A Migration and Bone Density Study Comparing 2 Types of Bone Cement in the OptiPac Bone Cement Mixing System

NCT ID: NCT00678236

Last Updated: 2013-08-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-06-30

Study Completion Date

2012-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this scientific study is to determine whether there are differences in early migration and prosthesis-near bone density when a standard knee prosthesis is fixed with Refobacin Bone Cement R or with Refobacin Plus Bone Cement. Migration will be evaluated with RSA and bone density around the prosthesis with DEXA. The study will be successful if the prosthesis is fixed and remains in place throughout the entire period of the study, that is, that there is no increasing migration as measured by RSA. The cement type that ensures the largest number of solidly fixed prostheses during the two-year evaluation period will be "the best".

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Loosening of prosthetic components continues to play a large role in total knee alloplasty (TKA) and need for revision. Osteolysis is an important part of prosthesis loosening, but we still do not completely understand the mechanism. Research has shown that mechanical factors such as weak bone cement and poor contact between cement/bone or cement/implant interphase contribute to loosening of implants. Survival of cemented TKA components also depend on a careful balancing of soft tissues around the knee, repair of lower extremity dislocations, design of the prosthesis and the level of patients' activities. Sclerosis of the proximal tibia can present a problem with regard to getting the cement to penetrate into the bone. Poor operative technique, such as high volume or high pressure lavage of the prepared bone surface, can result in reduced penetration of cement into the spongiosa and early failure of the prosthesis, measured as progressive radiolucent lines (RLLs). En tourniquet counter acts bleeding at the implant site and provides for better penetration of cement into the trabeculae of the bone. If the bone surface at the implantation site is contaminated with blood before the cement is applied, the shear strength in the bone/cement interphase can be reduced by up to 50%.

In prosthesis used in this study includes a tibial plateau with a central stem with stabilizing wings, the bottom surface of which is recessed by about 1 mm, so that a pocket is formed surrounded by a lip that provides for an even thickness of the cement layer beneath the tibial plateau. This assures that the cement is pressed down into the spongiosa during fixation of the implant. This design doubles the penetration of the cement compared with prostheses without a depressed baseplate. The company behind this design has had a successful follow-up of this system for more than 15 years. A good cement/implant interphase lessens the risk of penetration of debris into the interphase and thus reduces the risk for the development of osteolysis and aseptic loosening of the implant.

Fixation of knee alloplasties is done in 70% of cases with use of cement. It is uncertain whether there is a difference in the long-term survival of knee prostheses with the two types of cement used in this project. Both types of cement in this study are used today in knee surgery with good, short-term clinical results. It is important to investigate new types of cement in order to assure future patients the best possible results after knee alloplasty and fewer re-operations.

The goal of this scientific study is to determine whether there are differences in early migration and prosthesis-near bone density when a standard knee prosthesis is fixed with Refobacin Bone Cement R or with Refobacin Plus Bone Cement. Migration will be evaluated with RSA and bone density around the prosthesis with DEXA. The study will be successful if the prosthesis is fixed and remains in place throughout the entire period of the study, that is, that there is no increasing migration as measured by RSA. The cement type that ensures the largest number of solidly fixed prostheses during the two-year evaluation period will be "the best".

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

RSA Gonarthritis Bone Cement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Refobacin Bone Cement R

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Refobacin Bone Cement R

Intervention Type OTHER

Insertion of a knee prosthesis fixed by Refobacin Bone Cement R

2

Refobacin Plus Bone Cement

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Refobacin Plus Bone Cement

Intervention Type OTHER

Insertion of a knee prosthesis fixed by Refobacin Plus Bone Cement

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Refobacin Bone Cement R

Insertion of a knee prosthesis fixed by Refobacin Bone Cement R

Intervention Type OTHER

Refobacin Plus Bone Cement

Insertion of a knee prosthesis fixed by Refobacin Plus Bone Cement

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Biomet Europe: Refobacin Bone Cement R Biomet Europe: Refobacin Plus Bone Cement

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* primary or secondary knee osteoarthritis
* sufficient bone quality for total knee arthroplasty
* age above 70 years
* no upper age limit if the patient is capable
* informed and written consent
* patient can only enter the project with one knee

Exclusion Criteria

* neuromuscular or vascular disease in the affected leg
* preoperatively not found suitable for a knee arthroplasty
* patients with osteoporosis based on former diagnosis or preoperative DEXA-scan
* fracture sequelae or previous PTO or previous extensive knee surgery
* patients with need of a stem-elongation
* patients who cannot refrain from taking NSAID post-operatively
* continuous medical treatment with vitamin K antagonists (Warfarin) which is known to reduce the bon emineral density by a factor of 5
* patients with metabolic bone disease
* patients with rheumatoid arthritis
* postmenopausal women in estrogenic hormone substitution
* patients with a continuous need of systemic cortisone treatment
* non-Danish citizenship
* patients who do not comprehend the Danish language (read and speak)
* senile dementia
* alcoholism - defined as men drinking more than 21 units a week and women drinking more than 14 units a week
* drug abuse
* major psychiatric disease
* metastatic cancer disease and treatment with radiation therapy or chemotherapy
* severe systemic disease (e.g. hemi paresis and Parkinson disease)
* systemic hip and spine disease
* employee at the orthopaedic department, Aarhus University Hospital
* ongoing case regarding industrial injury insurance of the knee
* patients with poor dental status (risk of infection)
Minimum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aarhus University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Zimmer Biomet

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kjeld Soballe, MD, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Tage-Hansens Gade 2, 8000 Ã…rhus C, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20070237

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id