Colesevelam as Add-on to Pioglitazone Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

NCT ID: NCT00789750

Last Updated: 2017-06-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

562 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-04-30

Study Completion Date

2012-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The current study investigates colesevelam as add-on therapy to pioglitazone to improve glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus not adequately controlled with pioglitazone monotherapy or pioglitazone in combination with either metformin or a sulfonylurea. The study will evaluate if colesevelam add-on to pioglitazone therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus will be safe, well tolerated, and efficacious.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Colesevelam

Participants receive six colesevelam tablets (3.8 grams/day) in addition to pioglitazone-based therapy (30 mg or 45 mg)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Colesevelam

Intervention Type DRUG

Colesevelam 625 mg tablets

Pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

30 mg or 45 mg pioglitazone therapy

Placebo

Participants receive six placebo tablets in addition to pioglitazone-based therapy (30 mg or 45 mg)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablets appearing to be colesevelam

Pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

30 mg or 45 mg pioglitazone therapy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Colesevelam

Colesevelam 625 mg tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo tablets appearing to be colesevelam

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone

30 mg or 45 mg pioglitazone therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Welchol No drug Actos

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus
* Inadequate glycemic control on a stable dose (at least 2 months prior to screening) of pioglitazone at 30 or 45 mg/day, with or without one or two other oral antidiabetic medications \[metformin or a sulfonylurea, or dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP-IV) inhibitor\]
* Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) \>= 7.5% and =\< 9.5% at screening
* Fasting plasma glucose =\<240 mg/dL at randomization (Week 0/Day 1).
* Male or female \>= 18 years of age.
* Women of childbearing potential must be using an adequate method of contraception as detailed per-protocol
* Fasting C-peptide level \>0.5 ng/mL at screening
* Clinically stable in regards to medical conditions other than type 2 diabetes
* Concomitant medications are at stable doses for at least 30 days prior to enrollment, and are not anticipated to need adjustment during the study period

Exclusion Criteria

* History of Type 1 diabetes and/or history of ketoacidosis
* History of bowel obstruction
* History of hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis
* Fasting serum triglyceride concentration \>500 mg/dL
* History of dysphagia, swallowing disorders, gastroparesis, other gastrointestinal motility disorders, major gastrointestinal surgery
* History of insulin use \>= 2 weeks duration during the previous 3 months or a total of \>2 months insulin therapy at any time prior to screening
* Treatment with bile acid sequestrants, including colesevelam within 3 months prior to screening
* Female subject who is pregnant or breastfeeding
* History of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, or any revascularization within 6 months prior to screening
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Daiichi Sankyo

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Global Clinical Leader

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Daiichi Sankyo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Green Valley, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Searcy, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Buena Park, California, United States

Site Status

Burbank, California, United States

Site Status

Chino, California, United States

Site Status

Garden Grove, California, United States

Site Status

Huntington Park, California, United States

Site Status

La Mirada, California, United States

Site Status

Lincoln, California, United States

Site Status

Lomita, California, United States

Site Status

Los Gatos, California, United States

Site Status

Modesto, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Delray Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gulf Breeze, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ormond Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pinellas Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sanford, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Vero Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Wellington, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

East Point, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Stockbridge, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Tucker, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Waycross, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Nampa, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Bloomington, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

La Porte, Indiana, United States

Site Status

South Bend, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Crestview Hills, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lafayette, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Prince Frederick, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Silver Spring, Maryland, United States

Site Status

New Bedford, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Southfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Port Gibson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Belvidere, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Berlin, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Clifton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Lumberton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Mine Hill, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New Windsor, New York, United States

Site Status

North Massapequa, New York, United States

Site Status

Tonawanda, New York, United States

Site Status

West Seneca, New York, United States

Site Status

Lexington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Statesville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Marion, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Shaker Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Stow, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Jersey Shore, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Upper Saint Clair, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Murfreesboro, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

New Tazewell, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Grand Prairie, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tomball, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Alexandria, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Danville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Manassas, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Salem, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Suffolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Lakewood, Washington, United States

Site Status

Kenosha, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rosenstock J, Truitt KE, Baz-Hecht M, Ford DM, Tao B, Chou HS. Efficacy and safety of colesevelam in combination with pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Horm Metab Res. 2014 Dec;46(13):943-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383648. Epub 2014 Jul 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25054436 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WEL-A-U306

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.