Activity Study of Sunitinib In Metastatic Pretreated Urothelial Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00818350
Last Updated: 2009-01-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE1/PHASE2
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-01-31
2011-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Almost all responding patients relapse within the first year, with a median survival of 12 months. Prognosis is very poor in patients who display progressive disease after receiving combination cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
No standard has yet been established for second-line treatment and well designed trials of second-line chemotherapy for metastatic transitional carcinoma of the urothelium should be given high priority.
Several drugs have been used in second line for metastatic disease with poor results.
The investigators have planned a Phase II study, open-label, single arm design to evaluate the activity and safety of sunitinib in metastatic urothelial carcinoma, pretreated with standard regimen (cisplatin-gemcitabine).
No previous studies have been published with sunitinib in metastatic bladder cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sunitinib Malate in Treating Patients With Recurrent Transitional Cell Bladder Cancer
NCT01118351
Sunitinib Scheduling in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC)
NCT02060370
Sunitinib Malate in Treating Patients With Locally Recurrent, Locally Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Urinary Tract Cancer
NCT01118039
Sunitinib as Second-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Transitional Cell Cancer
NCT00792025
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Rechallenge in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
NCT02071641
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* PRIMARY To determine the antitumor efficacy ( response rate) of sunitinib
* SECONDARY To determine: safety, duration of response, Quality of life (QoL), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
PLAN OF TREATMENT Patients received sunitinib at a starting dose of 50 mg per day in repeated 6-week cycles for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks off treatment.
Sunitinib was self-administered orally once daily without regard to meals. Dose reduction for toxicity was allowed to 37.5 until 25 mg/day depending on the type and severity of toxicity encountered.
Sunitinib treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent.
EVALUATION
Baseline evaluations included:
* medical history
* physical examination;
* tumor assessment (total body TC and bone scan )
* assessment of ECOG PS
* QoL assessment
* Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography
* ECG
* Laboratory measurements. Assessment of efficacy and safety
* Evaluation according RECIST criteria every 2 cycles (12 weeks) with TC
* Safety according NCI version 3 every cycle
* QoL every cycle EORTC-QOL-C30.• RESOURCE UTILIZATION ASSESSMENTS
EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, developed by the EORTC for the measurement of quality of life in cancer patients in clinical trials.
For the analysis, the raw scores of the questionnaire are transformed into a 100-point scale. For the functional scales, the computed scores range from 0 to 100, with the higher scores representing a higher level of functioning. For the item scales relative to physical symptoms and financial impact, higher scores represent a higher level of symptoms or problems .
STATISTICAL METHODS
Benefit anticipated (%): \>30% of response rate. Test size: 5%. Power 80%. Sample size: 25 patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SUNITINIB
SUNITINIB
50 MG ORAL, DAYS 1-28 FOLLOWED BY 2 WEEKS RESTING
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SUNITINIB
50 MG ORAL, DAYS 1-28 FOLLOWED BY 2 WEEKS RESTING
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Failure of Cisplatin-gemcitabine regimen as first-line
* Presence of measurable metastases
* Performance status 0-1 ECOG
* Age of 18 years or older
* Written informed consent
* Adequate organ function ( based on tests of hematologic, hepatic, renal and cardiac function).
Exclusion Criteria
* brain metastases
* significant cardiac events within the 6 months prior to study drug administration.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Campania Younger Oncologists Association
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
AGOC
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
DI LORENZO GIUSEPPE, PHD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Campania Younger Oncologists Association
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AGOC O1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.