Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Findings in Patients Receiving Cellcept®
NCT ID: NCT00652834
Last Updated: 2016-03-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
23 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-04-30
2011-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy in Visualization of the UGI and Small Intestine
NCT05069233
Magnetic Steering Improves Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Completion Rate
NCT03482661
Evaluation of Performance Characteristics of Capsule Endoscopy With PillCam UGI Capsule Compared to Standard Endoscopy
NCT03167970
Mast Cells in Acid-induced Intestinal Permeability
NCT02664051
A Comparison of SmartPill Capsule With Scintigraphy for Determining Gastric Residence Time
NCT00128284
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
kidney recipients with GI symptoms
This was a four-week study designed to investigate GI mucosal lesions by SBCE in kidney transplant recipients who were using MMF, and to examine the changes in clinical symptoms and intestinal mucosa lesions 30 days after switching over from MMF to EC-MPS. The patient was switched from MMF to EC-MPS (Myfortic) on the equimola basis.
Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE)
SBCE will be performed at Day 2 and Day 30.
myfortic
switching from mycophenolate mofetil to mycophenolic acid on equimolar basis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE)
SBCE will be performed at Day 2 and Day 30.
myfortic
switching from mycophenolate mofetil to mycophenolic acid on equimolar basis
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Recipients of first or second cadaveric, living unrelated or living related kidney transplant.
* Recipients who are at least 4 weeks post renal transplantation with stable renal function.
* Patients who have used MMF at least 10 days and are currently receiving MMF. (up to 3g/day dosage allowed)
* Patients with at least one moderate or severe upper or lower GI complaints.
* Patients' immunosuppressive regimen other than steroids as well as medication for treatment of GI symptoms must be unchanged for at least 1 week prior to study start.
* Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to the inclusion period. Effective contraception must be used during the trial, and for 4 weeks following discontinuation of the study medication.
* Patients who are willing and able to participate in the full course of the study and from whom written informed consent has been obtained.
Exclusion Criteria
* The presence of a severe GI disorder. History of a significant GI disorder prior to transplant that has remained unchanged since transplant and/or the introduction of MMF will exclude patient.
* Evidence of any GI disorder induced by an infection, underlying medical condition, or concomitant medication other than MMF.
* Modification of GI medication or MMF dose within last 1 week.
* Evidence of graft rejection, treatment of acute rejection, or unstable renal function within 4 weeks prior to the Baseline visit.
* Patients who have received an investigational immunosuppressive drug within 4 weeks prior to study entry.
* Patients with a history of malignancy within the last five years, except excised squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
* Pregnant or nursing women.
* Patients with thrombocytopenia (\<75,000/mm3), with an absolute neutrophil count of \<1,500/mm3 and/or leukocytopenia (\<3,500/mm3), and/or hemoglobin \<9.0 g/dL prior to enrollment.
* Presence of clinically significant pyrexia and/or infection requiring continued therapy.
* Evidence of severe liver disease \[incl. abnormal liver profile i.e. AST, ALT or total bilirubin = 3 times the upper limit of normal\].
* Patients who have any anatomical GI tract defects which have risk of capsule getting stuck such as tumor or previous abdominal surgery.
* Abnormal physical or laboratory findings of clinical significance within 2 weeks of inclusion which would interfere with the objectives of the study.
* Patients with symptoms of significant illness or evidence of current drug and/or alcohol abuse.
* Inability to self-administer the GSRS \& OTE questionnaire.
* Use of other investigational drugs at the time of enrollment, or within 30 days or 5 half-lives of enrollment, whichever is longer.
* History of hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or to drugs with similar chemical structures.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis
INDUSTRY
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Suphamai Bunnapradist
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
suphamai bunnapradist, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, Los Angeles
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Shaw LM, Sollinger HW, Halloran P, Morris RE, Yatscoff RW, Ransom J, Tsina I, Keown P, Holt DW, Lieberman R, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil: a report of the consensus panel. Ther Drug Monit. 1995 Dec;17(6):690-9. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199512000-00025. No abstract available.
Ojo AO, Meier-Kriesche HU, Hanson JA, Leichtman AB, Cibrik D, Magee JC, Wolfe RA, Agodoa LY, Kaplan B. Mycophenolate mofetil reduces late renal allograft loss independent of acute rejection. Transplantation. 2000 Jun 15;69(11):2405-9. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200006150-00033.
Meier-Kriesche HU, Steffen BJ, Hochberg AM, Gordon RD, Liebman MN, Morris JA, Kaplan B. Long-term use of mycophenolate mofetil is associated with a reduction in the incidence and risk of late rejection. Am J Transplant. 2003 Jan;3(1):68-73. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.30112.x.
Behrend M. Adverse gastrointestinal effects of mycophenolate mofetil: aetiology, incidence and management. Drug Saf. 2001;24(9):645-63. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200124090-00002.
Salvadori M, Holzer H, de Mattos A, Sollinger H, Arns W, Oppenheimer F, Maca J, Hall M; ERL B301 Study Groups. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium is therapeutically equivalent to mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients. Am J Transplant. 2004 Feb;4(2):231-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-6143.2003.00337.x.
Dimenas E, Carlsson G, Glise H, Israelsson B, Wiklund I. Relevance of norm values as part of the documentation of quality of life instruments for use in upper gastrointestinal disease. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1996;221:8-13. doi: 10.3109/00365529609095544.
Kleinman L, Faull R, Walker R, Ramesh Prasad GV, Ambuehl P, Bahner U. Gastrointestinal-specific patient-reported outcome instruments differentiate between renal transplant patients with or without GI complications. Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):846-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.106.
Bunnapradist S, Sampaio MS, Wilkinson AH, Pham PT, Huang E, Kuo HT, Anastasi B, Danovitch GM, Lo SK. Changes in the small bowel of symptomatic kidney transplant recipients converted from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium. Am J Nephrol. 2014;40(2):184-90. doi: 10.1159/000365360. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11-001911
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.