Ibedrift- A Trial Comparing a New Approach to Musculoskeletal Pain Consisting of Education and Peer Involvement to Treatment as Usual
NCT ID: NCT00741650
Last Updated: 2015-02-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
2097 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-09-30
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Interdisciplinary Intervention Versus Brief Intervention for Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain
NCT01346423
Collaboratory Treatment Pathway for Chronic Pain Patients.
NCT07331766
Individually Tailored Web-based Multimodal Pain Rehabilitation in Primary Health Care
NCT01475591
Interactive Web-based Program and CBT-coaching With Physiotherapy for Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain
NCT02378519
Cognitive Functional Therapy Compared to Cognitive Patient Education and Physiotherapy for Patients With Low Back Pain
NCT03952741
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Ibedrift is a randomized controlled trial with the aim of studying the effect of a new treatment regime for musculoskeletal pain, focusing on didactic information about low back pain with peer support. Those participants not in the control group will have the option of contacting a peer advisor, a non health professional trained by the iBedrift crew to give information about back pain and reasons to stay active. For those who have not recovered within a short period of time, and who are randomized to full treatment, the peer advisor can send them directly to health personnel for a brief intervention consisting of a medical examination with screening for conditions that need treatment, counseling and education.
The intervention was done in 2 Norwegian municipalities for all local government employees. Randomization was done at the level of working units (schools, offices etc) which allows for more message containment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Information and peer advisor
Information and Peer advisor
Information at work place and recruitment and training of one employee as a peer advisor who help colleagues who experience musculoskeletal pain with reasons to stay active, help with adjustment in the work situation to allow individuals to stay at work.
2
Information, peer advisor and referral to further treatment
Information, peer advisor and fast referral
Information at work place and recruitment and training of one employee as a peer advisor who help colleagues who experience musculoskeletal pain with reasons to stay active, help with adjustment in the work situation to allow individuals to stay at work.
In addition, the peer advisor can refer employees who do not improve to a two day educational program that also includes a medical exam and individual counselling.
In addition,
3
Treatment as usual
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Information and Peer advisor
Information at work place and recruitment and training of one employee as a peer advisor who help colleagues who experience musculoskeletal pain with reasons to stay active, help with adjustment in the work situation to allow individuals to stay at work.
Information, peer advisor and fast referral
Information at work place and recruitment and training of one employee as a peer advisor who help colleagues who experience musculoskeletal pain with reasons to stay active, help with adjustment in the work situation to allow individuals to stay at work.
In addition, the peer advisor can refer employees who do not improve to a two day educational program that also includes a medical exam and individual counselling.
In addition,
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Known congenital musculoskeletal disease
* Cauda equina syndrome
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sykehuset i Vestfold HF
OTHER
Helse Sor-Ost
OTHER_GOV
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aage Indahl, Ph.d
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Hospital of Vestfold
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Spesialsykehuset for Rehabilitering
Stavern, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Odeen M, Ihlebaek C, Indahl A, Wormgoor ME, Lie SA, Eriksen HR. Effect of peer-based low back pain information and reassurance at the workplace on sick leave: a cluster randomized trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Jun;23(2):209-19. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9451-z.
Ree E, Odeen M, Eriksen HR, Indahl A, Ihlebaek C, Hetland J, Harris A. Subjective health complaints and self-rated health: are expectancies more important than socioeconomic status and workload? Int J Behav Med. 2014 Jun;21(3):411-20. doi: 10.1007/s12529-013-9329-7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18997
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
S-08054b
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
801622-611704
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.