Lid Margin And Conjunctival Microbial Flora Following Punctum Occlusion
NCT ID: NCT00735865
Last Updated: 2009-05-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
55 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-07-31
2009-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Open-Label, Multi-Center, Clinical Study Evaluating the Effect of the NDE L68 StableFit® Punctal Plug on the Tear Lake
NCT04280653
Study of the TearCare System in Dry Eye Disease
NCT03588624
Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Dry Eye in Contact Lens Wearers
NCT02102464
Safety and Efficacy of Punctal Plug Insertion in Patients With Dry Eye
NCT01684436
Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Prior to Cataract Surgery
NCT01808560
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The ocular flora may be different inpatients with severe dry eye or other chronic pathologic conditions, which are frequent indications for punctal occlusion. However, from our retrospective review, we could not determine if there was a change in the microbial flora following plug placement with colonization with these "unusual organisms" since baseline cultures prior to punctal plug placement were not obtained.
We will try to differentiate any effect on the microbial flora caused by the silicone plug or acrylic plug(as a foreign body) versus the punctal closure by thermocautery. (Punctal thermocauterization is an alternative method of punctal closure which is 1) the preferred choice by some ophthalmologists for all their cases, or 2) when the dry eye is severe and irreversible punctal occlusion is desired or 3) if punctal plugs can not be retained due to the large size of the patients punctal). The thermodynamic hydrophobic acrylic plug(SmartPLUG) approved by the FDA for punctal occlusion with the same indications as the traditional silicone plug.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Punctal plugs, punctal cautery
25 subjects(20 silicone punctal plugs, 5 punctal cautery) The procedure will be based on clinical indication. Randomized one eye for study. Baseline cultures of lid margin \& tarsal/inferior fornix conjunctiva obtained \& plated according to protocol
2
Punctal Plug, Punctal thermocauterization
Up to 5 subjects. Subjects in need of punctal occlusion(No preference for punctal thermocauterization or punctal occlusion by silicone plug). Randomize one eye to silicone punctal plug occlusion, the other eye to punctal thermocauterization.
This group ONLY, cultures will be obtained of the lid margin \& conjunctiva/inferior fornix of BOTH eyes
3
Silicone plug or thermodynamic hydrophobic acrylic plug
Up to 5 subjects. Subjects in need of punctal occlusion(not preference for punctal occlusion by silicone plug or by the thermodynamic hydrophobic acrylic plug). Randomize one eye to silicone punctal plug occlusion, the other eye to acrylic punctal plug occlusion.
In this group ONLY cultures will be obtained of the lid margin and conjunctiva/inferior fornix of BOTH eyes
4
Previous subjects with Punctal occlusion
Up to 20 subjects(15 subjects with silicone punctal plug closure and 5 subjects with punctal closure by thermocauterization)Subjects who have previously had punctal occlusion who have symptoms and/or signs thought to be secondary to punctal occlusion.
Lid margin and conjunctiva/inferior fornix of eye with greatest sign or symptoms will be cultured/plated according to standard protocol.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Punctal plugs, punctal cautery
25 subjects(20 silicone punctal plugs, 5 punctal cautery) The procedure will be based on clinical indication. Randomized one eye for study. Baseline cultures of lid margin \& tarsal/inferior fornix conjunctiva obtained \& plated according to protocol
Punctal Plug, Punctal thermocauterization
Up to 5 subjects. Subjects in need of punctal occlusion(No preference for punctal thermocauterization or punctal occlusion by silicone plug). Randomize one eye to silicone punctal plug occlusion, the other eye to punctal thermocauterization.
This group ONLY, cultures will be obtained of the lid margin \& conjunctiva/inferior fornix of BOTH eyes
Silicone plug or thermodynamic hydrophobic acrylic plug
Up to 5 subjects. Subjects in need of punctal occlusion(not preference for punctal occlusion by silicone plug or by the thermodynamic hydrophobic acrylic plug). Randomize one eye to silicone punctal plug occlusion, the other eye to acrylic punctal plug occlusion.
In this group ONLY cultures will be obtained of the lid margin and conjunctiva/inferior fornix of BOTH eyes
Previous subjects with Punctal occlusion
Up to 20 subjects(15 subjects with silicone punctal plug closure and 5 subjects with punctal closure by thermocauterization)Subjects who have previously had punctal occlusion who have symptoms and/or signs thought to be secondary to punctal occlusion.
Lid margin and conjunctiva/inferior fornix of eye with greatest sign or symptoms will be cultured/plated according to standard protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to sign Informed Consent
* Clinical indication for punctal plug insertion or punctal cautery or symptomatic patients who have previously had punctal occlusion
* Clinical indication for punctal plug removal(Partial extrusion, discomfort) increased signs of ocular irritation with punctate keratopathy, punctal inflammation).
* Able to make follow up visit schedule
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lahey Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lahey Clinic, Inc.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sarkis H. Soukiasian, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lahey Clinic, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lahey Clinic, Inc.
Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
Lahey Clinic North
Peabody, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2003-049
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.