Lid Margin And Conjunctival Microbial Flora Following Punctum Occlusion

NCT ID: NCT00735865

Last Updated: 2009-05-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

55 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-07-31

Study Completion Date

2009-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine if the types and amount of bacteria or other germs change over time after the routine procedure of blockage of tear drainage duct in the treatment of dry eye condition or other condition benefiting from a tear drainage blockage

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will investigate the impact of punctal occlusion on the ocular microbial flora. Current thought is that punctal occlusion causes retention of inflammatory mediators on the ocular surface which may produce pathology, we hypothesize that blockage of the nasolacrimal drainage system may allow colonization of the ocular surface by potentially pathogenic ubiquitous organisms (which may produce exotoxins and other biologic products) that may be responsible for signs and symptoms seen in some patients. Additionally, the presence of the silicone foreign body(punctal plug) may act as a nidus for bacterial adhesion with biofilm production (which is known to occur with Pseudomonas sp and other organisms). There would thus be a paradigm shift of our current understanding of the pathophysiology of punctal occlusion. Additionally, the choice of antimicrobials for the treatment of infections in patients with punctal occlusion may need to be modified if the microbial flora is found to be different in patients with punctal occlusion.

The ocular flora may be different inpatients with severe dry eye or other chronic pathologic conditions, which are frequent indications for punctal occlusion. However, from our retrospective review, we could not determine if there was a change in the microbial flora following plug placement with colonization with these "unusual organisms" since baseline cultures prior to punctal plug placement were not obtained.

We will try to differentiate any effect on the microbial flora caused by the silicone plug or acrylic plug(as a foreign body) versus the punctal closure by thermocautery. (Punctal thermocauterization is an alternative method of punctal closure which is 1) the preferred choice by some ophthalmologists for all their cases, or 2) when the dry eye is severe and irreversible punctal occlusion is desired or 3) if punctal plugs can not be retained due to the large size of the patients punctal). The thermodynamic hydrophobic acrylic plug(SmartPLUG) approved by the FDA for punctal occlusion with the same indications as the traditional silicone plug.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dry Eye Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Punctal plugs, punctal cautery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

25 subjects(20 silicone punctal plugs, 5 punctal cautery) The procedure will be based on clinical indication. Randomized one eye for study. Baseline cultures of lid margin \& tarsal/inferior fornix conjunctiva obtained \& plated according to protocol

2

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Punctal Plug, Punctal thermocauterization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Up to 5 subjects. Subjects in need of punctal occlusion(No preference for punctal thermocauterization or punctal occlusion by silicone plug). Randomize one eye to silicone punctal plug occlusion, the other eye to punctal thermocauterization.

This group ONLY, cultures will be obtained of the lid margin \& conjunctiva/inferior fornix of BOTH eyes

3

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Silicone plug or thermodynamic hydrophobic acrylic plug

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Up to 5 subjects. Subjects in need of punctal occlusion(not preference for punctal occlusion by silicone plug or by the thermodynamic hydrophobic acrylic plug). Randomize one eye to silicone punctal plug occlusion, the other eye to acrylic punctal plug occlusion.

In this group ONLY cultures will be obtained of the lid margin and conjunctiva/inferior fornix of BOTH eyes

4

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Previous subjects with Punctal occlusion

Intervention Type OTHER

Up to 20 subjects(15 subjects with silicone punctal plug closure and 5 subjects with punctal closure by thermocauterization)Subjects who have previously had punctal occlusion who have symptoms and/or signs thought to be secondary to punctal occlusion.

Lid margin and conjunctiva/inferior fornix of eye with greatest sign or symptoms will be cultured/plated according to standard protocol.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Punctal plugs, punctal cautery

25 subjects(20 silicone punctal plugs, 5 punctal cautery) The procedure will be based on clinical indication. Randomized one eye for study. Baseline cultures of lid margin \& tarsal/inferior fornix conjunctiva obtained \& plated according to protocol

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Punctal Plug, Punctal thermocauterization

Up to 5 subjects. Subjects in need of punctal occlusion(No preference for punctal thermocauterization or punctal occlusion by silicone plug). Randomize one eye to silicone punctal plug occlusion, the other eye to punctal thermocauterization.

This group ONLY, cultures will be obtained of the lid margin \& conjunctiva/inferior fornix of BOTH eyes

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Silicone plug or thermodynamic hydrophobic acrylic plug

Up to 5 subjects. Subjects in need of punctal occlusion(not preference for punctal occlusion by silicone plug or by the thermodynamic hydrophobic acrylic plug). Randomize one eye to silicone punctal plug occlusion, the other eye to acrylic punctal plug occlusion.

In this group ONLY cultures will be obtained of the lid margin and conjunctiva/inferior fornix of BOTH eyes

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Previous subjects with Punctal occlusion

Up to 20 subjects(15 subjects with silicone punctal plug closure and 5 subjects with punctal closure by thermocauterization)Subjects who have previously had punctal occlusion who have symptoms and/or signs thought to be secondary to punctal occlusion.

Lid margin and conjunctiva/inferior fornix of eye with greatest sign or symptoms will be cultured/plated according to standard protocol.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years and older
* Able to sign Informed Consent
* Clinical indication for punctal plug insertion or punctal cautery or symptomatic patients who have previously had punctal occlusion
* Clinical indication for punctal plug removal(Partial extrusion, discomfort) increased signs of ocular irritation with punctate keratopathy, punctal inflammation).
* Able to make follow up visit schedule

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects without dry eye
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lahey Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lahey Clinic, Inc.

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sarkis H. Soukiasian, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lahey Clinic, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lahey Clinic, Inc.

Burlington, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Lahey Clinic North

Peabody, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2003-049

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ocular Surface Microbiome
NCT02298881 COMPLETED
Probiotic in Dry Eye Syndromes
NCT04938908 COMPLETED PHASE2