Evaluation of Risk Minimization, Assessment and Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Pain Taking Avinza

NCT ID: NCT00640042

Last Updated: 2012-06-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

1570 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-03-31

Study Completion Date

2008-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to provide information in a broad, "real world" population of chronic pain patients assessing both pain control with AVINZA as well as the potential risk for misuse and abuse.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pain affects more Americans than diabetes, heart disease and cancer combined and although it is one of the earliest known ailments, pain is still without a universal cure. It is estimated that only about 25% of patients with chronic pain receive adequate analgesia.

Long-term treatment of chronic pain with opioids is recognized as an important treatment option for patients with moderate-severe pain related to cancer and other chronic serious illnesses. AVINZA (morphine sulfate extended-release capsules) was approved for marketing by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2002 as a once daily treatment for the relief of moderate to severe pain requiring continuous opioid therapy for an extended period of time. While opioids, such as AVINZA, are beneficial in the management of chronic pain, they are sometimes associated with illicit activities. Misuse, abuse and diversion of controlled prescription drugs, particularly opioids, are problems that have increased dramatically in the United States (U.S.) since the 1990s.

This study will follow the Federation of State Medical Boards Model Policy for the Use of Controlled Substances for the Treatment of Pain. Patients will be counseled on the proper storage and destruction of unused AVINZA in accordance with federal and applicable state laws. A universal precautions approach to chronic pain management (KAIR) will be utilized in this study. Although not validated as a risk assessment and management instrument, KAIR is designed to assist clinicians with responsibly managing chronic moderate-severe pain patients prescribed AVINZA. The KAIR tools will be used by the Investigator to determine the level of monitoring required based on the patient's potential risk for opioid misuse or abuse (KAIR level). Investigators and staff participating in this study will be required to participate in a training program on the counseling to be given, procedures to be followed and tools to be used in this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

morphine sulfate extended release capsules

Intervention Type DRUG

30 mg, 60 mg, 90 mg, 120 mg morphine will be prescribed by the Investigator in accordance with the AVINZA prescribing information.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

morphine sulfate extended release capsules

30 mg, 60 mg, 90 mg, 120 mg morphine will be prescribed by the Investigator in accordance with the AVINZA prescribing information.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AVINZA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient is an adult (greater than or equal to 21 years old
* Patient has chronic (greater than or equal to 3 months) moderate-severe pain who, at the discretion of the Investigator, requires an around-the-clock opioid for optimal analgesia. Patients may be opioid naïve (not currently on an opioid) or opioid tolerant. Opioid naïve patients with a pain score of greater than or equal to 4 on an 11-point NRS (numerical rating scale. OR Opioid tolerant patients experiencing suboptimal response (i.e. pain score of greater than or equal to 4) or unacceptable side effects to sustained release opioids or short-acting opioids.
* Patient is able to read and understand English and comply with protocol requirements.

Exclusion Criteria

* Hypersensitivity to morphine, morphine salts, or any components of AVINZA
* Respiratory depression (slowed breathing)
* Acute or severe bronchial asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
* Currently has or is suspected of having paralytic ileus
* Requires a daily dose of AVINZA greater than 1600mg/day
* Patient is abusing alcohol
* Pregnancy or breast feeding
* Currently taking AVINZA
* Patient unwilling to sign the Treatment Agreement
* Life expectancy is less than 2 months
* Migraine as the primary pain score
* Patient resides in a hospital or nursing home
* Patient has had more than 2 surgeries for low back pain
* Patient is anticipated to require major surgery or steroid injections for chronic pain over the next 12 weeks
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pfizer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sherry Siegel, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

King Pharmaceuticals is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Adamsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Sun City, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Sun Lakes, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Burlingame, California, United States

Site Status

Castro Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Hemet, California, United States

Site Status

Lakewood, California, United States

Site Status

Livermore, California, United States

Site Status

Los Gatos, California, United States

Site Status

Murrieta, California, United States

Site Status

Murrieta, California, United States

Site Status

Nevada City, California, United States

Site Status

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Rocklin, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

