A Reminder System for Paper-Based Asthma Guidelines in the Pediatric Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT00699439

Last Updated: 2018-08-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-07-31

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary idea is that the use of a computerized reminder system to help with the guideline implementation will increase utilization and adherence of guideline-driven care, leading to improved patient outcomes. The hypothesis we aim to address is that an automatic, computerized reminder system for detecting asthma patients in the pediatric ED will increase paper-based guideline utilization compared to paper-based guideline without the system.

We aim to implement a real-time, computerized asthma detection system and integrate the system with the pediatric emergency department information system, and evaluate the effect of the asthma detection system on reminding clinicians to use the paper-based asthma guideline.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Asthma is the leading chronic childhood disease affecting 9 million children (12.5%) under 18 years of age (1). Asthma exacerbations cause an estimated 14 million missed school days (2) and more than 1.8 million emergency department (ED) visits annually (2), and account for \>60% of asthma-related costs (3). The chronic characteristic of asthma carries a considerable economic burden.

Uncontrolled asthma can lead to exacerbations requiring the patient to seek immediate care, frequently in an ED setting. Several asthma guidelines, including the nationally accepted guideline from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), exist to support clinicians in providing adequate treatment. Utilization of and adherence with asthma guidelines improves patients' clinical care (4, 5). However, guideline adherence remains suboptimal. In the ED, early recognition and accurate assessment of the severity of airway obstruction and response to therapy are fundamental to the improvement of health for patients with asthma. The NHLBI guidelines emphasize early recognition and treatment of asthma exacerbations, as well as appropriate treatment stratified by severity.

Computer applications for patient care can address barriers to optimal medical care. Computer systems have improved the use and adherence to practice guidelines, provide clinical alerts and reminders, and generate patient-specific treatment recommendations and educational material. Implementation of guideline-driven decision support is frequently paper-based or computerized. In either form a major barrier remains on the busy clinicians to remember to initiate the guideline a process and to embed the guideline tasks in the clinical workflow of the care team (5). The proposed study examines the benefits of a novel approach for reminding clinicians in an ED setting to use guideline-driven care. The approach will apply a workflow-embedded process taking advantage of an advanced information technology infrastructure. The informatics approach will include two elements: a) a computerized, real-time reminder system, which will automatically detect guideline-eligible patients without requiring additional data entry, and b) a computerized, workflow-embedded guideline implementation.

References

1. Ref: QuickStats: Percentage of Children Aged \<18 years Who Have Ever Had Asthma Diagnosed, by Age Group --- United States, 2003; MMWR April 29, 2005 / 54(16);412. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5416a5.htm
2. Allergy \& Asthma Advocate. Quarterly patient newsletter of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and immunology. 2004.
3. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Walker AE, Thomas RE. Changing physicians' behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002;22:237-243.
4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. 1997.
5. Scribano PV, Lerer T, Kennedy D, Cloutier MM. Provider adherence to a clinical practice guideline for acute asthma in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:1147-1152.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asthma Medical Informatics

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

If a patient is identified as having an asthma exacerbation by the Bayesian Network, the paper-based flow-chart will be printed out to place on the chart.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Paper-based asthma flow diagram

Intervention Type OTHER

If a patient is identified as having an asthma exacerbation by the Bayesian Network, the patients will be randomized to either arm A or B. If in A, the paper-based flow-chart will be printed out to place on the chart.

B

If a patient is identified as having an asthma exacerbation by the Bayesian Network, and assigned to the control group, no flow-chart will be printed out.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Paper-based asthma flow diagram

If a patient is identified as having an asthma exacerbation by the Bayesian Network, the patients will be randomized to either arm A or B. If in A, the paper-based flow-chart will be printed out to place on the chart.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients aged 2-18 years;
* Emergency Severity Index 2 to 5; AND
* Availability of completed computerized triage documentation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Critically ill patients (Emergency Severity Index 1)
* Patients who leave-without-being seen
* Patients who leave against-medical-advice
* Patients whose final diagnosis was not asthma (false positive identification by the detection system) or were determined not to be eligible for the guideline.
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Judith W Dexheimer, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vanderbilt University

Dominik Aronsky, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vanderbilt University

Donald H Arnold, MD, MPH

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Vanderbilt University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vanderbilt University

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dexheimer JW, Brown LE, Leegon J, Aronsky D. Comparing decision support methodologies for identifying asthma exacerbations. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 2):880-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17911842 (View on PubMed)

Sanders DL, Aronsky D. Prospective evaluation of a Bayesian Network for detecting asthma exacerbations in a Pediatric Emergency Department. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:1085.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17238704 (View on PubMed)

Sanders DL, Aronsky D. Detecting asthma exacerbations in a pediatric emergency department using a Bayesian network. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:684-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17238428 (View on PubMed)

Sanders DL, Gregg W, Aronsky D. Identifying asthma exacerbations in a pediatric emergency department: a feasibility study. Int J Med Inform. 2007 Jul;76(7):557-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 May 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16647876 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

070206

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The RECORD-ED Pilot Study
NCT04676490 COMPLETED NA