Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2/PHASE3
125 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-10-31
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of stenting in the neurovasculature to treat cerebral ischemia on other outcomes such as hospital length of stay, charges, and costs.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
VIRTUS: An Evaluation of the Vici™ Venous Stent System in Patients With Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Outflow Obstruction
NCT02112877
S.M.A.R.T.® Nitinol Self-Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Obstructive Superficial Femoral Artery Disease
NCT00739102
Stent Retriever for Thrombectomy Revascularisation of Large Vessel Occlusions in Acute Ischemic Stroke(Catfish)
NCT03820882
Stent Retriever's(TonbridgeMT) Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke(AIS)
NCT03210623
Venous Stent for the Iliofemoral Vein Investigational Clinical Trial Using the DUO Venous Stent System
NCT04580160
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1.2 Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
The primary effectiveness endpoint consists of a composite of the two following outcomes:
* Stroke in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event within 12 months of randomization
* Hard TIA in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event from day 2 through month 12 post-randomization
1.3 Safety Outcomes
Safety outcomes to be collected and reported as part of the overall risk-to-benefit profile for this device are:
* Stroke in any territory within 30 days of randomization
* Death from any cause within 30 days of randomization
* Hard TIA in any territory occurring after a 24 hour post-procedure stabilization period (days 2-30) since the recovery from anesthesia can mask accurate assessment of possible TIA symptoms.
* Intracranial hemorrhage within 30 days of randomization
1.4 Other Outcomes
* Stent Success - PHAROS Vitesse stent deployed across target lesion with residual stenosis 0-20%
* Percentage of Stent Group Subjects with any (symptomatic or asymptomatic) in-stent restenosis ≥ 70% confirmed by angiogram at 12 months
* Percentage of Stent Group Subjects with symptomatic in-stent restenosis ≥ 70% confirmed by angiogram at 12 months
* Percentage of Medical Therapy Group Subjects with interventional procedure (e.g., angioplasty or stent) at 12 months
* Comparison of NIHSS scores between treatment arms
* Comparison of mRS scores between treatment arms
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stent Group
Medical therapy + PHAROS Vitesse neurovascular stent ("Stent Group")
Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System (Stent implantation) + Medical therapy (Aspirin and Clopidogrel)
Implantation of one or more balloon-expandable Pharos Vitesse stents to treat neurovascular ischemic lesions + Medical therapy \[Treatment with aspirin (81-325 mg daily for the duration of the study) and Clopidogrel (75 mg daily for first 3 months)\]
Medical Therapy Group
Medical therapy alone ("Medical Therapy Group")
Aspirin and Clopidogrel (Medical therapy)
Medical therapy alone \[Treatment with aspirin (81-325 mg daily for the duration of the study) and Clopidogrel (75 mg daily for first 3 months)\]
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System (Stent implantation) + Medical therapy (Aspirin and Clopidogrel)
Implantation of one or more balloon-expandable Pharos Vitesse stents to treat neurovascular ischemic lesions + Medical therapy \[Treatment with aspirin (81-325 mg daily for the duration of the study) and Clopidogrel (75 mg daily for first 3 months)\]
Aspirin and Clopidogrel (Medical therapy)
Medical therapy alone \[Treatment with aspirin (81-325 mg daily for the duration of the study) and Clopidogrel (75 mg daily for first 3 months)\]
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Target vessel diameter / lesion length measurements are within one of the below per angiogram:
* Vessel diameter is ≥ 2.0 mm and \< 2.5 mm / lesion length is ≤ 16 mm, or
* Vessel diameter is ≥ 2.5 mm and \< 3.0 mm / lesion length is ≤ 18 mm, or
* Vessel diameter is ≥ 3.0 mm and \< 4.5 mm / lesion length is ≤ 26 mm, or
* Vessel diameter is ≥ 4.5 mm and ≤ 5.0 mm / lesion length is ≤ 31 mm
3. Subject has normal artery adjacent to each stenosis; diameter 2.0 mm - 5.0 mm
4. Subject age is 18-85 years
5. Life expectancy is at least 2 years
6. Subject 's mRS score is ≤ 3
7. Subject is available for study follow-up visits (e.g., lives within 3 hours of research center)
8. Subject is willing and cognitively able to provide Informed Consent (consent may be indicated verbally and signed by neutral witness if stroke has impaired hand or visual function)
Exclusion Criteria
* Extreme tortuosity at, or proximal to, target lesion,
* More than 2 lesions with \> 50% stenosis (including vertebral ostia and common carotid disease),
* Carotid or vertebral dissection
2. CT scan or MRI evidence of any of the following:
* Intracranial hemorrhage of type PH1 or PH2
* Subdural or epidural hemorrhage
* Mass effect, or
* Intracranial tumor (except small meningioma)
3. Subject has a previous stent in the territory of the target lesion(s)
4. Subject has a previous coil or clip placed in the territory of the target lesion within 6 months
5. Subject has a potential source of cardiac embolism requiring anticoagulation therapy (e.g., atrial fibrillation, intracardiac thrombus or vegetation, significant mitral stenosis, mechanical heart valve, congestive heart failure with EF \<30%, or endocarditis)
