Electroencephalography (EEG) Biomarkers of Response in Depression

NCT ID: NCT00759122

Last Updated: 2008-09-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-11-30

Study Completion Date

2005-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are two specific aims of this project:

1. To identify physiologic indicators of venlafaxine treatment response using quantitative EEG (QEEG) cordance, and to determine if cordance changes are specifically associated with response to venlafaxine
2. To identify predictors of placebo response in major depression using QEEG cordance/bispectral index (BIS) and neuropsychological testing

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Our previous work indicates that a combination of neurophysiologic, symptom, and cognitive measures may predict response more accurately than brain functional measures alone. The purpose of this study is to replicate results from our earlier work using a similar study design (96-06-291-11), and also to prospectively gather additional information to substantiate that a more comprehensive approach to subject assessment will yield more accurate and reproducible prediction of treatment response.

One of the major challenges involved in clinical trials for major depressive disorder (MDD) is that of placebo response. The placebo response rate has been estimated at 20 - 50% of those subjects who enter a standard clinical trial for MDD. This high rate of response to placebo, which may not differ substantially from the response rate to medication, can make it difficult to demonstrate the efficacy of new antidepressant compounds. Identification of MDD subjects with a placebo responder (PR) phenotype, either at the beginning or end of a clinical trial, could have two major potential benefits. First, identification of placebo responders prior to enrollment in a clinical trial might make it possible to have restrictive entry criteria, excluding such subjects from the trial. Segregation of PR phenotype subjects a priori could reduce variance in the outcome data and increase the drug-placebo difference. This exclusion could reduce the number of subjects required for clinical trials and render the trials more efficient. Second, identification of a PR phenotype during a clinical trial could make it possible to distinguish "true medication" from placebo response. This distinction could make it possible to identify subgroups in the trial, enhancing precision in the study of medication effects.

Our research group has performed a series of placebo-controlled treatment trials in MDD and has used a combination of behavioral ratings, self-report, and neurophysiologic measurements with quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) to identify predictors of both placebo response and medication response. The preliminary results from previous studies suggest that a combination of neurophysiologic, symptom, and cognitive measures may be useful for pretreatment prediction and/or early treatment detection of different types of treatment response.

In this study our primary goal is to assess the neurophysiologic, behavioral, and cognitive assessments of subjects with MDD in the setting of a clinical trial to replicate prospectively these initial results and more completely identify the characteristics of different types of treatment response in a clinical trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

mdd major depressive disorder depression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

VENLAFAXINE

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

venlafaxine (Effexor)

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching capsules containing venlafaxine 37.5 mg. WERE prepared by the UCLA Pharmacy for the initial phase of the study. After a one-week placebo lead-in, subjects WERE randomly assigned to receive one capsule of either venlafaxine or placebo, with the dosage increase every two days until subjects received four capsules daily (subjects achieved a dose of 150 mg. of venlafaxine after 10 days). The first dose was administered in the morning, with subsequent capsules added on a b.i.d. schedule.

2

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching capsules containing placebo 37.5 mg. WERE prepared by the UCLA Pharmacy for the initial phase of the study. After a one-week placebo lead-in, subjects WERE randomly assigned to receive one capsule of either venlafaxine or placebo, with the dosage increase every two days until subjects received four capsules daily (subjects achieved a dose of 150 mg. of venlafaxine after 10 days). The first dose was administered in the morning, with subsequent capsules added on a b.i.d. schedule.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

venlafaxine (Effexor)

Matching capsules containing venlafaxine 37.5 mg. WERE prepared by the UCLA Pharmacy for the initial phase of the study. After a one-week placebo lead-in, subjects WERE randomly assigned to receive one capsule of either venlafaxine or placebo, with the dosage increase every two days until subjects received four capsules daily (subjects achieved a dose of 150 mg. of venlafaxine after 10 days). The first dose was administered in the morning, with subsequent capsules added on a b.i.d. schedule.

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

Matching capsules containing placebo 37.5 mg. WERE prepared by the UCLA Pharmacy for the initial phase of the study. After a one-week placebo lead-in, subjects WERE randomly assigned to receive one capsule of either venlafaxine or placebo, with the dosage increase every two days until subjects received four capsules daily (subjects achieved a dose of 150 mg. of venlafaxine after 10 days). The first dose was administered in the morning, with subsequent capsules added on a b.i.d. schedule.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All subjects will meet DSM-IV criteria for depression on the basis of a SCID-P interview, with subjects having a score on the 17-item Ham-D \> 17 (with item #1 \> 2).
* Subjects will meet criteria both at recruitment and after a one-week single blind placebo wash-in. Study includes outpatients only.

Exclusion Criteria

* All subjects will have no serious medical illness. The investigators will exclude patients also meeting criteria for the following groups of axis I diagnoses:

* delirium or dementia
* substance-related disorders
* schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, or eating disorders.
* In addition, patients meeting criteria for cluster A or B axis II diagnoses will be excluded.
* Subjects with a history of current or past active suicidal ideation, or suicide attempts will be excluded from the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic - MITG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ian A Cook, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCLA Laboratory of Brain, Behavior, and Pharmacology

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Biomarkers in MDD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id