Impact of Group Motivational Interviewing and In-Home-Messaging-Devices for Dually Diagnosed Veterans
NCT ID: NCT00706901
Last Updated: 2018-08-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
180 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-05-03
2013-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Group Motivational Interviewing (GMI) For Homeless Veterans In VA Services
NCT02233738
Preventing Violence Among Veterans in Substance Use Disorder Treatment
NCT01337973
Health Focused Motivational Treatment for Alcohol Dependent Veterans
NCT00252590
Adjunctive Motivational Alcohol Intervention to Prevent IPV
NCT05287711
Designing a Mobile App for Veterans With Substance Use Problems
NCT01812187
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary questions:
A. Does GMI lead to a significantly greater reduction in alcohol use and an increase in treatment engagement outcomes in the 3-month follow-up period compared to participants assigned to TCC?
Hypothesis: Participants who receive GMI will consume less alcohol and will be engaged in and attend more continuous treatment than participants in TCC in the 3-month follow-up period.
B. Does IHMD lead to a significantly greater reduction in alcohol use and an increase in treatment engagement outcomes in the 3-month follow-up period compared to participants assigned to TCC?
Hypothesis: Participants who receive IHMD will consume less alcohol and will be engaged in and attend more continuous treatment than participants in TCC in the 3-month follow-up period.
Exploratory question:
Compared to TCC, will GMI and IHMD lead to significantly fewer days of illicit drug use by 3-month follow-up?
Hypothesis: Compared to TCC, GMI and IHMD will result in a significant reduction in days of illicit drug use by 3-month follow-up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1 GMI
Patients randomized to GMI received four structured 75-minute sessions consistent with the central principles and style of motivational interviewing (Miller \& Rollnick, 2012). The goal of MI is to develop a sense of discrepancy between personal goals and current behavior and enhance change talk among participants, particularly for taking responsibility of one's substance use and being proactive for remaining in treatment.
Arm 1 GMI
Participants randomized to GMI received four structured, back-to-back, 75-minute sessions in one week consistent with the central principles and spirit of MI (Miller \& Rollnick 2013) and based on a manualized protocol (Martino \& Santa Ana 2013; Santa Ana \& Martino, 2009). Designed for dually diagnosed patients, a focus of the intervention is to examine the relationship between the substance use and the co-existing psychiatric disorder(s) and the importance of proactively treating both conditions.
Arm 3 TCC
TCC consisted of a 4-session psychoeducational group (75 minutes per session). Material was delivered using a power point presentation on topics
Arm 2 IHMD
Participants randomized to In-Home-Messaging Devices (IHMD) received a 27-day Care Coordination Home Telehealth (CCHT) program targeting their acute recovery from alcohol and other substance use disorder. Participants received their IHMD device through the Charleston VAMC CCHT program, including device accessories and a phone number to reach their CCHT provider. They were provided with specific instructions on how to set up their IHMD in their residence after discharge. The research associate followed-up with the patient one day after receiving the device to ensure that the device was successfully set up and to provide assistance as necessary. Participants received standard VA CCHT services.
Arm 2 IHMD
Participants randomized to IHMD received a 27 day VA Care Coordination Home Telehealth (CCHT) program targeting acute recovery from alcohol and other drug disorders. IHMD consisted of daily assessment combined with dialogues consisting of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral therapy, and 12-step (mutual self-help) facilitation.
Arm 3 TCC
TCC consisted of a 4-session psychoeducational group (75 minutes per session). Material was delivered using a power point presentation on topics
Arm 3 TCC
Participants randomized to the Treatment Control Condition (TCC) received a psycho-educational group (e.g., addiction as a chronic disease, relapse prevention, developing a plan to prevent relapse) that was delivered with the aid of sequential standardized PowerPoint presentations. Group members were encouraged to ask questions and make comments. Therapists were encouraged to conduct the sessions using an instructional quality that minimized the use of GMI strategies. TCC consisted of four sessions, lasting 75 minutes, and was conducted on four consecutive days within the course of one week.
Arm 3 TCC
TCC consisted of a 4-session psychoeducational group (75 minutes per session). Material was delivered using a power point presentation on topics
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Arm 1 GMI
Participants randomized to GMI received four structured, back-to-back, 75-minute sessions in one week consistent with the central principles and spirit of MI (Miller \& Rollnick 2013) and based on a manualized protocol (Martino \& Santa Ana 2013; Santa Ana \& Martino, 2009). Designed for dually diagnosed patients, a focus of the intervention is to examine the relationship between the substance use and the co-existing psychiatric disorder(s) and the importance of proactively treating both conditions.
Arm 2 IHMD
Participants randomized to IHMD received a 27 day VA Care Coordination Home Telehealth (CCHT) program targeting acute recovery from alcohol and other drug disorders. IHMD consisted of daily assessment combined with dialogues consisting of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral therapy, and 12-step (mutual self-help) facilitation.
Arm 3 TCC
TCC consisted of a 4-session psychoeducational group (75 minutes per session). Material was delivered using a power point presentation on topics
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* reading level at least at the 5th grade level
* ability to identify at least one collateral contact
* ability to be contacted by telephone at follow-up
* access to a working telephone line in the home or residential placement
* alcohol use or alcohol and drug use in the 28 days prior to hospitalization and current alcohol dependence (or abuse) or alcohol and drug abuse
Exclusion Criteria
* scheduled for discharge within 72 hours of initial screening
* diagnosis of dementia
* inability to speak or understand English
* unable to access a landline telephone for the IHMD treatment group
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elizabeth J. Santa Ana, PhD MA BA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Price KL, Baker NL, McRae-Clark AL, Saladin ME, Desantis SM, Santa Ana EJ, Brady KT. A randomized, placebo-controlled laboratory study of the effects of D-cycloserine on craving in cocaine-dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Apr;226(4):739-46. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2592-x. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
Prisciandaro JJ, Myrick H, Henderson S, McRae-Clark AL, Santa Ana EJ, Saladin ME, Brady KT. Impact of DCS-facilitated cue exposure therapy on brain activation to cocaine cues in cocaine dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Sep 1;132(1-2):195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
Santa Ana EJ, Stallings DL, Rounsaville BJ, Martino S. Development of an in-home telehealth program for outpatient veterans with substance use disorders. Psychol Serv. 2013 Aug;10(3):304-314. doi: 10.1037/a0026511. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IIR 13-317-2
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDA-2-016-08S
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.