Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
76 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-01-31
2008-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of a High Add Multi Focal Contact Lens
NCT01518868
Evaluating the Success of Habitual Multifocal Wearers When Refit With a New Lens Design
NCT04952701
Performance of Rigid Gas Permeable (RGP) Scleral Contact Lenses With a Passive Artificial Iris
NCT04040790
Marketed Contact Lens Real World Through Focus Curve
NCT02679976
Clinical Evaluation of Two Daily Disposable Lenses in Sphere Design
NCT05516082
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Of the ten Test subjects who discontinued, Difficulty Cleaning Lenses (3 subjects) and Poor Comfort (2 subjects), Poor Vision (1 subject) and Poor Vision and Poor Comfort (2 subjects) accounted for 80% of the discontinuations. Two Control subjects discontinued, one for Loss of Interest and one for Poor Comfort There were no adverse events reported during the study. The only study related complications were slit lamp findings of grade 3 for injection. Each of these resolved without complication.
Slit lamp findings were reported at frequencies within expected values and the positive slit lamp observations were primarily grade 1 (trace). Staining and injection were reported most frequently. Subject reports of no symptoms were lowest at the 1 week visit for both the Completed Test and Control eyes and then increased over the remainder of the study. Discomfort was reported most frequently (13.7% of Completed Test eye visits and 12.3% of Completed Control Eye visits). .
Lens comfort was rated as an average of 4.04 (very good) for the Completed Test eyes and 4.07 (very good) for the Completed Control eyes. This compared to a baseline value of 3.96 for the Test eyes and 4.23 for the Control eyes with the pre-study habitual correction.
Keratometry changes were within 1.00 diopter for 93.1% of the Completed Test eyes and 96.4% of the Completed Control eyes. Manifest refraction changes were within 1.00 diopter for 97.9% of the Completed Test eyes and 98.2% of the Completed Control eyes.
One eye of the 63 Completed Test eyes targeted for full distance vision was reported to show a decrease in contact lens visual acuity from the baseline best corrected visual acuity of greater than 0.20 logMAR. The reason for the loss was a reported baseline measurement error. One eye of the 48 Completed Control eyes targeted for full distance vision was reported to show a decrease in contact lens visual acuity from the baseline best corrected visual acuity of greater than 0.20 logMAR. The reason cited for the decrease was lenses being switched eye for eye.
Average lens wearing time was stable at over 13 hours per day for the Completed Test and Control subjects and showed a decrease over time for the discontinued eyes.
Forty nine (49) lens replacements were made for 40 of the 152 eyes dispensed in the study. The replacements were predominantly for deposits (8) or parameter and power change (21) which together account for 59% of the lens replacements. Discomfort was cited for 18.4% (5 test and 4 control lenses) of the lens replacements. Five lenses (10%) were replaced due to loss.
The results of the clinical evaluation of the Paragon HDS HI 1.54™ contact lenses provide evidence of substantial equivalence to the historical control, Paragon Fluroperm® 30 contact lenses.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
FluoroPerm 30 RGP lens daily wear
FluoroPerm 30 RGP; paflufocon C
Contact lens daily wear
HDS HI 1.54
New rigid gas permeable contact lens material material
HDS HI 1.54; pahrifocon A
Contact Lens
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HDS HI 1.54; pahrifocon A
Contact Lens
FluoroPerm 30 RGP; paflufocon C
Contact lens daily wear
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The prospective eye(s) must have naturally occurring refractive myopia up to -20.00 D or hyperopia or aphakia up to +20.00 D sphere (spectacle plane), with less than 10.00 D of refractive astigmatism (spectacle plane), as determined by manifest refraction (phoropter or trial frame with a 12.5 mm vertex distance). Subjects must have best spectacle corrected visual acuity of at least 0.30 logMAR (20/40) in each eye.
3. All subjects must be treated bilaterally.
4. Subjects must be willing and capable to return for all scheduled follow-up visits for a period of at least 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subjects with a history of any of the following medical conditions: collagen vascular disease, autoimmune disease, immunodeficiency diseases, ocular herpes zoster or simplex, endocrine disorders (including, but not limited to active thyroid disorders and diabetes), lupus, and rheumatoid arthritis.
NOTE: The presence of diabetes (either type 1 or 2), regardless of disease duration, severity or control, will specifically exclude subjects from eligibility.
3. Subjects with a history of intraocular or corneal surgery (excluding cataract extraction and refractive surgery), active ophthalmic disease or abnormality (including, but not limited to, blepharitis, recurrent corneal erosion, dry eye syndrome, neovascularization \> 1mm from limbus), clinically significant lens opacity, clinical evidence of trauma (including scarring), or with evidence of glaucoma or propensity for narrow angle glaucoma as determined by gonioscopic examination in either eye.
NOTE: This includes any patient with open angle glaucoma, regardless of medication regimen or control. Additionally, any patient with an IOP greater than 21 mm Hg at baseline is specifically excluded from eligibility.
4. Subjects with evidence of keratoconus, corneal irregularity, or abnormal videokeratography in either eye.
5. Subjects who are participating in any other clinical trial (FDA or other).
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CooperVision International Limited (CVIL)
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jerome A. Legerton, OD, MS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Consultant to Paragon Vision Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mission Optometry
Lake Elsinore, California, United States
Eyecare Consultants
Englewood, Colorado, United States
Vision Care Associates
East Lansing, Michigan, United States
Koetting Associates
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Visionary Eye Associates
Rochester, New York, United States
Western Reserve Vision Care
Beachwood, Ohio, United States
Choate Eye Associates
Goodlettsville, Tennessee, United States
Twin Lakes Vision Clinic
Federal Way, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PVS-07-07
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
HDSHI154
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.