Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Findings in Patients Receiving Cellcept®

NCT ID: NCT00652834

Last Updated: 2016-03-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

23 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-04-30

Study Completion Date

2011-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to learn more about symptoms and gastrointestinal lesions associated with taking myfortic® by switching patients to a delayed release formulation that is developed to alleviate GI symptoms. A comparison of the frequency and severity of GI symptoms observed in patients treated with MMF (cellcept®) after conversion to myfortic® will be measured by using a self-assessed questionnaire called Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). To prove the incidence and improvement of GI lesions in patients treated with MMF (cellcept®) after conversion to myfortic® will be measured by using Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy (SBCE).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Myfortic® recently introduced to the market has shown to be similar to MMF in how effectively it works and how well it is tolerated. Both drugs have the same active ingredient, but they are different in the way that they deliver them to the body. Myfortic® is an advanced, enteric coated formulation of mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) that delays the release of the active ingredient, MPA. MPA has more potent effects on the lymphocytes than other cells. This makes for improved GI tolerability of the MPA therapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastrointestinal Lesions Signs and Symptoms, Digestive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

kidney recipients with GI symptoms

This was a four-week study designed to investigate GI mucosal lesions by SBCE in kidney transplant recipients who were using MMF, and to examine the changes in clinical symptoms and intestinal mucosa lesions 30 days after switching over from MMF to EC-MPS. The patient was switched from MMF to EC-MPS (Myfortic) on the equimola basis.

Group Type OTHER

Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

SBCE will be performed at Day 2 and Day 30.

myfortic

Intervention Type DRUG

switching from mycophenolate mofetil to mycophenolic acid on equimolar basis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE)

SBCE will be performed at Day 2 and Day 30.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

myfortic

switching from mycophenolate mofetil to mycophenolic acid on equimolar basis

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PillCamEso EC-MPS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female patients between 18 and 75 years of age.
* Recipients of first or second cadaveric, living unrelated or living related kidney transplant.
* Recipients who are at least 4 weeks post renal transplantation with stable renal function.
* Patients who have used MMF at least 10 days and are currently receiving MMF. (up to 3g/day dosage allowed)
* Patients with at least one moderate or severe upper or lower GI complaints.
* Patients' immunosuppressive regimen other than steroids as well as medication for treatment of GI symptoms must be unchanged for at least 1 week prior to study start.
* Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to the inclusion period. Effective contraception must be used during the trial, and for 4 weeks following discontinuation of the study medication.
* Patients who are willing and able to participate in the full course of the study and from whom written informed consent has been obtained.

Exclusion Criteria

* Multi-organ transplant patients or previous transplant with any other organ different from kidney.
* The presence of a severe GI disorder. History of a significant GI disorder prior to transplant that has remained unchanged since transplant and/or the introduction of MMF will exclude patient.
* Evidence of any GI disorder induced by an infection, underlying medical condition, or concomitant medication other than MMF.
* Modification of GI medication or MMF dose within last 1 week.
* Evidence of graft rejection, treatment of acute rejection, or unstable renal function within 4 weeks prior to the Baseline visit.
* Patients who have received an investigational immunosuppressive drug within 4 weeks prior to study entry.
* Patients with a history of malignancy within the last five years, except excised squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
* Pregnant or nursing women.
* Patients with thrombocytopenia (\<75,000/mm3), with an absolute neutrophil count of \<1,500/mm3 and/or leukocytopenia (\<3,500/mm3), and/or hemoglobin \<9.0 g/dL prior to enrollment.
* Presence of clinically significant pyrexia and/or infection requiring continued therapy.
* Evidence of severe liver disease \[incl. abnormal liver profile i.e. AST, ALT or total bilirubin = 3 times the upper limit of normal\].
* Patients who have any anatomical GI tract defects which have risk of capsule getting stuck such as tumor or previous abdominal surgery.
* Abnormal physical or laboratory findings of clinical significance within 2 weeks of inclusion which would interfere with the objectives of the study.
* Patients with symptoms of significant illness or evidence of current drug and/or alcohol abuse.
* Inability to self-administer the GSRS \& OTE questionnaire.
* Use of other investigational drugs at the time of enrollment, or within 30 days or 5 half-lives of enrollment, whichever is longer.
* History of hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or to drugs with similar chemical structures.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Suphamai Bunnapradist

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

suphamai bunnapradist, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, Los Angeles

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shaw LM, Sollinger HW, Halloran P, Morris RE, Yatscoff RW, Ransom J, Tsina I, Keown P, Holt DW, Lieberman R, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil: a report of the consensus panel. Ther Drug Monit. 1995 Dec;17(6):690-9. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199512000-00025. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8588243 (View on PubMed)

Ojo AO, Meier-Kriesche HU, Hanson JA, Leichtman AB, Cibrik D, Magee JC, Wolfe RA, Agodoa LY, Kaplan B. Mycophenolate mofetil reduces late renal allograft loss independent of acute rejection. Transplantation. 2000 Jun 15;69(11):2405-9. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200006150-00033.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10868649 (View on PubMed)

Meier-Kriesche HU, Steffen BJ, Hochberg AM, Gordon RD, Liebman MN, Morris JA, Kaplan B. Long-term use of mycophenolate mofetil is associated with a reduction in the incidence and risk of late rejection. Am J Transplant. 2003 Jan;3(1):68-73. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.30112.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12492713 (View on PubMed)

Behrend M. Adverse gastrointestinal effects of mycophenolate mofetil: aetiology, incidence and management. Drug Saf. 2001;24(9):645-63. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200124090-00002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11522119 (View on PubMed)

Salvadori M, Holzer H, de Mattos A, Sollinger H, Arns W, Oppenheimer F, Maca J, Hall M; ERL B301 Study Groups. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium is therapeutically equivalent to mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients. Am J Transplant. 2004 Feb;4(2):231-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-6143.2003.00337.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14974944 (View on PubMed)

Dimenas E, Carlsson G, Glise H, Israelsson B, Wiklund I. Relevance of norm values as part of the documentation of quality of life instruments for use in upper gastrointestinal disease. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1996;221:8-13. doi: 10.3109/00365529609095544.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9110389 (View on PubMed)

Kleinman L, Faull R, Walker R, Ramesh Prasad GV, Ambuehl P, Bahner U. Gastrointestinal-specific patient-reported outcome instruments differentiate between renal transplant patients with or without GI complications. Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):846-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.106.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15848552 (View on PubMed)

Bunnapradist S, Sampaio MS, Wilkinson AH, Pham PT, Huang E, Kuo HT, Anastasi B, Danovitch GM, Lo SK. Changes in the small bowel of symptomatic kidney transplant recipients converted from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium. Am J Nephrol. 2014;40(2):184-90. doi: 10.1159/000365360. Epub 2014 Sep 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25196230 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11-001911

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.