Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-07-31
2011-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study Population: Eligibility criteria include central macular thickening \> 260 microns and visual acuity 20/32 or worse in one or both eyes.
Design: Five participants will be enrolled into this open-label pilot study. After receiving a 20 μL (440 μg) subconjunctival injection in the study eye at baseline and Month 2, the participants will be re-evaluated every two months for at least one year for possible additional injections. During follow-up, participants will not undergo re-injection if they show significant clinical improvement or treatment success, defined as no intraretinal fluid or cysts present on optical coherence tomography (OCT) OR 100% reduction in excess retinal thickness over 260 microns on OCT OR no leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA). Beginning at Month 4, participants will be assessed for treatment failure, defined as loss of 15 or more letters of vision compared to baseline at two consecutive visits OR a 50% or greater increase in total retinal thickness as measured by OCT at two consecutive visits. Individual participants deemed treatment failures will continue receiving sirolimus injections, but will be allowed to receive focal laser therapy for any amenable leaking microaneurysms at Month 4. Beginning at Month 6, focal laser therapy will be permitted for both treatment failures and participants who do not meet the criteria of a treatment success. Participants will have the option of continuing treatment until a common termination date of one year.
Outcome Measures: The primary outcome is the change in visual acuity in the study eye at six months compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes include changes in visual acuity in the study eye at one year as compared with baseline, changes in retinal thickness as measured by OCT and changes in fluid leakage in the macula as demonstrated by FA at six months, one year and throughout the study period in the study and fellow eyes. Safety outcomes include number and severity of systemic and ocular toxicities, adverse events and infections, and the number of participants withdrawn from study therapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pilot Study of Laser Photocoagulation Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema
NCT00069056
Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) With Anti-VEGF and Focal Laser
NCT03590444
Intravitreal Faricimab in Diabetic Macular Edema With Limited Response to Aflibercept
NCT05610488
A Pilot Study for the Evaluation of Minocycline as a Microglia Inhibitor in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema
NCT01120899
A Phase 2a Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of SNP318 in DME Patients
NCT07199777
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sirolimus
The study eye was treated with sirolimus.
Sirolimus
20 μL (440 μg) of sirolimus were injected at baseline, Month 2, and every 2 months thereafter if re-treatment criteria were satisfied.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sirolimus
20 μL (440 μg) of sirolimus were injected at baseline, Month 2, and every 2 months thereafter if re-treatment criteria were satisfied.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of diabetic mellitus (type 1 or type 2).
Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:
1. Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes.
2. Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes.
3. Documented diabetes by American Diabetes Association (ADA) and/or World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.
3. Documented hemoglobin A1C 12% or less within one month of baseline.
4. Able and willing to provide informed consent.
5. Both female participants of childbearing potential and male participants able to father a child must agree to practice two\* forms of adequate birth control throughout the course of the study and for three months following the completion of the study treatment. Acceptable methods of birth control include hormonal contraception (birth control pills, injected hormones or vaginal ring), intrauterine device, barrier methods with spermicide (diaphragm with spermicide, condom and spermicide) or surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, tubal ligation or vasectomy).
\*Participants with a hysterectomy or vasectomy (or who have a partner with a hysterectomy or vasectomy) are exempt from using two methods of contraception. However, female participants with a tubal ligation (or male participants who have a female partner with a tubal ligation) are not exempt, and are required to practice another acceptable method of birth control.
6. Female participants of childbearing potential must be willing to undergo pregnancy testing for the duration of the study.
7. At least one eye meets the study eye criteria listed in Section 4.2.
1. Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity score of ≤ 74 letters (i.e., 20/32 or worse).
2. Definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema based on clinical exam involving the center of the macula that is not refractory to further therapy as based on the investigator's clinical judgment.
3. Retinal thickness on baseline OCT measurement \> 260 microns in the central subfield.
4. Media clarity, pupillary dilation and patient cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Positive serum or urine pregnancy test or currently lactating for women of childbearing potential.
3. A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure and glycemic control).
4. Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of study entry that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval at the time of study entry.
5. History of cancer (other than a non-melanoma skin cancer) diagnosed within the past five years that could be worsened by immunosuppression.\*
\*The risk of immunosuppression must be determined by an oncology consultation prior to enrollment.
6. Laboratory values outside normal limits and considered clinically significant by the investigator.
7. Blood pressure \> 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110).
8. History of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy or subtenon/intravitreal steroids in either eye within three months prior to study entry.
9. History of treatment with systemic anti-VEGF agents or steroids within one year prior to study entry.
10. Participant is currently taking one of the following drugs: amprenavir, atazanavir, clarithromycin, darunavir, delavirdine, erythromycin, fluconazole (at doses of 200mg or greater), fluvoxamine, indinavir, itraconazole, ketoconazole, nefazodone, nelfinavir, posaconazole, quinupristin, ritonavir, saquinavir, telithromycin, troleandomycin, verapamil or voriconazole.
1. Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema.
2. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigmentary changes, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition, etc.).
3. An ocular condition is present (other than diabetic retinopathy) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, Irvine-Gass Syndrome, etc.).
4. Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by three lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal).
5. History of focal/grid macular photocoagulation within 12 weeks (three months) prior to study entry.
6. History of panretinal scatter photocoagulation (PRP) within four months prior to study entry.
7. Anticipated need for PRP in the four months following study entry.
8. History of prior pars plana vitrectomy.
9. History of major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior six months or anticipated within the next six months following study entry.
10. History of (Yttrium Aluminium Garnet) YAG laser capsulotomy performed within two months prior to study entry.
11. Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Catherine Meyerle, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Eye Institute/ National Institutes of Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kempen JH, O'Colmain BJ, Leske MC, Haffner SM, Klein R, Moss SE, Taylor HR, Hamman RF; Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):552-63. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.552.
Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. IV. Diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1984 Dec;91(12):1464-74. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(84)34102-1.
Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Dec;103(12):1796-806.
Krishnadev N, Forooghian F, Cukras C, Wong W, Saligan L, Chew EY, Nussenblatt R, Ferris F 3rd, Meyerle C. Subconjunctival sirolimus in the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Nov;249(11):1627-33. doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1694-9. Epub 2011 May 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
08-EI-0175
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
080175
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.