West Hollywood, California, United States

Site Status

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

Yuba City, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Fort Collins, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Fort Collins, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Northglenn, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Thornton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Manchester, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Milford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

North Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Norwich, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Georgetown, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Milton, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Apopka, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Brandon, Florida, United States

Site Status

Cape Coral, Florida, United States

Site Status

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Delray Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Deltona, Florida, United States

Site Status

Dunnellon, Florida, United States

Site Status

Estero, Florida, United States

Site Status

Eustis, Florida, United States

Site Status

Loxahatchee Groves, Florida, United States

Site Status

Maitland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Margate, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Mt. Dora, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Smyrna Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

North Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Oakland Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Oldsmar, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ormond Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Oviedo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Royal Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

South Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Cave Spring, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Conyers, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Covington, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Rome, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Statesboro, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Sugar Hill, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Rexburg, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Clinton, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Crestwood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Creve Coeur, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Danville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

DeKalb, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Elmwood Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Flossmoor, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Gurnee, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Lockport, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Maryville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Morton, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Naperville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Oak Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Oak Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Pekin, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

St. Charles, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Washington, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Washington, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Zion, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Anderson, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Anderson, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Anderson, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Franklin, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Highland, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

La Porte, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Lawrenceburg, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Newburgh, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Rushville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Seymour, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Whiteland, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Le Claire, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Newton, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Shawnee, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Florence, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

London, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Monticello, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Russell Springs, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Somerset, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Chester, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Havre de Grace, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Ocean City, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Brockton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Clarkston, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Clinton, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Dearborn, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Dearborn Heights, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Farmington Hills, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Leslie, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Livonia, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Mason, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Muskegon, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Muskegon, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Northville, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Okemos, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Okemos, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Owosso, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Pigeon, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Rochester Hills, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Southgate, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Sterling Heights, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Waterford, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Cold Spring, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Ballwin, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Cape Girardeau, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Chesterfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Clinton, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Florissant, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Hazelwood, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Mexico, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Mount Vernon, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Platte City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Raymore, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Saint Charles, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Saint Joseph, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Warrenton, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Weston, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Atco, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Blackwood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Bloomfield, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Brigantine, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

East Orange, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Green Brook, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Irvington, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Irvington, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Iselin, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Jersey City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Jersey City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Kenilworth, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Lakewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Mays Landing, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Millburn, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Millburn, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Nutley, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Scotch Plains, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

South Bound Brook, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Totowa, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Union, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Wenonah, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Westville, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Glendale, New York, United States

Site Status

Kenmore, New York, United States

Site Status

Mayville, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Orchard Park, New York, United States

Site Status

Port Jefferson Station, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Staten Island, New York, United States

Site Status

Staten Island, New York, United States

Site Status

Suffern, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ashtabula, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Bowling Green, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Canal Winchester, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Defiance, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Fairfield, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Fremont, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Gahanna, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Genoa, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Hamilton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Hamilton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Kent, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Kingston, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Maumee, Ohio, United States

Site Status

New Lexington, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Perrysburg, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Pickerington, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Springboro, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Stow, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Warren, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Youngstown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Youngstown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Stillwater, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Estacada, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Lake Oswego, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Milwaukie, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Oregon City, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Salem, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Tualatin, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Aliquippa, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Archbald, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Aston Mills, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Avoca, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Carbondale, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Chicora, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Conneaut Lake, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Cowansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Downingtown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Doylestown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Drums, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Dublin, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Elizabeth, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Ford City, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greensburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Honesdale, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Levittown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

McKeesport, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Montrose, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Moon Township, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Morrisville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Mount Pleasant, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

New Castle, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

New Wilmington, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Norristown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Royersford, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Shippensburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Southampton, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Stoneboro, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Union City, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Warminster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Yardley, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Camden, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Marion, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Marion, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

West Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ashland City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Collierville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dyersburg, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Hendersonville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Hermitage, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Lebanon, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

McKenzie, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Newport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Sweetwater, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Woodbury, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Irving, Texas, United States

