Trial Outcomes & Findings for Colesevelam as Add-on to Pioglitazone Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (NCT NCT00789750)
NCT ID: NCT00789750
Last Updated: 2017-06-26
Results Overview
COMPLETED
PHASE3
562 participants
Baseline, Week 24
2017-06-26
Participant Flow
The safety set includes all randomized participants who took at least one dose of study medication and have at least one post-baseline safety measurement. The intent-to-treat set includes all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication, and had a baseline and at least one post-baseline HbA1c or FPG measurement.
There was a lead-in period that occurred after participant enrollment, but before randomization.1538 were screened, and a total of 562 participants were randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Colesevelam
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
280
|
282
|
|
Overall Study
Dropped During run-in Period
|
6
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Set
|
274
|
277
|
|
Overall Study
Intent to Treat Set
|
271
|
276
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
221
|
222
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
59
|
60
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Colesevelam as Add-on to Pioglitazone Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=280 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=282 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Total
n=562 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
220 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
222 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
442 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
60 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
120 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.22 • n=93 Participants
|
55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.61 • n=4 Participants
|
56.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.41 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
136 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
106 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
242 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
144 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
176 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
320 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
179 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
172 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
351 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
|
59 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
115 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
23 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
|
16 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
280 participants
n=93 Participants
|
282 participants
n=4 Participants
|
562 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat, last observation carried forward
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=271 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=276 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 24
|
-0.34 percent
Standard Error 0.083
|
-0.02 percent
Standard Error 0.083
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4Population: Intent to treat set, with baseline and post-baseline measures at the given time point
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=264 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=266 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 4
|
-0.28 percent
Standard Error 0.037
|
-0.11 percent
Standard Error 0.037
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8Population: Intent to treat set, with baseline and post-baseline measures at the given time point
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=256 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=256 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 8
|
-0.35 percent
Standard Error 0.055
|
-0.14 percent
Standard Error 0.056
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Intent to treat set, with baseline and post-baseline measures at the given time point
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=232 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=232 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 16
|
-0.50 percent
Standard Error 0.078
|
-0.15 percent
Standard Error 0.078
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat set, with last observation carried forward
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=271 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=276 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Achieving an HbA1c Goal of <7.0%
|
56 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Participants in the intent-to-treat set with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward
In this study a reduction in FPG of at least 30 mg/dL is considered glycemic response.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=268 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=270 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
|
-4.8 mg/dL
Standard Error 3.66
|
9.9 mg/dL
Standard Error 3.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat set, with last count carried forward
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=271 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=276 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a Decrease of >= 0.7 Percent in HbA1c
|
108 Participants
|
70 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat set, with last count carried forward
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=271 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=276 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a Decrease of >= 0.5 Percent in HbA1c
|
147 Participants
|
106 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat set, with last count carried forward
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=271 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=276 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a Reduction in FPG of >= 30 mg/dL
|
60 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward
TC is measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=263 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=263 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)
|
-3.4 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.33
|
3.1 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last count carried forward
LDL-C is measured in mg/dL
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=262 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=263 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
|
-9.1 percentage of change
Standard Error 2.14
|
7.3 percentage of change
Standard Error 2.12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward
HDL-C is measured in mg/dL
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=263 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=263 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
|
2.9 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.30
|
1.1 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.30
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward
Non-HDL-C is measured in mg/dL
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=263 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=263 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C
|
-5.2 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.85
|
4.6 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward
TG are measured in mg/dL
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=263 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=263 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)
|
14.1 percentage of change
Interval -4.32 to 32.52
|
2.2 percentage of change
Interval -14.6 to 19.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward
Apo A-1 is measured in mg/dL
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=263 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=262 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-I)
|
3.2 percentage of change
Standard Error 0.92
|
-0.2 percentage of change
Standard Error 0.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward
Apo B is measured in mg/dL
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=263 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=262 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
|
-5.2 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.51
|
3.6 percentage of change
Standard Error 1.51
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=246 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=248 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Levels
|
0.2 µIU/mL
Standard Error 1.76
|
0.8 µIU/mL
Standard Error 1.76
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=253 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=255 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting C-peptide
|
0.1 ng/mL
Standard Error 0.10
|
0.3 ng/mL
Standard Error 0.10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: Intent-to-treat set, with values at both baseline and Week 24 with last observation carried forward
HOMA-IR is a calculation of fasting insulin and fasting glucose that shows the level of insulin resistance. Lower numbers are better.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=227 Participants
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=227 Participants
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
|
0.2 calculation
Standard Error 0.71
|
0.3 calculation
Standard Error 0.72
|
Adverse Events
Colesevelam
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=274 participants at risk
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=277 participants at risk
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.00%
0/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.36%
1/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
|
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.73%
2/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.36%
1/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diabetic foot infection
|
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.36%
1/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.36%
1/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.72%
2/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung squamous cell carcinoma stage unspecified
|
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Bipolar disorder
|
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.36%
1/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
0.00%
0/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Colesevelam
n=274 participants at risk
Colesevelam tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
Placebo
n=277 participants at risk
Placebo tablets with pioglitazone therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
4.0%
11/274 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
6.1%
17/277 • Adverse events that first occurred or worsened in severity after initiation of treatment with the investigational product and up to the end of study assessment and follow-up period, within 3 years, 3 months
Four potential cardiac events were referred to the Clinical Event Committee (CEC) for adjudication: 1 event was adjudicated as stroke and was considered unrelated to study treatment, while 3 were adjudicated as noncardiac chest pain. No serious adverse events in either treatment group were considered drug-related.
|
Additional Information
Global Clinical Leader
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee PI agrees to wait until after coordinated multicenter publication or one year after the trial is over, whichever occurs first. After such time, Study Site will submit any publication to DSI for CCI review and comment at least forty-five (45) days prior to submission. Site agrees to delay publication for an additional sixty (60) days for legal (e.g., patent) concerns. Nothing shall be taken as giving DSI any right of editorial control over any publication prepared by Study Site.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER