Determine Tumor Response Using Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)- Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) Before and After Cetuximab in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00671437

Last Updated: 2017-03-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to collect data and evaluate how the tumor is broken down in response to standard of care cetuximab treatment by evaluating the FDG-PET/CT scans, toxicity, see how well the FDG-PET/CT scans predict response to treatment and survival.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Endpoint

To compare the SUV (standardized uptake value) at up to three target tumor sites as assessed by FDG-PET/CT of eligible patients at baseline and then after eight weeks of treatment with cetuximab.

Secondary Endpoints

* To determine the overall tumor metabolic response (complete metabolic response, partial metabolic response, stable metabolic disease or progressive metabolic disease \[CMR, PMR, SMD, or PMD\]) to eight weeks of scheduled weekly doses of cetuximab as assessed by FDG-PET/CT performed at baseline and then after therapy.
* To correlate the overall tumor metabolic response (CMR, PMR, SMD, or PMD) as assessed by FDG-PET/CT with the anatomic tumor response rate (complete response, partial response, stable disease or progressive disease \[CR, PR, SD, or PD\]) by RECIST criteria as assessed by CT and clinical examination performed after eight weeks of scheduled weekly doses of cetuximab.
* To correlate the overall tumor metabolic response (CMR, PMR, SMD, or PMD) as assessed by FDG-PET/CT and to correlate the overall anatomic tumor response (CR, PR, SD, or PD) by RECIST criteria as assessed by CT and clinical examination obtained at baseline and after eight weeks of treatment with weekly scheduled doses of cetuximab to TTP (time to progression) and OS (overall survival) with cetuximab therapy.
* To determine the overall best anatomic tumor response rate (CR, PR, SD, or PD) to cetuximab given until disease progression as assessed by RECIST criteria using CT and clinical examination.
* To determine the overall disease control rate (CR, PR, and SD) by RECIST criteria as assessed by CT and clinical examination and to determine the TTP and the OS with cetuximab therapy.
* To assess the toxicity profile for standard of care cetuximab given to patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1

Whole body FDG-PET/CT scan and CT scan of neck and chest (within 28 days of Day 1)

Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) over 2 hours on day 1 and 250 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, and 50.

Whole Body FDG-PET/CT scan and CT scan of neck and chest on Day 57 (prior to cetuximab infusion)

Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour on Day 57

Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour weekly until progressive disease

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FDG-PET/CT

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cetuximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FDG-PET/CT

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cetuximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Erbitux

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically proven diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).
* Have either locally recurrent, unresectable, previously irradiated SCCHN OR metastatic SCCHN, with at least one measurable tumor lesion (by CT scan) and at least one FDG avid (SUV \>/= 3, \>/= 1.5 cm) tumor lesion (by PET/CT).
* Age greater than 18 yrs.
* ECOG Performance Status of 0-3
* Signed IRB approved Informed Consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinical history of severe interstitial lung disease (not COPD)-as defined by prior pulmonary function tests (PFTs) with residual volume, total lung capacity, or corrected diffuse lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) \<30% of predicted. For this study, screening PFT's required only if clinically indicated.
* Prior therapy with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-specific monoclonal antibody (MAB) for treatment of metastatic SCCHN. Prior therapy with an EGFR-specific MAB as part of the definitive treatment of non-metastatic SCCHN is acceptable if this occurred more than three months previously. Prior therapy with an EGFR specific TKI will not be an exclusion factor.
* Women of child bearing potential who are current pregnant or breast feeding.
* Prior severe (Grade 4) infusion reaction to cetuximab.
* A serious uncontrolled medical disorder that in the opinion of the Investigator would impair the ability of the subject to receive protocol therapy.
* Chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or investigational agents given with the last 14 days.
* Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. (Subjects with a fasting blood glucose \> 200 at time of PET scanning may need to reschedule to another day after consulting with appropriate physicians.)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Douglas Adkins, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Louisville

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, Ghafoor A, Samuels A, Ward E, Feuer EJ, Thun MJ; American Cancer Society. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004 Jan-Feb;54(1):8-29. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.54.1.8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14974761 (View on PubMed)

Mendelsohn J, Baselga J. Status of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in the biology and treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15;21(14):2787-99. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.504.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12860957 (View on PubMed)

Dassonville O, Formento JL, Francoual M, Ramaioli A, Santini J, Schneider M, Demard F, Milano G. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and survival in upper aerodigestive tract cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Oct;11(10):1873-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.10.1873.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8410112 (View on PubMed)

Ang KK, Berkey BA, Tu X, Zhang HZ, Katz R, Hammond EH, Fu KK, Milas L. Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor expression on survival and pattern of relapse in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2002 Dec 15;62(24):7350-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12499279 (View on PubMed)

Huang S, Armstrong EA, Benavente S, Chinnaiyan P, Harari PM. Dual-agent molecular targeting of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR): combining anti-EGFR antibody with tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 1;64(15):5355-62. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0562.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15289342 (View on PubMed)