6. Subject has concurrent intracranial pathology, e.g.
* Moyamoya
* Vasculitis documented by biopsy results
* Ruptured Aneurysm
* Unruptured aneurysm \> 7mm
7. Subject has uncontrolled hypertension (systolic \>185 mmHg or diastolic \>110 mmHg)
8. Hemoglobin \< 10 g/dL; platelet count \< 100,000; or INR \> 1.5 (e.g., use of warfarin)
9. Subject has an uncorrectable bleeding diathesis
10. Subject's neurological status is unstable and rapidly declining (NIHSS score increased \> 4 points within 48 hours prior to randomization)
11. Subject has a contraindication for combination antithrombotic treatment (e.g., clopidogrel and aspirin) such as peptic ulcer disease
12. Subject history indicates high risk of non-compliance (e.g., substance abuse, psychosocial issues, etc.)
13. Subject has a known history contraindicating contrast dye or iodine (vs. sensitivity which can be safely controlled by antihistamine, steroid, etc.)
14. Subject is pregnant or plans to become pregnant in the next 12 months
15. Myocardial infarction within past 3 months
16. Treatment with tPA or other thrombolytic agent within 48 hours prior to randomization
17. Major surgery or trauma within 2 weeks prior to randomization
18. Enrollment in another investigational device or drug study that may confound the results
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Codman & Shurtleff
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Berkefeld J, Hamann GF, du Mesnil R, Kurre W, Steinmetz H, Zanella FE, Sitzer M. [Endovascular treatment for intracranial stenoses. A common statement by neurologists and neuroradiologists]. Nervenarzt. 2006 Dec;77(12):1444-55. doi: 10.1007/s00115-006-2182-z. German.
Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS, Frankel MR, Levine SR, Chaturvedi S, Kasner SE, Benesch CG, Sila CA, Jovin TG, Romano JG; Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 31;352(13):1305-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043033.
Cruz-Flores S, Diamond AL. Angioplasty for intracranial artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD004133. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004133.pub2.
Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI. Angioplasty and stenting for atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis: rationale for a randomized clinical trial. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2007 Aug;17(3):355-63, viii-ix. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2007.05.001.
Fiorella D, Chow MM, Anderson M, Woo H, Rasmussen PA, Masaryk TJ. A 7-year experience with balloon-mounted coronary stents for the treatment of symptomatic vertebrobasilar intracranial atheromatous disease. Neurosurgery. 2007 Aug;61(2):236-42; discussion 242-3. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000255521.42579.31.
Fiorella D, Woo HH. Emerging endovascular therapies for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Stroke. 2007 Aug;38(8):2391-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.482752. Epub 2007 Jun 21. No abstract available.
Zaidat OO, Fitzsimmons BF, Woodward BK, Wang Z, Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Wakhloo A, Gupta R, Kirshner H, Megerian JT, Lesko J, Pitzer P, Ramos J, Castonguay AC, Barnwell S, Smith WS, Gress DR; VISSIT Trial Investigators. Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: the VISSIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015 Mar 24-31;313(12):1240-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1693.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
G080051
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
VISSIT CA-2007-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.