Influenza Vaccine in HIV

NCT ID: NCT00764998

Last Updated: 2017-04-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

285 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-10-31

Study Completion Date

2009-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purposes of this research study are:

1. to see if there is a difference in the quantity of protective influenza antibodies produced by different doses of the Fluviral vaccine
2. to see if these different vaccine dosing schedules reduce flu-like illness and/or reduce laboratory documented influenza in HIV Infected adults.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Immune compromised individuals are at risk for infection with influenza and more likely to manifest more severe symptoms of influenza disease. Furthermore, they are influenza vaccine hyporesponsive in comparison to healthy, adult immune competent individuals. One population of immune compromised Canadians at risk for severe influenza disease is those living with HIV infection. At least 56,000 Canadians are HIV infected \[1\]. This population is at risk for more severe influenza illness. Influenza viral replication and shedding is prolonged and the duration of influenza symptomatology is longer in those with HIV \[2, 3\]. Furthermore, influenza-related mortality rates in HIV infected individuals are increased \[4\]. The HIV population is known to be hyporesponsive to vaccinations, including influenza. The efficacy of influenza vaccines is compromised, in part, by reduced antibody responses observed in HIV infected individuals \[5\]. Nevertheless, influenza vaccination is recommended for HIV-infected individuals \[6, 7\]. The Centers of Disease Control guidelines state: "Influenza can result in serious illness and because vaccination with inactivated influenza vaccine might result in the production of protective antibody titers, vaccination might benefit HIV-infected persons. Therefore, influenza vaccination is recommended". As influenza vaccination is the cornerstone of public health interventions intended to protect the population against influenza, vaccine hyporesponsiveness in immune compromised populations represents a significant concern. Given the risk of influenza exposure in general as well as concerns related to poor vaccine efficacy and more severe influenza disease in immune compromised populations such as those living with HIV, strategies to improve vaccine efficacy are required.

Therefore a total of 5 conditions provide justification for a trial to be conducted at this time:

1. current standard treatment with influenza vaccine is less efficacious when used in particular subgroups of immune compromised individuals, such as those diagnosed with HIV
2. there exists a significant burden of influenza infection in HIV patients that must be addressed in terms of identifying an effective treatment strategy
3. past randomized trials of influenza vaccination in HIV patients are of limited comparability to today's relevant base of patients, and alternative vaccination strategies require assessment
4. efficacy of booster doses of influenza vaccine in HIV patients remains in question as a consequence of methodologic shortcomings in terms of both design aspects and outcomes measured of past studies
5. there is a paucity of published evidence assessing the efficacy of an increased, double-dose of influenza vaccine in this patient population.

References

1. Boulos, D., et al., Estimates of HIV prevalence and incidence in Canada, 2005. Can Commun Dis Rep, 2006. 32(15): p. 165-74.
2. Safrin, S., J.D. Rush, and J. Mills, Influenza in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Chest, 1990. 98(1): p. 33-7.
3. Radwan, H.M., et al., Influenza in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients during the 1997-1998 influenza season. Clin Infect Dis, 2000. 31(2): p. 604-6.
4. Zanetti, A.R., et al., Safety and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in individuals infected with HIV. Vaccine, 2002. 20 Suppl 5: p. B29-32.
5. Malaspina, A., et al., Compromised B cell responses to influenza vaccination in HIV-infected individuals. J Infect Dis, 2005. 191(9): p. 1442-50.
6. Health Canada Progress towards Canadian target coverage rates in Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunications., in Available at: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/ccdr-rmtc/01vol27/dr2710eb.htlm. Accessed 8 December 2006. 2006.
7. Prevention and Control of Influenza. Recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practice, in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Morbidity and Morality Weekly Report. 2006. p. Vol 55/RR-10.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Influenza HIV

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fluviral

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fluviral

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Fluviral

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fluviral

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

non applicable

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 - \< 60 years
* HIV positive
* Able to provide signed, informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Receipt or anticipated requirement of any blood product, vaccine, or immunoglobulin preparation within one month of study vaccine administration until completion of study.
* Immunosuppressive therapy including prednisone, immune modulators, subjects undergoing dialysis, autoimmune dysfunction (including rheumatoid arthritis, lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis)
* Alcohol consumption \> 4 drinks per day (1 drink is equal to a 12-ounce can of beer, or a 5-ounce glass of wine or one cocktail with 1 1/2-ounces alcohol)
* History of cancer, with the exception of cutaneous cancers including Kaposi Sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma and non-invasive HPV-related malignancy
* Known or suspected hypersensitivity to any component of the study vaccines, including chicken eggs or egg products and thimerosol
* History of immediate hypersensitivity reaction and/or reaction resulting in neurological symptoms to a previous dose of any influenza vaccine
* Presentation with or any recent history (within 24 hours) of any febrile illness (\> 38 C) or symptoms of significant local or systemic infection - such subjects will be deferred from enrollment at least until one week after the illness has resolved
* Any other condition which in the opinion of the Investigator might interfere with evaluation of the study objectives.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ontario HIV Treatment Network

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Curtis Cooper, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

OHRI

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Southern Alberta Clinic

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

University of Alberta Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

BC Center for Excellence in HIV/Aids

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Downtown Immunodeficiency Clinic / UBC

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

QEII HSC, Victoria General Hospital Site

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

McMaster University Medical Center

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Infectious Disease Care Program

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

University of Ottawa Health Services

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook Health Science Center

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

HIV Care Program - Windsor Regional Hospital

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Immunodeficiency Service, Montreal Chest Institute

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cooper C, Thorne A, Klein M, Conway B, Boivin G, Haase D, Shafran S, Zubyk W, Singer J, Halperin S, Walmsley S; CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Influenza Vaccine Research Group. Immunogenicity is not improved by increased antigen dose or booster dosing of seasonal influenza vaccine in a randomized trial of HIV infected adults. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 25;6(3):e17758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017758.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21512577 (View on PubMed)

Nosyk B, Sharif B, Sun H, Cooper C, Anis AH; CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Influenza Vaccine Research Group. The cost-effectiveness and value of information of three influenza vaccination dosing strategies for individuals with human immunodeficiency virus. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e27059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027059. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22162988 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CTN237

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Early Versus Delayed Pneumococcal Vaccination in HIV
NCT00137605 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2