Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-03-31
2009-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
B. Specific Aims/Hypothesis:
1. To determine if reduction in caffeine intake decreases urinary frequency, nocturia and incontinence episodes as measured on a 3-day voiding diary in women with Overactive Bladder (OAB).
We hypothesize that women with overactive bladder will report less frequent urination and decreased nocturia and incontinence episodes with caffeine reduction.
2. To determine whether caffeine reduction results in decreased symptom severity and bother and improved quality of life scores as measured by the Questionnaire for Incontinence Severity Index (ISI), Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID), Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7).
We hypothesize that women with OAB who reduce their intake of caffeine will report decreased symptom bother and improved quality of life as measured by the ISI, UDI-6 and the IIQ-
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Caffeine Reduction and Anticholinergic Medications for Treatment of Overactive Bladder
NCT00780832
Pilot Trial in Sleep Laboratory Setting to Compare the Physiology of Night Time Bladder Function in Subjects With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Versus Subjects That Have Insomnia and Healthy Normal Subjects
NCT01029015
A Pilot Trial in a Sleep Laboratory Setting to Observe Night Time Bladder Function of Subjects With Overactive Bladder (OAB)
NCT01099345
Local Anesthetic Treatments for Overactive Bladder
NCT00427648
Overactive Bladder (OAB) Drink Advice Study
NCT00982241
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: Women with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms who scored a 6 on the Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis and who consumed at least 200 mg of caffeine daily were recruited. After completing baseline 3-day bladder diaries including amount and type of caffeine consumption, as well as validated urinary symptom severity, bother and quality of life questionnaires, women were randomized to receive caffeine reduction education vs. a control group who reviewed their voiding diary with no counseling to reduce caffeine; both groups were asked to maintain total fluid intake. Participants repeated the 3-day bladder diary and validated questionnaires following randomization. A total of 80 women were required to achieve 80% power with an alpha error of 0.05 to detect a difference of 1.3 in mean number of daily voids averaged over a 3-day voiding diary.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Caffiene reduction group
Caffeine reduction group Intervention is to counseling to reduce caffeine intake
Caffeine reduction
patients are randomized to receive caffeine reduction counseling versus no caffeine reduction counseling
No caffeine reduction group
No Caffeine reduction group Intervention is to not counsel regarding caffeine intake
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Caffeine reduction
patients are randomized to receive caffeine reduction counseling versus no caffeine reduction counseling
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pfizer
INDUSTRY
University of New Mexico
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rebecca Rogers
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of New Mexico
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dr. Kammerer- Doak
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Tola Omotosho , MD
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
07-277
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.