Investigation to Identify Predictors of Response to a Treatment With Montelukast

NCT ID: NCT00721240

Last Updated: 2010-02-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-02-28

Study Completion Date

2009-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main aim of the study is to develop a method that allows responders to be distinguished from non-responders before long-term treatment is initiated. Subsidiary aims are to record changes in pulmonary functional parameters, NO concentrations and peak flow variability, the use of beta2 sympathomimetics and the asthma symptom score.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Leukotriene antagonists (montelukast) are particularly effective as controllers before exposure to an allergen (Leff 1998). The same applies to the treatment of bronchoconstriction induced by physical exertion or cold air (Richter 2000). Montelukast binds to the cysteinyl leuko¬triene-1 receptor, where it prevents leukotriene from binding. Leukotrienes play a key role as mediators in inflammatory processes. By binding to the receptor they cause, among other things, edema, damage to the bronchial epithelium and bronchoconstriction. Accordingly, in addition to its anti-inflammatory activity montelukast brings about bronchial dilation. The safety and efficacy of the drug in children have been well documented (Knorr 1998). Hence montelukast is approved for the treatment of bronchial asthma in children (over six months of age). As with other antiasthmatic drugs, there are responders and nonresponders to leukotriene receptor antagonists. The proportion of nonresponders to montelukast among children is esti¬mated to be 30% to 40%. At present the only way to distinguish non-responders from responders is to run a treatment trial for several weeks. If the symptom score falls, if the use of beta2 sympathomimetics is reduced, if pulmonary function and/or the quality of life improves, it is assumed that the patient is a responder. This method is not only tedious but also unsafe, since a change is the aforementioned parameters could occur spontaneously, without this being reliably attributable to the influence of the drug. In the planned study approximately 30 children with asthma of GINA classes 2 and 3 will be regularly examined for pulmonary function, symptom score and nitrogen monoxide (NO). First, however, the acute pharmacologic effect of a single dose of montelukast will be deter¬mined over a period of four hours by measuring pulmonary function and levels of exhaled nitrogen monoxide (NO).

4.2.1. Questions addressed:

Is it possible to discriminate between responders and nonresponders at a very early stage on the basis of the acute pharmacologic effect of montelukast? Does this classification agree with the results after 12 weeks of treatment?

4.2.2. Hypothesis:

Patients who show a bronchospasmolytic effect in their functional pulmonary test (FEV1 increased by at least 5%) within four hours of taking montelukast also show a positive response (defined as a combination of at least two variables (see section on the definition of responders/non-responders during treatment)) after 12 weeks of treatment. Conversely, patients who show no acute effect do not have a positive response during long-term therapy.

In other words, the results of the acute pharmacologic effect correspond to the effect during long-term therapy.

5\. Aim of the study:

The main aim of the study is to develop a method that allows responders to be distinguished from non-responders before long-term treatment is initiated. Subsidiary aims are to record changes in pulmonary functional parameters, NO concentrations and peak flow variability, the use of beta2 sympathomimetics and the asthma symptom score.

6\. Patient selection:

The study will include approximately 30 patients aged 6 to 14 years with diagnosed bronchial asthma who have been on constant anti-inflammatory therapy for at least four weeks (GINA classes 2 and 3).

7\. Study design:

This investigation is a single-center, two-phase, single-arm study. In order to detect a potential placebo effect, the treatment phase will be preceded by a single-blinded two-week placebo run-in phase, followed by a 12 week open-label treatment phase.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asthma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

single-arm

This investigation is a single-center, two-phase, single-arm study. In order to detect a potential placebo effect, the treatment phase will be preceded by a single-blinded two-week placebo run-in phase, followed by a 12 week open-label treatment phase.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

montelukast

Intervention Type DRUG

5mg montelukast once daily for 12 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

montelukast

5mg montelukast once daily for 12 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Singulair ; MK-476

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children and adolescents with symptomatic bronchial asthma despite ongoing therapy
* Age 6-14 years
* Asthma diagnosed at lease six months previously (by a special pulmonary allergologic outpatient unit)
* Demonstration of reversibility (FEV1 increased by at least 12% after bronchospasmolysis with a beta2 sympathomimetic). This can be determined at the screening visit or within the previous three months.
* Patients who are either steroid-naive or who received constant doses of the following medi¬cations within the previous four weeks:

* Beclomethasone dipropionate: up to 400 µg daily
* Fluticasone propionate: up to 200 µg daily
* Budesonide: up to 400 µg daily
* Patients who are able to reliably complete the asthma diary and perform peak flow measurements according to instructions.
* Girls of childbearing potential must have acceptable methods of contraceptions, including sexual abstinence.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who were treated with systemic steroids within the previous 30 days
* Patients using one of the following asthma medications:

* Systemic steroids
* Nedocromil, DNCG
* Theophylline
* Ketotifen
* Systemic or long-acting beta2 sympathomimetics
* Patients who have experienced one of the following events within the previous 30 days:

* A change in asthma medication
* Pulmonary infection
* Hospitalization due to bronchial asthma or any other respiratory condition
* Patients who are currently participating in another clinical trial or have done so within the previous 30 days.
* Patients known or expected to react hypersensitively to components of the investigational medication
* Patients receiving Phenobarbital, Phenytoin, Rifampicin (medications that are metabolized by Cytochrom P450
* Patients with analgetic intolerance
* Pregnant females
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Marien Hospital Wesel

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marien Hospital Wesel, Forschungsinstitut zur Prävention von Allergien und Atemwegserkrankungen im Kindesalter an der Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

ANDREA VON BERG, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Marien Hospital Wesel; FORSCHUNGSINSTITUT ZUR PRÄVENTION VON ALLERGIEN UND ATEMWEGSERKRANKUNGEN IM KINDESALTER AN DER kLINIK FÜR KINDER UND JUGENDMEDIZIN

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Marien Hospital Wesel gGmbH

Wesel, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Trial No. 25.08.2005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study in Mild Asthmatic Patients
NCT00748306 COMPLETED PHASE2