Cohen EE, Rosen F, Stadler WM, Recant W, Stenson K, Huo D, Vokes EE. Phase II trial of ZD1839 in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 15;21(10):1980-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.10.051.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12743152 (View on PubMed)

Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Azarnia N, Shin DM, Cohen RB, Jones CU, Sur R, Raben D, Jassem J, Ove R, Kies MS, Baselga J, Youssoufian H, Amellal N, Rowinsky EK, Ang KK. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 9;354(6):567-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa053422.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16467544 (View on PubMed)

Baselga J, Trigo JM, Bourhis J, Tortochaux J, Cortes-Funes H, Hitt R, Gascon P, Amellal N, Harstrick A, Eckardt A. Phase II multicenter study of the antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory metastatic and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5568-77. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.119. Epub 2005 Jul 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16009950 (View on PubMed)

J. Trigo et al., Cetuximab monotherapy is active in patients with platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Results of a phase II study (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 23 (2004), p. 487a.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Vermeersch H, Loose D, Ham H, Otte A, Van de Wiele C. Nuclear medicine imaging for the assessment of primary and recurrent head and neck carcinoma using routinely available tracers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 Dec;30(12):1689-700. doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1345-4. Epub 2003 Oct 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14574516 (View on PubMed)

Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, Dahmen G, Mueller SP, Beyer T, Bockisch A, Debatin JF, Freudenberg LS. Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Nov 1;22(21):4357-68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.120.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15514377 (View on PubMed)

Schwartz DL, Rajendran J, Yueh B, Coltrera MD, Leblanc M, Eary J, Krohn K. FDG-PET prediction of head and neck squamous cell cancer outcomes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Dec;130(12):1361-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.12.1361.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15611393 (View on PubMed)

Minn H, Lapela M, Klemi PJ, Grenman R, Leskinen S, Lindholm P, Bergman J, Eronen E, Haaparanta M, Joensuu H. Prediction of survival with fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxyglucose and PET in head and neck cancer. J Nucl Med. 1997 Dec;38(12):1907-11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9430467 (View on PubMed)

Brun E, Kjellen E, Tennvall J, Ohlsson T, Sandell A, Perfekt R, Perfekt R, Wennerberg J, Strand SE. FDG PET studies during treatment: prediction of therapy outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2002 Feb;24(2):127-35. doi: 10.1002/hed.10037.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11891942 (View on PubMed)

Weber WA, Ott K, Becker K, Dittler HJ, Helmberger H, Avril NE, Meisetschlager G, Busch R, Siewert JR, Schwaiger M, Fink U. Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jun 15;19(12):3058-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.12.3058.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11408502 (View on PubMed)

Choi NC, Fischman AJ, Niemierko A, Ryu JS, Lynch T, Wain J, Wright C, Fidias P, Mathisen D. Dose-response relationship between probability of pathologic tumor control and glucose metabolic rate measured with FDG PET after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Nov 15;54(4):1024-35. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03038-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12419428 (View on PubMed)

Kostakoglu L, Coleman M, Leonard JP, Kuji I, Zoe H, Goldsmith SJ. PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease. J Nucl Med. 2002 Aug;43(8):1018-27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12163626 (View on PubMed)

M. Beeram et al., Durable disease stabilization and antitumor activity with OSI-774 in renal cell carcinoma: A phase II, pharmacokinetic (PK) and biological correlative study with FDG-PET imaging. J Clinical Oncology 22 (2004), pp. 3050.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

T. Trarbach et al., A randomized phase I study of the humanized anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody EMD 72000 in subjects with advanced gastrointestinal cancers. J Clinical Oncology 22 (2004), pp. 3018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Goldstein D, Tan BS, Rossleigh M, Haindl W, Walker B, Dixon J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: correlation of F-FDG gamma camera-based coincidence positron emission tomography with CT for the assessment of treatment response--an AGITG study. Oncology. 2005;69(4):326-32. doi: 10.1159/000089765. Epub 2005 Nov 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16293972 (View on PubMed)

Antoch G, Kanja J, Bauer S, Kuehl H, Renzing-Koehler K, Schuette J, Bockisch A, Debatin JF, Freudenberg LS. Comparison of PET, CT, and dual-modality PET/CT imaging for monitoring of imatinib (STI571) therapy in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Nucl Med. 2004 Mar;45(3):357-65.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15001674 (View on PubMed)

Gayed I, Vu T, Iyer R, Johnson M, Macapinlac H, Swanston N, Podoloff D. The role of 18F-FDG PET in staging and early prediction of response to therapy of recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Nucl Med. 2004 Jan;45(1):17-21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14734662 (View on PubMed)

Bristol-Meyer-Squibb, Product Information for Erbitux, 2004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.siteman.wustl.edu

Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

08-0285 / 201107108

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

[18F]-AraG PET Imaging in LA HNSCC
NCT07168785 NOT_YET_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1