Trial Outcomes & Findings for Colesevelam as Add-on to Pioglitazone Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (NCT NCT00789750)

NCT ID: NCT00789750

Last Updated: 2017-06-26

Results Overview

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

562 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline, Week 24

Results posted on

2017-06-26

Participant Flow

The safety set includes all randomized participants who took at least one dose of study medication and have at least one post-baseline safety measurement. The intent-to-treat set includes all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication, and had a baseline and at least one post-baseline HbA1c or FPG measurement.

There was a lead-in period that occurred after participant enrollment, but before randomization.1538 were screened, and a total of 562 participants were randomized.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Colesevelam
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Overall Study
STARTED
280
282
Overall Study
Dropped During run-in Period
6
5
Overall Study
Safety Set
274
277
Overall Study
Intent to Treat Set
271
276
Overall Study
COMPLETED
221
222
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
59
60

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Colesevelam as Add-on to Pioglitazone Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Colesevelam
n=280 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=282 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Total
n=562 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
220 Participants
n=93 Participants
222 Participants
n=4 Participants
442 Participants
n=27 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
60 Participants
n=93 Participants
60 Participants
n=4 Participants
120 Participants
n=27 Participants
Age, Continuous
56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.22 • n=93 Participants
55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.61 • n=4 Participants
56.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.41 • n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
136 Participants
n=93 Participants
106 Participants
n=4 Participants
242 Participants
n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
144 Participants
n=93 Participants
176 Participants
n=4 Participants
320 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
179 Participants
n=93 Participants
172 Participants
n=4 Participants
351 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
59 Participants
n=93 Participants
56 Participants
n=4 Participants
115 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
23 Participants
n=93 Participants
30 Participants
n=4 Participants
53 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
16 Participants
n=93 Participants
21 Participants
n=4 Participants
37 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
5 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
280 participants
n=93 Participants
282 participants
n=4 Participants
562 participants
n=27 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat, last observation carried forward

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=271 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=276 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 24
-0.34 percent
Standard Error 0.083
-0.02 percent
Standard Error 0.083

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Intent to treat set, with baseline and post-baseline measures at the given time point

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=264 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=266 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 4
-0.28 percent
Standard Error 0.037
-0.11 percent
Standard Error 0.037

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Intent to treat set, with baseline and post-baseline measures at the given time point

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=256 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=256 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 8
-0.35 percent
Standard Error 0.055
-0.14 percent
Standard Error 0.056

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Intent to treat set, with baseline and post-baseline measures at the given time point

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=232 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=232 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 16
-0.50 percent
Standard Error 0.078
-0.15 percent
Standard Error 0.078

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat set, with last observation carried forward

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=271 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=276 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Number of Participants Achieving an HbA1c Goal of <7.0%
56 Participants
35 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Participants in the intent-to-treat set with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward

In this study a reduction in FPG of at least 30 mg/dL is considered glycemic response.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=268 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=270 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
-4.8 mg/dL
Standard Error 3.66
9.9 mg/dL
Standard Error 3.66

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat set, with last count carried forward

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=271 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=276 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Number of Participants With a Decrease of >= 0.7 Percent in HbA1c
108 Participants
70 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat set, with last count carried forward

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=271 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=276 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Number of Participants With a Decrease of >= 0.5 Percent in HbA1c
147 Participants
106 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat set, with last count carried forward

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=271 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=276 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Number of Participants With a Reduction in FPG of >= 30 mg/dL
60 Participants
47 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward

TC is measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=263 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=263 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)
-3.4 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.33
3.1 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.32

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last count carried forward

LDL-C is measured in mg/dL

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=262 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=263 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
-9.1 percentage of change
Standard Error 2.14
7.3 percentage of change
Standard Error 2.12

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward

HDL-C is measured in mg/dL

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=263 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=263 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Percent Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
2.9 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.30
1.1 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.30

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward

Non-HDL-C is measured in mg/dL

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=263 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=263 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C
-5.2 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.85
4.6 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.84

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward

TG are measured in mg/dL

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=263 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=263 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)
14.1 percentage of change
Interval -4.32 to 32.52
2.2 percentage of change
Interval -14.6 to 19.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward

Apo A-1 is measured in mg/dL

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=263 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=262 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-I)
3.2 percentage of change
Standard Error 0.92
-0.2 percentage of change
Standard Error 0.92

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward

Apo B is measured in mg/dL

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=263 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=262 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
-5.2 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.51
3.6 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.51

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=246 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=248 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Levels
0.2 µIU/mL
Standard Error 1.76
0.8 µIU/mL
Standard Error 1.76

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=253 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=255 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Change From Baseline in Fasting C-peptide
0.1 ng/mL
Standard Error 0.10
0.3 ng/mL
Standard Error 0.10

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward

HOMA-IR is a calculation of fasting insulin and fasting glucose that shows the level of insulin resistance. Lower numbers are better.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Colesevelam
n=227 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=227 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Change From Baseline in Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
0.2 calculation
Standard Error 0.71
0.3 calculation
Standard Error 0.72

Adverse Events

Colesevelam

Serious events: 11 serious events
Other events: 11 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 17 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Colesevelam
n=274 participants at risk
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=277 participants at risk
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
0.00%
0/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.36%
1/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
0.73%
2/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.36%
1/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
Infections and infestations
Diabetic foot infection
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.00%
0/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.36%
1/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.00%
0/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.36%
1/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.00%
0/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.72%
2/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung squamous cell carcinoma stage unspecified
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
Psychiatric disorders
Bipolar disorder
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Colesevelam
n=274 participants at risk
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Placebo
n=277 participants at risk
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
4.0%
11/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
6.1%
17/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.

Additional Information

Global Clinical Leader

Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

Phone: 9089926400

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee PI agrees to wait until after coordinated multicenter publication or one year after the trial is over, whichever occurs first. After such time, Study Site will submit any publication to DSI for CCI review and comment at least forty-five (45) days prior to submission. Site agrees to delay publication for an additional sixty (60) days for legal (e.g., patent) concerns. Nothing shall be taken as giving DSI any right of editorial control over any publication prepared by Study Site.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER