Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
21 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-09-10
2018-09-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Early Feasibility Study Evaluation of an Implant Free Interatrial Shunt to Improve Heart Failure
NCT06859970
C-Pulse® System European Multicenter Study
NCT01872949
Feasibility Study of the Intravascular Ventricular Assist System (iVAS)
NCT02645539
Evaluation of an Implant Free Interatrial Shunt to Improve Heart Failure
NCT05403372
Propensity-Matched Study of Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy in Heart Failure
NCT07209098
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The current need is for a counterpulsation device or method that is effective enough to make its application appealing as a long-term implant to a large number of patients and physicians. It must be simple and safe, with a straight-forward implant procedure, and with long-term measurable patient benefits. Further, it would be advantageous for the counterpulsation device to be smaller, easier to insert, ambulatory, disconnectable, and not in the bloodstream. Such a device may be more readily adopted by a wider group of cardiologists and surgeons, and be suitable for a wider group of people in NYHA Class III or IV heart failure. It is important to point out that a counterpulsation device is aimed to augment native heart function and is fundamentally different from total artificial hearts, left ventricular assist devices and heart transplants which are meant to be a total replacement or an alternative to the native heart. Thus, the counterpulsation device is considered non-obligatory and not life-supporting.
Sunshine Heart, Inc has proposed C-Pulse™, a novel ambulatory, non-obligatory, non-blood contacting extra-ascending aortic counterpulsation system. The C-Pulse™ System is designed to be implanted without the need for cardiopulmonary bypass or extensive dissection, to be able to be activated immediately, to augment heart function in a safe manner and to provide sustained relief from heart failure symptoms. It can be turned off safely, and similarly, in failure modes, is considered to have an associated low risk of death or disability, other than the recurrence of heart failure symptoms. C-Pulse™ is not an alternative to the heart, it is an augmentation device, and it does not preclude the use of therapies that provide full circulatory support such as heart transplantation or LVADs.
The C-Pulse™ System consists of a counterpulsation Cuff secured around the outside of the ascending aorta, the main blood vessel out of the heart. The Cuff and a heart signal sensing wire are attached to an external driver. The external Driver inflates and deflates the Cuff in sequence with the ECG signal to assist heart function and improve the pumping capacity of the heart. The Cuff deflects the aorta in a "thumb-printing" manner which has been optimized to minimize aortic wall strain and maximize blood volume displacement per beat. The C-Pulse™ System is non-blood contacting, simple to insert, and can be turned on and off as required; all natural blood pathways are maintained - there is no exposure of foreign material to the bloodstream.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Implantable Counterpulsation Therapy
The primary study population will include 20 patients enrolled and implanted with C-Pulse. This expansion protocol will allow up to 40 patients to be enrolled and implanted. Patients that meet eligibility will be enrolled and implanted into the treatment arm of the study. These patients will receive the C-Pulse System Implant as intervention therapy. There is not a control arm in this feasibility study.
C-Pulse™ (Implantable Counterpulsation Therapy)
Implantation and activation of counterpulsation therapy for the full duration of the study period. The device may be turned off briefly for personal hygiene, etc.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
C-Pulse™ (Implantable Counterpulsation Therapy)
Implantation and activation of counterpulsation therapy for the full duration of the study period. The device may be turned off briefly for personal hygiene, etc.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ACE inhibitor or ARB (Angiotensin Receptor Blocks) at least 30 days preceding implant or nitrate/hydralazine at the investigators discretion
* Beta-blocker for at least 90 days and stable for 30 days preceding implant
* Patient has left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%
* Patient has had Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) for at least 90 days prior to enrollment or is not indicated for a CRT device
* Patient has had an implanted cardio-defibrillator (ICD) at least 30 days prior to enrollment or is not indicated for ICD implantation.
* Patient is at least 18 years of age and not older than 75 years
* Patient six minute hall walk assessment between 100-350 meters
* Patient understands the nature of the procedure, is willing to comply with associated follow-up evaluations, and provide written informed consent prior to the procedure
Exclusion Criteria
* Ascending aortic calcification on posterior-anterior or lateral chest x-ray at initial screening OR
* Atherosclerotic ascending aortic disease, specifically intimal thickening greater than 3mm or mobile atheroma (moderate) or mural calcification (severe) as detected by CT scan or echocardiography (Echo)
* Patient has ascending aorto-coronary artery bypass grafts, history of aortic dissection, Marfans disease or other connective tissue disorder or has had an aortic root replacement
* Patient aorta not conforming to specified dimensional constraints defined by CT scan, most specifically mid ascending aortic outside diameter less than 29mm or greater than 40mm
* Patient has severe mitral valve incompetence, grade 4+
* Patient has moderate to severe aortic valve incompetence, grade 2-4+
* Patient has systolic blood pressure less than 90 or greater than 140 mmHg
* Patient has a Serum Sodium less than 130 mEq/L
* Patient has a Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) less than 40 ml/min/1.73m2
* Patient has any two of three of Bilirubin, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) greater than three times upper limit of normal
* Patient has a serum Albumin less than 3.0 g/dL
* Patient has Body Mass Index (BMI) less than 18 or greater than 40 kg/m2
* Men with Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2) of greater than 18 ml/kg/min or less than 10 ml/kg/min OR -Women with Peak VO2 of greater than 16 ml/kg/min or less than 9 ml/kg/min
* Patient has any active infection
* Patient has had a myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), cardiac or other major surgery, in the 90 days prior to enrollment
* Patient has severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) as evidenced by Forces Expiratory Volume (FEV1) less than or equal to 0.9 L/min
* Patient requires a concomitant surgical procedure \[i.e. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), Valve repair\]
* Patient is supported with a left ventricular assist device or IABP
* Severe Right Heart Dysfunction with systemic venous congestion evidenced by clinical signs/symptoms such as Central Venous Pressure (CVP) ≥ 20 mmHg, Cardiac Index (CI) \< 2.0 l/min./m2, elevated liver function tests beyond three time the upper limit of normal and presence of ascites
* Patient has reversible causes of heart failure that may be remedied by conventional surgery or other intervention
* Patient is pregnant; Note: Negative pregnancy test required in all women of child bearing potential
* Patient has any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigators, would disqualify the patient for inclusion in the study, limits survival to less than one year, or not permit valid consideration
* Patient is currently enrolled or has participated in the last 30 days in another therapeutic or interventional clinical study that is likely to confound study results
* Patient has symptomatic Carotid artery disease or asymptomatic disease with a stenosis greater than 70%.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nuwellis, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
William T Abraham, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ohio State University
Pat McCarthy, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
St. Paul Heart Clinic
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Mid America Heart Institute-Saint Luke's Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abraham WT, Aggarwal S, Prabhu SD, Cecere R, Pamboukian SV, Bank AJ, Sun B, Pae WE Jr, Hayward CS, McCarthy PM, Peters WS, Verta P, Slaughter MS; C-Pulse Trial Study Group. Ambulatory extra-aortic counterpulsation in patients with moderate to severe chronic heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Oct;2(5):526-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.04.014.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRO02291
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.