Effectiveness of Mechanical Decompression for Low Back Pain Relief
NCT ID: NCT00704210
Last Updated: 2016-10-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-08-31
2009-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of Activities of Daily Living in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain Using a Nonoperative Treatment Modality
NCT02729181
Efficacy of Mechanical Traction and Spinal Decompression Treatments in Patients With Low Back Pain
NCT05617924
Effects of Decompression in Patient With Acute vs Chronic Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT04674917
Comparative Effect of Diaphragmatic Training in Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain
NCT07167212
Clinical Study on the Use of Massage to Reconstruct the Function of Lumbar Stabilizer Muscles and Improve the "Muscle and Bone Imbalance" of Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT06946979
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study will assess whether a computer-assisted traction treatment \[decompression\] protocol results in improvement in patient pain levels and daily activity levels. Further, to determine if such treatment results in intervertebral widening and reduction of any disc protrusions as demonstrated by direct imaging of the lumbar spine. A double-blind (treatment vs. sham treatment) design will be employed
Specific Aims To study the effectiveness of decompression therapy for LBP patients with lumbar disc herniation and degenerative disc problems.
To demonstrate that decompression therapy for LBP patients results in a demonstrated reduction in levels of reported pain.
To demonstrate that decompression therapy for LBP patients results in a demonstrated greater return to daily activities.
To demonstrate that decompression therapy for LBP patients results in increased intervertebral space and reduced disk protrusion (if present) as measured by MRI.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
B
Group B will receive sham decompression treatment (i.e. tension not exceeding 15 lbs) for 30 minutes and ice treatment for 15 minutes once a day during each treatment session. No incremental increases will be used for Group B.
SpineMed Table, Cert HealthSciences LLC
Group B will receive sham decompression treatment (i.e. tension not exceeding 15 lbs) for 30 minutes and ice treatment for 15 minutes once a day during each treatment session. No incremental increases will be used for Group B.
A
For Group A (the treated group) the following tension adjustments will be used: starting treatment tension will equal 1/4 body weight minus 10 lbs. Incremental increases of 4 lbs. per session will be implemented until optimum tensions are reached, which would be a maximum of ¼ body weight plus 25 lbs, unless distraction tensions cause discomfort, which would require a reduction of the tensions applied.
SpineMed Table, Cert HealthSciences LLC
For Group A (the treated group) the following tension adjustments will be used: starting treatment tension will equal 1/4 body weight minus 10 lbs. Incremental increases of 4 lbs. per session will be implemented until optimum tensions are reached, which would be a maximum of ¼ body weight plus 25 lbs, unless distraction tensions cause discomfort, which would require a reduction of the tensions applied.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SpineMed Table, Cert HealthSciences LLC
For Group A (the treated group) the following tension adjustments will be used: starting treatment tension will equal 1/4 body weight minus 10 lbs. Incremental increases of 4 lbs. per session will be implemented until optimum tensions are reached, which would be a maximum of ¼ body weight plus 25 lbs, unless distraction tensions cause discomfort, which would require a reduction of the tensions applied.
SpineMed Table, Cert HealthSciences LLC
Group B will receive sham decompression treatment (i.e. tension not exceeding 15 lbs) for 30 minutes and ice treatment for 15 minutes once a day during each treatment session. No incremental increases will be used for Group B.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Applicants may have pain radiating to their legs.
Exclusion Criteria
* Recent Fractures, less than 8 weeks of any bone
* Tumors of any type including soft tissue tumors, myeloma, malignant or documented tumors of any type
* Gross osteoporosis,
* Spondylolisthesis grade 2 and above,
* Hardware fixation, spine fixation or other boney fusion
* Obesity as defined by a BMI greater than 35, body weight over 287 pounds,
* Contra-indication for MRJ assessment,
* Pregnancy,
* neurologic deficits,
* bowel or bladder incontinence,
* progressive lower extremity weakness,
* need for narcotic pain medications for other conditions.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
William Grant
Professor, Family Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
William D Grant, EdD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRBPHS 5379
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.