Effect of Intravesical Lidocaine on Urodynamic and Symptomatic Parameters of Interstitial Cystitis

NCT ID: NCT00823030

Last Updated: 2015-10-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the amount of improvement in bladder function and pain relief with the administration of 2% alkalinized lidocaine in patients with interstitial cystitis. Specifically, we want to see if the administration of 2% alkalinized lidocaine treatments in the bladder improves urodynamic test result values. We hope to enroll approximately 40 patients in this study.

Previous research has shown that the administration of 2% alkalinized lidocaine in the bladder may improve the bladder's capacity to hold urine and urine flow rates while simultaneously providing pain relief. As part of standard of care at the Smith Institute of Urology Pelvic Pain Center, we routinely offer our IC patients 2% alkalinized lidocaine with follow up urodynamic evaluation. Our research looks to expand upon the prior studies and confirm the findings of improved bladder function and enhanced pain control of 2% alkalinized lidocaine versus placebo by performing a second urodynamic evaluation, which is not routinely performed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Interstitial cystitis (IC) is a chronic bladder condition that includes symptoms of bladder or pelvic pain as well as irritative voiding symptoms (urgency, frequency, nocturia, dysuria). The syndrome is usually diagnosed clinically after ruling out any possible infectious or neoplastic causes. Due to the lack of standardized diagnostic criteria, the reported prevalence of IC in the United States varies widely from 35 to 24,000 per 100,000 persons1,2. Regardless, there is no doubt that IC is a source of much distress and profoundly affects quality of life. IC patients have been reported to have lower quality of life than dialysis patients. They are 6 times more likely than the general population to cut down on work time owing to health problems and have higher reported incidences of depression, chronic pain, anxiety and overall mental health2,

The exact pathophysiology or etiology of IC is not completely understood but there have been much advancement in knowledge. The etiology is most likely multifactorial and studies have shown a role for epithelial dysfunction, inflammatory events as well as neurological dysfunction \[Figure 1\]. An initiating event such as infection, trauma, or autoimmune disorder leads to dysfunctional urothelium4. Activation and upregulation of sensory nerves occurs, leading to mast cell activation and release of histamine and other mediators5,6. This, in turn, leads to a cycle of symptoms for the IC patient.

Due to the multifactorial nature of its pathogenesis, IC treatment is complicated and involves multimodal treatments that target different factors. Tricyclic antidepressants control the regulation and activation of the nerves7. Antihistamines target mast cell activation8 while heparinoids such as pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS) or heparin targets the dysfunction epithelium. Heparin is one of the most commonly used intravesical agent for the treatment of IC. It has been found to be effective is almost 50% of patients9. While heparinoid therapy enhances the barrier effect of the disrupted urothelium, it does not directly target the sensory nerves of the bladder. Hence, it may take more than 2 years of treatment for severely affected patients to feel any symptomatic relief10. Furthermore, once symptomatic relief is achieved, it is not sustained for very long11. Urologists aimed to develop therapy that would directly affect the sensory nerves of the bladder and provide immediate symptomatic relief.

The use of intravesical lidocaine in severe IC was first reported in Sweden in 1989. Asklin et al., reported on one patient who received repeated intravesical instillations of lidocaine and achieved much relief13. Success with the treatment was subsequently reported for another patient in 199214. Surprisingly, there have been very few studies on the clinical efficacy of intravesical lidocaine in IC patients since then. To date, all studies involving intravesical lidocaine lack randomization or a control group. It is difficult to determine the influence of any existing placebo effect of intravesical instillations.

One such study was conducted in 2005 by Parsons et al., which tested the efficacy of heparin combined with intravesical lidocaine in 47 newly diagnosed IC patients. 75% of patients reported significant improvement in symptoms after just one instillation with symptomatic relief lasting at least 4 hours. Significant improvement in symptoms was reported in 94% of patients who received a second instillation using a higher concentration of lidocaine. Of 20 patients who received a course of 6 instillations over 2 weeks, 80% reported sustained relief15.

Welk and Telchman looked specifically at dyspareunia response to intravesical lidocaine in 23 IC patients. 57% reported resolution of dyspareunia. They also found a significant difference in response rate between patients with bladder tenderness and patients with multiple tender locations on vaginal exam (85% versus 29% respectively)16.

