Bisphosphonates and Impaction Grafting in Hip Revision

NCT ID: NCT00658268

Last Updated: 2017-08-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-03-31

Study Completion Date

2017-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary focus of this study is to investigate whether increased bone density of the graft in revision arthroplasty of the hip can cause a decreased micromotion of the implant relative to the femur.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Morsellized compacted bone allograft can be used for revision arthroplasty of the hip. Treating the graft locally with an antiresorptive substance such as a bisphosphonate has decreased the graft resorption in animal studies and led to a remained bone density in a human series of 16 patients. In the present study we investigate if this increased bone density of the graft also causes a decreased micromotion of the implant relative the femur. 36 patients are planned to participate in a 1:1 randomized and prospective study comparing the bisphosphonate Clodronate to saline. Primary outcome will be micromotion over the first year but also secondary parameters such as late micromotion (between 12 and 24 months), re-loosening subjective outcome and safety.

We hypothesize that rinsing the graft in a bisphosphonate solution prevents its resorption and therefore may reduce the risk of mechanical failure. Patients are followed with radiograms, RSA (radiostereography) preop, postop, at 6 weeks, at 12 and 24 months and subjective months and subjective parameters including Womac and SF 12. The treatment is simple, cheap and appears virtually risk-free.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aseptic Loosening of the Hip Prosthesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Clodronate

Intervention Type DRUG

60 mg/ml, 10 ml, single dose mixed in bone graft at operation

2

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

10 ml, single dose mixed in bone graft at operation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Clodronate

60 mg/ml, 10 ml, single dose mixed in bone graft at operation

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

10 ml, single dose mixed in bone graft at operation

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with aseptic loosening and osteolysis scheduled for hip revision using allograft and impaction technique
* Obtained informed consent
* Pregnancy excluded in women of childbearing age

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with known renal disease or S-creatinine \>175 mcmol/L
* Patients with S-calcium 2.75 mmol/L
* Patients with diagnosed Rheumatoid arthritis
* Patients with active primary hyperparathyroidism
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Region Skane

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Magnus Tagil, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Orthopaedics, Lund University Hospital,Lund, Sweden

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lund University Hospital

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EudraCT2006-006439-39

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NKOISR10001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

GBR and Autogenous Bone Chips
NCT03946020 COMPLETED NA