Immunogenicity, Safety, and Tolerability of MF59-Adjuvanted Versus Non-Adjuvanted Influenza Vaccines in Patients With HIV-1 Infection
NCT ID: NCT01032408
Last Updated: 2013-06-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
154 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-04-30
2012-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Because certain individuals may be hypo-responsive to influenza vaccination, additional studies with high-risk groups are warranted in order to determine the optimal vaccine formulation and dosing schedule for prevention of novel H1N1 virus infection.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety of and Immunogenicity to an H1N1 Influenza Vaccine in HIV-infected Adults
NCT01155037
Evaluating the Safety and Immune Response to an HIV Vaccine in Healthy, HIV-Uninfected Adults Who Have Participated in Previous HIV Vaccine Clinical Trials and in Adults Who Have Not Participated in Previous HIV Vaccine Clinical Trials
NCT01376726
Active Immunization of HIV-Infected Pregnant Women: A Phase I Study of Safety and Immunogenicity of a rgp120/HIV-1 Vaccine (NOTE: Some Patients Receive Placebo)
NCT00001046
Serological Responses to Adjuvanted Versus Non-adjuvanted Influenza Vaccines Among People With HIV: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07126652
A Phase I Comparative Blinded Trial of Several HIV-1 Derived Immunogens in Infected Individuals With >= 500 CD4 Cells/mm3
NCT00000779
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HIV-1 Infected Subjects Receiving Vaccine with Adjuvant
Each subject received two doses of vaccine with adjuvant (Focetria®), the first on Study Day 1, and the second on Study Day 22
Focetria®
7.5 ug of HA antigen; adjuvanted; monovalent
HIV-1 Infected Subjects Receiving Vaccine without Adjuvant
Each subject received two doses of vaccine without adjuvant (Begrivac®), the first on Study Day 1, and the second on Study Day 22
Begrivac®
15 ug of HA antigen; non-adjuvanted; trivalent
Healthy Subjects Receiving Vaccine with Adjuvant
Each subject received two doses of vaccine with adjuvant (Focetria®), the first on Study Day 1, and the second on Study Day 22
Focetria®
7.5 ug of HA antigen; adjuvanted; monovalent
Healthy Subjects Receiving Vaccine without Adjuvant
Each subject received two doses of vaccine without adjuvant (Begrivac®), the first on Study Day 1, and the second on Study Day 22
Begrivac®
15 ug of HA antigen; non-adjuvanted; trivalent
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Focetria®
7.5 ug of HA antigen; adjuvanted; monovalent
Begrivac®
15 ug of HA antigen; non-adjuvanted; trivalent
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adults between 18-60 years old (inclusive)
* Any sex or ethnicity
* Confirmed Diagnosis of HIV-1 infection
* CD4+ cells count \>200 per mm3 within 3 months prior to inclusion in the study
* HIV-1 viral load below 200 copies/mL within 90 days prior to inclusion in the study
* Childbearing potential women must be willing to use an acceptable contraceptive method. Acceptable contraceptive methods are defined as one or more of the following:
1. Hormone contraceptive (such as oral, injectable, transdermal patch, subcutaneous implant, cervical ring)
2. Barrier (condom with spermicide or diaphragm with spermicide) at each intercourse and during the whole intercourse
3. Intra-uterine device (IUD)
4. Monogamous relation with vasectomized partner (must have been vasectomized at least six months before the volunteer entered the study)
* No changes in the antiviral therapy (including HAART) for the previous 4 weeks and/or change in the predicted antiviral therapy through study Day 43 (3 weeks after the second dose of the vaccine)
* No use of immunomodulatory therapy, including cyclosporine, interleukins, interferons, or systemic glucocorticoids (including inhalatory) within 3 months before study inclusion
* Subjects capable of respecting all the study procedures and available for all visits scheduled to the investigation site
* Subjects capable of understanding the nature and risk of the study proposed and signing the consent form
* The subjects may have other underlying diseases, such as, but not limited to, hypertension, diabetes, cardiac ischemic disease, or hypothyroidism, however their symptoms/signs must be currently under control with medical treatment according to the investigator's evaluation
For Healthy Adults:
* Adults between 18-60 years old (inclusive)
* Any sex and ethnicity
* Subjects with good health as determined by medical history, physical evaluation, and investigator's clinical opinion
* Childbearing potential women must be willing to use an acceptable contraceptive method. Acceptable contraceptive methods are defined as one or more of the following:
1. Hormone contraceptive (such as oral, injectable, transdermal patch, subcutaneous implant, cervical ring).
2. Barrier (condom with spermicide or diaphragm with spermicide) at each intercourse and during the whole sexual intercourse
3. Intra-uterine device (IUD)
4. Monogamous relation with vasectomized partner (must have been vasectomized for at least six months before the volunteer entered the study)
* Subjects capable of respecting all the study procedures and available for all the visits scheduled at the investigation site
* Subjects capable of understanding the nature and risk of the study proposed and signing the consent form
There will be NO blood sample collection of healthy volunteers viewing the determination of their serological status regarding the HIV virus.
