Comparison of Skin Substitutes Used in Burn Care

NCT ID: NCT00676013

Last Updated: 2019-12-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

158 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1997-12-31

Study Completion Date

2011-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if using a DERMAL LAYER under skin grafts:

1. will reduce scar formation of skin grafts
2. will reduce burn wound contractures
3. will improve functional outcome of joints requiring grafts

Compare scarring outcome of Dermal products

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Various skin substitutes are compared for healing, scar and functional and cosmetic outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Burns

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Burns Skin grafting AlloDerm Integra Homograft Autograft Burn Scar

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Alloderm, Integra, Homograft, Autograft

Burn debridement and grafting using interventions of 1) AlloDerm, 2) Integra, 3) Homograft and 4) Autograft on four separate sites on each patient

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Integra

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Grafting using the Commercial product Integra as a skin substitute over full thickness burn following excision.

AlloDerm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Grafting using the commercial product AlloDerm as a skin substitute

Homograft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Grafting using homograft as a skin substitute

Autograft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

grafting using patients own skin from a separate donor site

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Integra

Grafting using the Commercial product Integra as a skin substitute over full thickness burn following excision.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

AlloDerm

Grafting using the commercial product AlloDerm as a skin substitute

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Homograft

Grafting using homograft as a skin substitute

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Autograft

grafting using patients own skin from a separate donor site

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Artificial dermis Cadaver skin Cadaver Skin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Burn injury requiring grafting
* 0 years-90 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Partial thickness burns only
Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David N Herndon, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Texas

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Medical Branch

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

97-286

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id