A Migration and Bone Density Study Comparing 2 Types of Bone Cement in the OptiPac Bone Cement Mixing System
NCT ID: NCT00678236
Last Updated: 2013-08-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-06-30
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In prosthesis used in this study includes a tibial plateau with a central stem with stabilizing wings, the bottom surface of which is recessed by about 1 mm, so that a pocket is formed surrounded by a lip that provides for an even thickness of the cement layer beneath the tibial plateau. This assures that the cement is pressed down into the spongiosa during fixation of the implant. This design doubles the penetration of the cement compared with prostheses without a depressed baseplate. The company behind this design has had a successful follow-up of this system for more than 15 years. A good cement/implant interphase lessens the risk of penetration of debris into the interphase and thus reduces the risk for the development of osteolysis and aseptic loosening of the implant.
Fixation of knee alloplasties is done in 70% of cases with use of cement. It is uncertain whether there is a difference in the long-term survival of knee prostheses with the two types of cement used in this project. Both types of cement in this study are used today in knee surgery with good, short-term clinical results. It is important to investigate new types of cement in order to assure future patients the best possible results after knee alloplasty and fewer re-operations.
The goal of this scientific study is to determine whether there are differences in early migration and prosthesis-near bone density when a standard knee prosthesis is fixed with Refobacin Bone Cement R or with Refobacin Plus Bone Cement. Migration will be evaluated with RSA and bone density around the prosthesis with DEXA. The study will be successful if the prosthesis is fixed and remains in place throughout the entire period of the study, that is, that there is no increasing migration as measured by RSA. The cement type that ensures the largest number of solidly fixed prostheses during the two-year evaluation period will be "the best".
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Refobacin Bone Cement R
Refobacin Bone Cement R
Insertion of a knee prosthesis fixed by Refobacin Bone Cement R
2
Refobacin Plus Bone Cement
Refobacin Plus Bone Cement
Insertion of a knee prosthesis fixed by Refobacin Plus Bone Cement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Refobacin Bone Cement R
Insertion of a knee prosthesis fixed by Refobacin Bone Cement R
Refobacin Plus Bone Cement
Insertion of a knee prosthesis fixed by Refobacin Plus Bone Cement
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* sufficient bone quality for total knee arthroplasty
* age above 70 years
* no upper age limit if the patient is capable
* informed and written consent
* patient can only enter the project with one knee
Exclusion Criteria
* preoperatively not found suitable for a knee arthroplasty
* patients with osteoporosis based on former diagnosis or preoperative DEXA-scan
* fracture sequelae or previous PTO or previous extensive knee surgery
* patients with need of a stem-elongation
* patients who cannot refrain from taking NSAID post-operatively
* continuous medical treatment with vitamin K antagonists (Warfarin) which is known to reduce the bon emineral density by a factor of 5
* patients with metabolic bone disease
* patients with rheumatoid arthritis
* postmenopausal women in estrogenic hormone substitution
* patients with a continuous need of systemic cortisone treatment
* non-Danish citizenship
* patients who do not comprehend the Danish language (read and speak)
* senile dementia
* alcoholism - defined as men drinking more than 21 units a week and women drinking more than 14 units a week
* drug abuse
* major psychiatric disease
* metastatic cancer disease and treatment with radiation therapy or chemotherapy
* severe systemic disease (e.g. hemi paresis and Parkinson disease)
* systemic hip and spine disease
* employee at the orthopaedic department, Aarhus University Hospital
* ongoing case regarding industrial injury insurance of the knee
* patients with poor dental status (risk of infection)
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aarhus University Hospital
OTHER
Zimmer Biomet
INDUSTRY
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kjeld Soballe, MD, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Tage-Hansens Gade 2, 8000 Ã…rhus C, Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20070237
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id