospital for a period of 3 days and do not require intensive care management.

The investigator's hypothesis is that in all these patients the heart injury has sealed and the patient is no longer in any danger. It is not necessary to perform open chest surgery on these patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction:

This will be the first prospective, randomized clinical study ever performed on penetrating cardiac injuries in the world literature. A group of patients with penetrating chest injuries will present haemodynamically stable, with blood in the pericardial sac diagnosed on ultrasound. The accepted international management of what is termed; "the stable haemopericardium" has been a median sternotomy. In our experience in Cape Town, when a median sternotomy is performed in these cases, any cardiac injury if present has already sealed or there is no cardiac injury. We feel that these patients should be managed with a much smaller and simpler operation that does not require admission to the intensive care unit post-operatively and this is merely drainage of the blood from around the pericardial sac via a subxyphoid window (SXW).

Method A SXW is performed under general anaesthetic and involves a 5 cm incision below the sternum. The pericardial sac can be opened and the blood drained. This small operation also allows the heart to be examined for any active bleeding. If there is active bleeding then obviously, a median sternotomy is required to fix the hole in the heart. If there is no active bleeding then the patient is randomized to either median sternotomy (the international norm) or the pericardial sac is merely drained with a soft drain and no further surgery is performed. The randomization is computer generated. The patients are documented with respect to intensive care stay and total hospital stay. Any complications are noted and the patients are then followed up in order to ensure that the patients who underwent the SXW alone are alive and well. This is essential to ensure the safety of this much smaller procedure for this condition. Informed consent is signed for each patient and all patients must be older than 18 years of age.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1: Sternotomy

Patients who are randomized to a sternotomy after the finding of blood in the pericardial sac.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sternotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sternotomy performed after finding blood in the pericardial sac

2: Subxyphoid window

Patients who receive a subxyphoid window after the finding of blood in the pericardial sac.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Subxyphoid window

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Subxyphoid window performed after the finding of blood in the pericardial sac

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sternotomy

Sternotomy performed after finding blood in the pericardial sac

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Subxyphoid window

Subxyphoid window performed after the finding of blood in the pericardial sac

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Haemodynamically stable
* Penetrating chest trauma
* Informed consent signed
* Over the age of 18 years
* Fully conscious

Exclusion Criteria

* Known coagulopathy
* Traumatic septal defect
* Haemodynamically unstable
* No informed consent
* Decreased level of consciousness
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical Research Council, South Africa

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Cape Town

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Cape Town

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrew J Nicol, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Cape Town

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Cape Town

Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Africa

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Navsaria PH, Nicol AJ. Haemopericardium in stable patients after penetrating injury: is subxiphoid pericardial window and drainage enough? A prospective study. Injury. 2005 Jun;36(6):745-50. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.08.005. Epub 2005 Mar 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15910827 (View on PubMed)

Nicol AJ, Navsaria PH, Hommes M, Ball CG, Edu S, Kahn D. Sternotomy or drainage for a hemopericardium after penetrating trauma: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2014 Mar;259(3):438-42. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31829069a1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23604058 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

266/2002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Incisions for Cardiac Surgery
NCT00229892 TERMINATED