The International Collaborative Exfoliation Syndrome Treatment Study
NCT ID: NCT00804115
Last Updated: 2008-12-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
277 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2000-08-31
2008-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: This is a randomized, open-label study to test the hypothesis that improving both pressure-dependent and pressure-independent aqueous outflow and minimizing iridolenticular friction will interfere with the progression of XFS, allow improvement in trabecular function, and be more effective over time than simply reducing aqueous formation. Randomization was performed across the centers, per patient rather than per eye to avoid any crossover effect caused by aqueous suppressants. Group I was treated with latanoprost and pilocarpine, both in the evening, and Group II with Timolol or Cosopt b.i.d. Only one eye per patient was randomized. Patients were followed for 2 years with assessment of IOP, visual field progression, tonographic outflow coefficient and trabecular pigmentation at the 6:00 and 12:00 position.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: A randomized, prospective, international, 12-center, two-year, open-label clinical trial was conducted. XFS patients aged 50-80 years with untreated IOP ≥22 mmHg and open angles with or without mild to moderate glaucomatous damage were included. One eligible eye per patient was randomly assigned to latanoprost and pilocarpine qhs to increase aqueous outflow and inhibit pupillary movement (group I), or to decrease aqueous production with timolol or T/D bid as needed for IOP control (group II). IOP, tonographic outflow facility, and trabecular pigmentation were measured every 6 months.
Results: 277 (146 male) patients (mean age 69.1±6.8 yr, range 50-80 yr)' were enrolled between October 2000 and July 2003. XFS was unilateral in 118 (42.6%) and bilateral in 159 (57.4%) patients. Baseline TM pigmentation at the 6:00 angle was significantly associated with IOP (p=0.01). IOP reduction was 1.3 mmHg greater in Group I (n=145) than in Group II (n=132) (p=0.0003). Mean increase in outflow facility in Group I was 0.005 µl/mmHg/min vs 0 μl/mmHg/min in Group II (p\<0.001). TM pigmentation at the 6:00 position at 24 months decreased from baseline more frequently in Group I than in Group II \[34(26%) vs 20(16%)\] and increased from baseline more frequently in Group II than in Group I \[31(25%) vs 24(18%)\].
Conclusions: Subjects in Group I had lower IOP, improved outflow facility and decreased TM pigmentation. Initial therapy to increase aqueous outflow and interfere with dispersion of exfoliation material and iris pigment by inhibiting pupillary movement is preferable to reducing aqueous secretion, which may be deleterious as primary treatment in this disorder.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Latanoprost in combination with Pilocarpine
Latanoprost with Pilocarpine vs Timolol or Cosopt
Timolol 0.5% bid or Cosopt bid Latanoprost 0.005% qhs Pilocarpine 2%
2
Timolol or Cosopt
Latanoprost with Pilocarpine vs Timolol or Cosopt
Timolol 0.5% bid or Cosopt bid Latanoprost 0.005% qhs Pilocarpine 2%
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Latanoprost with Pilocarpine vs Timolol or Cosopt
Timolol 0.5% bid or Cosopt bid Latanoprost 0.005% qhs Pilocarpine 2%
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Untreated IOP greater than or equal to 22 mmHg in one or both eyes with or without mild to moderate glaucomatous damage and who, in the judgment of the investigator, can be safely washed off from current medical therapy.
3. Age 50-80 years
4. Open angles by gonioscopy
Exclusion Criteria
2. Best corrected visual acuity less than 20/30
3. Untreated IOP greater than 35 mmHg
4. Currently taking systemic beta-blockers
5. Glaucomatous damage sufficiently severe to prevent washout in the opinion of the examiner or visual field defect within 10 degrees of fixation
6. Glaucoma other than exfoliation syndrome
7. Absence of exfoliation material on the lens surface in the eye to be treated
8. Known allergy or sensitivity to any of the study medications
9. Ocular pathology that may interfere with the ability to obtain tonography, visual fields, or accurate IOP readings
10. Angle-closure glaucoma
11. Diabetic retinopathy
12. Previous intraocular or laser surgery.
13. Unwilling or unable to give consent
14. Pregnant or lactating women
50 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pfizer
INDUSTRY
The New York Eye & Ear Infirmary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Glaucoma Associates of New York
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Ritch, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
00.24
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id