Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
95 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-05-31
2010-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of FS VH S/D 500 S-apr (Tisseel) as an Adjunct to Sutured Dural Repair in Cranial Surgery
NCT02891070
Fibrin Sealant VH S/D 500 S-apr in Hepatic Resection
NCT01244425
Efficacy and Safety Study of Fibrin Sealant With 4 IU/mL Thrombin, Vapor Heated, Solvent Detergent Treated (FS VH S/D 4) in Face-Lift Procedures
NCT00708071
Safety and Efficacy Study of Fibrin Sealant Grifols as an Adjunct to Hemostasis During Peripheral Vascular Surgery
NCT01662856
Efficacy and Safety of FS VH S/D 4 S-apr for Flap Adherence in Rhytidectomy
NCT00999141
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FS VH S/D 500 s-apr
Application of FS VH S/D 500 s-apr on top of suture
Fibrin Sealant, Vapor Heated, Solvent/Detergent-treated with 500 IU/mL thrombin and synthetic aprotinin (FS VH S/D 500 s-apr)
Application of a thin layer of FS VH S/D 500 s-apr to the entire length of the suture loop and the adjacent area to at least 5 mm away from the suture line, including all suture holes. After application, the product is to be allowed to polymerize for 3 minutes.
Standard of Care (Control group)
The treatment of the control group consisted of Standard of Care (SoC) which was defined as the closure of a dura defect by suturing in a patch of autologous fascia, pericranium or suturable collagen based dura substitute.
Standard of care
Standard care: defined as the closure of a dura defect by suturing in a patch of autologous fascia, pericranium or suturable collagen-based dura substitute.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fibrin Sealant, Vapor Heated, Solvent/Detergent-treated with 500 IU/mL thrombin and synthetic aprotinin (FS VH S/D 500 s-apr)
Application of a thin layer of FS VH S/D 500 s-apr to the entire length of the suture loop and the adjacent area to at least 5 mm away from the suture line, including all suture holes. After application, the product is to be allowed to polymerize for 3 minutes.
Standard of care
Standard care: defined as the closure of a dura defect by suturing in a patch of autologous fascia, pericranium or suturable collagen-based dura substitute.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Signed and dated written informed consent from the subject or from his/her legal representative prior to any study-related procedures
* Age \>= 3 years, either gender
* Surgical Wound Classification Class I and Risk Index Category (RIC) \<= 2. Penetration of mastoid air cells during partial mastoidectomy is permitted and will be recorded.
* A patch of autologous fascia or pericranium or suturable collagen-based dura substitute was cut to size and then sutured into the dura defect.
* The hem of native dura exposed along and under the craniotomy edge is wide enough to facilitate suturing and to allow for sufficient surface area for adherence of the investigational product.
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects with a dura lesion from a recent surgery that still has the potential for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage unless it can be expected that the lesion will be excised completely, including all old suture holes
* Chemotherapy scheduled within 7 days following surgery
* Radiation therapy to the head scheduled within 7 days following surgery
* Subjects with severely altered renal (serum creatinine \> 2 mg/dL) and/or hepatic function \[ALT, AST \> 5 x upper limit of norm (ULN)\]
* Evidence of an infection indicated by any one of the following: fever \> 101°F, white blood cell (WBC) count \< 3500/μL or \> 13000/μL, positive blood culture, positive chest X-ray. A positive urine culture (\> 10\^5 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL) leads to exclusion unless acute cystitis is the sole cause. Evidence of infection along the planned surgical path. A WBC count of \< 20000/μL is permitted if the patient is being treated with steroids in the absence of all the other infection parameters.
* Conditions compromising the immune system; existence of autoimmune disease
* Known hypersensitivity to aprotinin or other components of the investigational product
* Non-compliant or insufficient treatment of diabetes mellitus \[glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) \> 7.5%\]
* Hydrocephalus, except occlusive hydrocephalus caused by posterior fossa pathology to be treated
* Existing CSF (ventricular, etc.) drains. Burr holes are permitted as long as the dura remains intact. Cushing cannulation excludes the subject.
* Female subjects of childbearing potential with a positive urine or serum pregnancy test within 24 hours prior to surgery
* Participation in another clinical trial with exposure to another investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to enrollment
* Scheduled or foreseeable surgery within the follow-up period
* Dura injury during craniotomy / craniectomy that cannot be eliminated by recreating a sufficiently wide native dura hem
* Failure to administer preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis
* Use of implants made of synthetic materials coming into direct contact with dura (e.g., polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patches, shunts, ventricular and subdural drains)
* Placement of Gliadel wafers
* Chiari 1 subjects without injury to the arachnoid
* Persistent signs of increased brain turgor
* Use of product(s) other than FS VH S/D 500 s-apr for the sealing of dura sutures, including packing with Gelfoam
* Brain surface visible between suture loops as a manifestation of increased suture tension
* CSF leakage from completed dura sutures presenting as dripping drops, growing beads or running trickles. Slight oozing is consistent with successful dura repair and will not lead to exclusion.
* Intersecting durotomy scars in the surgical path from a previous operation that cannot be completely removed by the planned dura resection
* Dura lesion from a recent surgery that cannot be completely excised, including all old suture holes
* Two or more separate dura defects
* Major intraoperative complications that require resuscitation or deviation from the planned surgical procedure
3 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guenter Zuelow, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duarte, California, United States
Sacramento, California, United States
San Diego, California, United States
Orlando, Florida, United States
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Johnson City, New York, United States
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
550701
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.