Comparison of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT00665834

Last Updated: 2016-03-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-04-30

Study Completion Date

2007-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a 3-month, randomized, parallel-group study with 2 periods, comparing the efficacy and the safety of rosuvastatin 20 mg versus atorvastatin 80 mg in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with ACS (acute coronary syndrome) constitute a high-risk population with unstable coronary disease (CHD) that differs from stable CHD primarily in short term prognosis (prediction of outcome). The 1-year rate of death or non-fatal MI (myocardial infarction or heart attack) was 13% in patients with ACS in a recent controlled study (FRISC II 1999), compared with less than 2% in patients with stable CHD (SAPAT 1992). Thus, despite substantial progress in the treatment of ACS with antiplatelet and anti-thrombotic medications (blood thinners), additional therapies are needed to reduce the additional risk associated with unstable CHD. Current guidelines (NCEP 2001) recommend that patients admitted with a major coronary event (MI or ACS) should be considered for treatment with a statin on discharge from the hospital.

Cited advantages of this approach are patient motivation to start therapy at that time and prevention of a "treatment gap" due to inconsistent outpatient follow-up. A previously randomized controlled study of statin therapy in ACS patients (MIRACL study), showed that aggressive cholesterol lowering with atorvastatin 80 mg between 24 and 96 hours after hospital admission in patients with ACS resulted in reduced incidence of recurrent CHD events at 16 weeks. However, the study excluded patients who underwent revascularization (PCI). Thus the study enrolled only a subset of the ACS population.

There is also emerging data from clinical studies supporting the anti-inflammatory actions of statins. One recent randomized controlled study demonstrated that statins decrease the levels of CRP, considered to be a marker of intra-arterial inflammation and a predictor of recurrent adverse cardiovascular events. The relative levels of various lipid measurements, such as LDL-C, triglycerides and HDL-C probably influence the inflammatory and thrombotic (blood clotting) properties, but the exact relationship is not clear. The anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic properties of different statins are likely related to their impact on the lipid profile and their different pleiotropic properties (producing more than one genetic effect).

The present study is designed to compare the effects of rosuvastatin 20 mg versus atorvastatin 80 mg started at maximum 6 days after an ACS to lipid profile (blood cholesterol). Additionally, the hypothesis of beneficial effect on inflammatory markers compared with statins started later will be tested.

c) Summary of study design:

This is a 3-month, randomized, parallel-group study with 2 periods, comparing the efficacy and the safety of rosuvastatin 20 mg versus atorvastatin 80 mg in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

* The study comprises a 1st double blind, placebo controlled, period that starts at the admission of the patient for an ACS (clinical symptoms less than 24 hours) until hospital discharge (or a maximum timeline of 6 days).
* The 2nd double blind, double dummy, period starts at Day 0 (i.e. from the hospital discharge or at a maximum of 6 days after admission) and will last 3 months. After validation of eligibility criteria (including a 1st local assessment of CK, creatinine, ALT and an ECG) and the planning of a PCI between 24 hours and 4 days after admission, patients will be randomized into 3 groups:

1. early started rosuvastatin 20 mg from admission until the end of the study (group 1 - early rosuvastatin 20 mg),
2. placebo from admission until Day O (i.e. until hospital discharge or for a maximum of 6 days) followed by rosuvastatin 20 mg until the end of the study (group 2 - late rosuvastatin 20 mg),
3. placebo from admission until Day O (i.e. until hospital discharge or for a maximum of 6 days) followed by atorvastatin 80 mg until the end of the study (group 3 - atorvastatin 80 mg).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dyslipidemia Acute Coronary Syndromes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Rosuvastatin 20 mg versus placebo 20 mg

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

rosuvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

rosuvastatin 20 mg from day 0 to (maximum) day 6

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo 20 mg from day 0 to (maximum) day 6

2

rosuvastatin 20 mg versus atorvastatin 80 mg

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

rosuvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

rosuvastatin 20 mg from discharge until the end of the study

atorvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

atorvastatin 80 mg from discharge until the end of the study

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rosuvastatin

rosuvastatin 20 mg from day 0 to (maximum) day 6

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

placebo 20 mg from day 0 to (maximum) day 6

Intervention Type DRUG

rosuvastatin

rosuvastatin 20 mg from discharge until the end of the study

Intervention Type DRUG

atorvastatin

atorvastatin 80 mg from discharge until the end of the study

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men or women who are between 18 and 75 years old
* Patients diagnosed with non ST elevation - acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS)
* Patients with onset of clinical symptoms less than 24 hours prior to their admission for which a PCI is planned or anticipated.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with STEMI (ST elevation myocardial infarction-heart attack) and primary PCI planned within 24 hours of admission will not be included.
* Patients will not be allowed to have taken any cholesterol-lowering medications during 1 month prior to enrolment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Queen's University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Stephen LaHaye

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephen A LaHaye, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Queen's University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kingston General Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Vascular Disease Prevention and Research Centre, Hotel Dieu Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DMED 938-06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.