Site Status

Rusk, Texas, United States

Site Status

Southlake, Texas, United States

Site Status

Layton, Utah, United States

Site Status

Layton, Utah, United States

Site Status

South Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Valley City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Annandale, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Ashburn, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Lynchburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Reston, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Edmonds, Washington, United States

Site Status

Marysville, Washington, United States

Site Status

Olympia, Washington, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Huntington, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Carolina, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Cidra, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Hato Rey, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Juncos, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Ponce, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Puerto Rico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

The American Pain Foundation. Pain Facts & Figures. January 2007. Available from http://www.painfoundation.org/print.asp?file=Newsroom/PainFacts.htm.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Weiner KA. The decade of pain control and research. The Pain Practitioner. 2003 Spring;13(1):3-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Joranson DE, Berger JW. Regulatory issues in pain management. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2000 Sep-Oct;40(5 Suppl 1):S60-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11029873 (View on PubMed)

Caldwell JR, Rapoport RJ, Davis JC, Offenberg HL, Marker HW, Roth SH, Yuan W, Eliot L, Babul N, Lynch PM. Efficacy and safety of a once-daily morphine formulation in chronic, moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis pain: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial and an open-label extension trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Apr;23(4):278-91. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00383-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11997197 (View on PubMed)

Rauck RL, Bookbinder SA, Bunker TR, Alftine CD, Ghalie R, Negro-Vilar A, de Jong E, Gershon S. The ACTION study: a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial comparing once-a-day extended-release morphine sulfate capsules (AVINZA) to twice-a-day controlled-release oxycodone hydrochloride tablets (OxyContin) for the treatment of chronic, moderate to severe low back pain. J Opioid Manag. 2006 May-Jun;2(3):155-66. doi: 10.5055/jom.2006.0025.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17319449 (View on PubMed)

Rauck RL, Bookbinder SA, Bunker TR, Alftine CD, Ghalie R, Negro-Vilar A, de Jong E, Gershon S. A randomized, open-label study of once-a-day AVINZA (morphine sulfate extended-release capsules) versus twice-a-day OxyContin (oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release tablets) for chronic low back pain: the extension phase of the ACTION trial. J Opioid Manag. 2006 Nov-Dec;2(6):325-8, 331-3. doi: 10.5055/jom.2006.0048.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17326594 (View on PubMed)

Rosenthal M, Moore P, Groves E, Iwan T, Schlosser LG, Dziewanowska Z, Negro-Vilar A. Sleep improves when patients with chronic OA pain are managed with morning dosing of once a day extended-release morphine sulfate (AVINZA): findings from a pilot study. J Opioid Manag. 2007 May-Jun;3(3):145-54. doi: 10.5055/jom.2007.0052.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18027540 (View on PubMed)

Katz NP, Adams EH, Chilcoat H, Colucci RD, Comer SD, Goliber P, Grudzinskas C, Jasinski D, Lande SD, Passik SD, Schnoll SH, Sellers E, Travers D, Weiss R. Challenges in the development of prescription opioid abuse-deterrent formulations. Clin J Pain. 2007 Oct;23(8):648-60. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318125c5e8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17885342 (View on PubMed)

Ives TJ, Chelminski PR, Hammett-Stabler CA, Malone RM, Perhac JS, Potisek NM, Shilliday BB, DeWalt DA, Pignone MP. Predictors of opioid misuse in patients with chronic pain: a prospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 4;6:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-46.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16595013 (View on PubMed)

Gourlay DL, Heit HA, Almahrezi A. Universal precautions in pain medicine: a rational approach to the treatment of chronic pain. Pain Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;6(2):107-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.05031.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15773874 (View on PubMed)

Setnik B, Roland CL, Pixton GC, Sommerville KW. Prescription opioid abuse and misuse: gap between primary-care investigator assessment and actual extent of these behaviors among patients with chronic pain. Postgrad Med. 2017 Jan;129(1):5-11. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1245585. Epub 2016 Oct 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27782769 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

K284-07-4001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pain Control Following Sinus Surgery
NCT03783702 COMPLETED PHASE4