Evaluation of the Cobas® 4800 HPV Test for the Detection of High-grade Cervical Disease

NCT ID: NCT00709891

Last Updated: 2015-02-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

47208 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-05-31

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study provided data on the performance of the Cobas® 4800 HPV Test for identifying histologically confirmed high-grade cervical disease. The baseline, cross-sectional phase was conducted in approximately 45,000 women undergoing routine cervical cancer screening, of whom approximately 7,400 were selected to undergo colposcopy and biopsy/endocervical curettage (ECC) at baseline. These subjects included women with cytology that is 'not normal' and a selection of those with 'normal' cytology who entered a follow-up phase and underwent cytological evaluation annually for 3 years. In this follow-up phase, colposcopy and biopsy/ECC were performed only in women with cervical cytology considered 'not normal' at any of the annual follow-up visits.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

cobas® 4800 HPV Test

The cobas 4800 human papillomavirus (HPV) Test combines in a single assay the identification of pooled high-risk oncogenic HPV types (31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68), as well as genotypes 16 and 18 individually.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cobas® 4800 HPV Test

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cobas® 4800 HPV Test

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Females ≥ 21 years of age presenting for routine cervical cancer screening.
* An intact cervix.
* Willing and able to undergo colposcopy and biopsy and endocervical curettage within 8 weeks after study Visit 1.

Exclusion Criteria

* Known pregnancy at study Visit 1.
* Presenting for colposcopy at study Visit 1.
* Any condition resulting in increased risk of bleeding at biopsy.
* Hysterectomy.
* Known history of ablative or excisional therapy to the cervix within the preceding 12 months.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Catherine Behrens

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Roche Molecular Systems, Inc

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Enterprise, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Hoover, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Costa Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Lakewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lake Worth, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

North Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Champaign, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Newburgh, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Covington, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Ruston, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Lawrenceville, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Moorestown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

New Bern, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Englewood, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Hilton Head, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

North Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

McAllen, Texas, United States

Site Status

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Monsonego J, Cox JT, Behrens C, Sandri M, Franco EL, Yap PS, Huh W. Prevalence of high-risk human papilloma virus genotypes and associated risk of cervical precancerous lesions in a large U.S. screening population: data from the ATHENA trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Apr;137(1):47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.551. Epub 2015 Feb 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25667973 (View on PubMed)

Wright TC Jr, Stoler MH, Behrens CM, Sharma A, Sharma K, Apple R. Interlaboratory variation in the performance of liquid-based cytology: insights from the ATHENA trial. Int J Cancer. 2014 Apr 15;134(8):1835-43. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28514. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24122508 (View on PubMed)

Castle PE, Stoler MH, Wright TC Jr, Sharma A, Wright TL, Behrens CM. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):880-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70188-7. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21865084 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MWP-HPV-159

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RD000649

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.