Exclusion Criteria
* HIV-1 viral load above 500 copies/mL within 6 months prior to inclusion in the study
* Previous laboratory confirmed diagnosis of an infection by the novel H1N1 virus
* Receipt of another vaccine against the novel H1N1 virus within 3 months prior to inclusion in the study
* Any recent vaccine given within the last 21 days (inclusive)
* History of allergic reaction to an influenza vaccine in the past, or a current or previous occurrence of allergy to egg or egg protein, kanamycin, and neomycin sulfate
* Acute febrile disease (vaccination may be delayed up to 3 days after the resolution of the symptoms)
* History of cancer, except for skin cancer, including Kaposi's Sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, and non-invasive malignancy related to HPV
* History of cognitive disorders
* History of progressive or severe neurological disorders, including Guillain-Barré Syndrome
* Pregnancy or breast-feeding
* Use of immunomodulatory therapy, including cyclosporin, interleukins, and interferons, within 3 months prior to inclusion in the study
* Receipt of parenteral immunoglobulin, hemotherapy, and/or plasma derivatives within 3 months prior to inclusion in the study
* Projected life expectancy lower than 12 months
* Receipt of any investigational product within 12 months prior to inclusion in the study
For Healthy Adults:
* Previous laboratory confirmed diagnosis of an infection by the novel H1N1 virus
* Receipt of another vaccine against the novel H1N1 virus within 3 months prior to inclusion in the study
* Any recent vaccine given within the last 21 days (inclusive)
* History of allergic reaction to influenza vaccine in the past, or a current or previous allergy to egg or egg protein, kanamycin, and neomycin sulfate
* Acute febrile disease (the vaccination may be delayed up to 3 days after symptoms resolution)
* Pregnancy or breast-feeding
* Receipt of parenteral immunoglobulin, hemotherapy, and/or plasma derivatives within 3 months prior to inclusion in the study
* Receipt of any investigational product within 12 months prior to inclusion in the study
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chiltern Pesquisa Clinica Ltda
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centro Médico São Francisco
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
ICG - Instituto Centro de Genomas
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Clark TW, Pareek M, Hoschler K, Dillon H, Nicholson KG, Groth N, Stephenson I. Trial of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) monovalent MF59-adjuvanted vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 17;361(25):2424-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907650. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team; Dawood FS, Jain S, Finelli L, Shaw MW, Lindstrom S, Garten RJ, Gubareva LV, Xu X, Bridges CB, Uyeki TM. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 18;360(25):2605-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903810. Epub 2009 May 7.
Evison J, Farese S, Seitz M, Uehlinger DE, Furrer H, Muhlemann K. Randomized, double-blind comparative trial of subunit and virosomal influenza vaccines for immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 May 15;48(10):1402-12. doi: 10.1086/598193.
Fine AD, Bridges CB, De Guzman AM, Glover L, Zeller B, Wong SJ, Baker I, Regnery H, Fukuda K. Influenza A among patients with human immunodeficiency virus: an outbreak of infection at a residential facility in New York City. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Jun 15;32(12):1784-91. doi: 10.1086/320747. Epub 2001 May 16.
Kunisaki KM, Janoff EN. Influenza in immunosuppressed populations: a review of infection frequency, morbidity, mortality, and vaccine responses. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009 Aug;9(8):493-504. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70175-6.
Ranieri R, Veronelli A, Santambrogio C, Pontiroli AE. Impact of influenza vaccine on response to vaccination with pneumococcal vaccine in HIV patients. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2005 May;21(5):407-9. doi: 10.1089/aid.2005.21.407.
Sullivan PS, Hanson DL, Dworkin MS, Jones JL, Ward JW; Adult and Adolescent Spectrum of HIV Disease Investigators. Effect of influenza vaccination on disease progression among HIV-infected persons. AIDS. 2000 Dec 1;14(17):2781-5. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200012010-00018.
Tasker SA, Treanor JJ, Paxton WB, Wallace MR. Efficacy of influenza vaccination in HIV-infected persons. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Sep 21;131(6):430-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-6-199909210-00006.
Yamanaka H, Teruya K, Tanaka M, Kikuchi Y, Takahashi T, Kimura S, Oka S; HIV/Influenza Vaccine Study Team. Efficacy and immunologic responses to influenza vaccine in HIV-1-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005 Jun 1;39(2):167-73.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
V111_14TP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.