Urodynamic studies performed in IC patients generally demonstrate normal cystometry, although IC patients have characteristic reductions in bladder capacity secondary to pain and hypersensitivity to bladder dilation3. In a recent retrospective study, Srinivasan et al observed that a statistically significant difference was appreciable when comparing pre and post lidocaine UDS evaluation in bladder capacity, maximum flow rate, and first strong sensation to void. 12 The impact of alkalinized lidocaine on UDS parameters, however, remains elusive and deserving of a well designed randomized control trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Interstitial Cystitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Placebo instillation: 20 ml of normal saline instilled intravesically

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Urodynamic study

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A small catheter will be inserted into the bladder and water will slowly be instilled through the catheter and into your bladder. A series of measurements will then be taken to assess your bladder's capacity to hold liquid, the average and maximum urine flow rates, as well as bladder filling and leak point pressure readings.

Normal Saline

Intervention Type OTHER

20 cc of normal saline will be injected into the bladder after the first UDS

experimental arm

The experimental instillation will include 8 ml of 2% lidocaine, 3 ml of sodium bicarbonate, and 9 ml of normal saline.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Urodynamic study

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A small catheter will be inserted into the bladder and water will slowly be instilled through the catheter and into your bladder. A series of measurements will then be taken to assess your bladder's capacity to hold liquid, the average and maximum urine flow rates, as well as bladder filling and leak point pressure readings.

Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

20 cc of alkalinized lidocaine will be injected after the first UDS

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Urodynamic study

A small catheter will be inserted into the bladder and water will slowly be instilled through the catheter and into your bladder. A series of measurements will then be taken to assess your bladder's capacity to hold liquid, the average and maximum urine flow rates, as well as bladder filling and leak point pressure readings.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lidocaine

20 cc of alkalinized lidocaine will be injected after the first UDS

Intervention Type DRUG

Normal Saline

20 cc of normal saline will be injected into the bladder after the first UDS

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

UDS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female patients aged ≥ 18
* Clinical diagnosis of Interstitial cystitis based on the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDKK) criteria. According the NDIKK criteria, IC patients must have either glomerulations on cystoscopic examination or classic Hunner Ulcers and must also have either pain associated with the bladder or urinary urgency. Symptoms of abnormal urinary frequency and bladder pain/discomfort must have been present for at least 3 months prior to study entry
* Able to understand and complete a VAS/GRA/modified IPSS assessment
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Currently asymptomatic
* Severely debilitating or urgent concurrent medical condition
* History of pelvic radiation therapy, tuberculous cystitis, neurologic disease affecting bladder function, bladder cancer, or carcinoma in situ, or urethral cancer
* Presence of bladder, urethral, or ureteral calculi
* Clinical evidence of urethritis
* Unlikely to be compliant due to unmanaged medical or psychological problem, including neurological, psychological or speech/language problems that will interfere with ability to complete the study
* Allergy to lidocaine or any of the other anesthetics in the amide family.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northwell Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Robert Moldwin

principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert M Moldwin, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwell Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Smith Institute for Urology

Lake Success, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Parsons CL, Tatsis V. Prevalence of interstitial cystitis in young women. Urology. 2004 Nov;64(5):866-70. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.044.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15533465 (View on PubMed)

Parsons CL, Housley T, Schmidt JD, Lebow D. Treatment of interstitial cystitis with intravesical heparin. Br J Urol. 1994 May;73(5):504-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07634.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8012771 (View on PubMed)

Welk BK, Teichman JM. Dyspareunia response in patients with interstitial cystitis treated with intravesical lidocaine, bicarbonate, and heparin. Urology. 2008 Jan;71(1):67-70. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.067.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18242367 (View on PubMed)

Asklin B, Cassuto J. Intravesical lidocaine in severe interstitial cystitis. Case report. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1989;23(4):311-2. doi: 10.3109/00365598909180345.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2595329 (View on PubMed)

Parsons CL. Successful downregulation of bladder sensory nerves with combination of heparin and alkalinized lidocaine in patients with interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2005 Jan;65(1):45-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.08.056.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15667861 (View on PubMed)

Srinivasan A, Shapiro E and Moldwin RM: Effects of Intravesical Lidocaine on Urodynamic Parameters in Patients with Interstitial Cystitis/Painful Bladder Syndrome (IC/PBS).

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

08-221

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bladder Botox UTI Antibiotic Prophylaxis
NCT06387329 RECRUITING PHASE4
PK and Safety of SI-722 in IC/BPS
NCT04208087 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Hypnosis for Bladder Pain Syndrome
NCT04010513 COMPLETED NA