A Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Sustained-release Hydromorphone (a Strong Opioid) in Patients With Chronic Noncancer Pain.

NCT ID: NCT00261495

Last Updated: 2014-06-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

504 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-03-31

Study Completion Date

2008-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of sustained- release hydromorphone, formulated to release slowly over time, taken once daily, and controlled- release oxycodone taken twice daily, in patients with chronic non-cancer pain. The study will also determine the dose of sustained-release hydromorphone that provides a level of pain control that is equal to the pain control provided by control-released oxycodone (equi-analgesic dosage).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conventional immediate-release forms of hydromorphone and oxycodone have a relatively short duration of action that require dosing every 4 to 6 hours. To counterbalance the drawback of repeated opioid intake, sustained-release formulations of oxycodone and hydromorphone were developed that allow twice-daily dosing. Subsequently, a novel, once-daily, extended-release hydromorphone formulation was developed to further enhance ease of treatment and improve effectiveness in the treatment of severe pain. This is a randomized, open-label, comparative, parallel-group, 24-week flexible-dose study in patients with chronic noncancer pain severe enough to require continuous opioid therapy. Patients will receive either 8 mg of sustained-release hydromorphone, taken once daily or 10 mg of controlled-release oxycodone, taken twice daily. Individual adjustments in dosing will be performed to achieve satisfactory pain control, up to a maximum daily dosage of 32 mg for hydromorphone and 80 mg for oxycodone. The primary efficacy outcome will be the determination of the dose of hydromorphone that produces a level of pain control that is equal to the pain control provided by oxycodone (equi-analgesic dose). Safety will be monitored throughout the study. The study hypothesis is that sustained-release hydromorphone taken once daily is well tolerated and is not inferior with regard to pain control to controlled-release oxycodone taken twice daily.

Amendment:

Amendment was made to the duration of the study from duration of '24 weeks' to '52 weeks' in order to collect long-term safety and efficacy data. OROS hydromorphone 8, 16, or 32 mg tablets QD or SR oxycodone 10, 20, or 40 mg tablets BID. Individual adjustments in dosing performed to achieve satisfactory pain control over 24 weeks. Amendment: treatment duration was extended to 52 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Oxycodone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oxycodone

Intervention Type DRUG

10, 20, or 40 mg twice a day for 52 weeks (flexible dosing)

OROS hydromorphone HCl

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

OROS hydromorphone HCl

Intervention Type DRUG

8 to 32 mg once daily for 52 weeks (flexible dosing)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

OROS hydromorphone HCl

8 to 32 mg once daily for 52 weeks (flexible dosing)

Intervention Type DRUG

Oxycodone

10, 20, or 40 mg twice a day for 52 weeks (flexible dosing)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients with chronic noncancer pain severe enough to require continuous opioid therapy (a score of at least 5 in "pain right now" on a 11 point numeric rating scale) who have never received an opioid or are currently treated with a weak opioid, and who experience insufficient pain control.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have been treated with strong opioids (including hydromorphone and oxycodone) within the last 4 weeks prior to study inclusion or who will probably undergo any treatment (e.g. neurological techniques, surgery) within the next 6 months, which may abruptly alter degree or nature of pain experienced
* patients with a history of disease(s), current illness, or therapy which would preclude them from participation in the study
* and patients who are pregnant or nursing.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Esbjerg, , Denmark

Site Status

Nyborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Svendborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Vejle, , Denmark

Site Status

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Bois-Guillaume, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Drensteinfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Duderstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Giessen, , Germany

Site Status

Göppingen, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Herne, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Kÿln, , Germany

Site Status

Ludwigshafen, , Germany

Site Status

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Nuremberg, , Germany

Site Status

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Rodgau, , Germany

Site Status

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Bodø, , Norway

Site Status

Lørenskog, , Norway

Site Status

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Banská Bystrica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Martin, , Slovakia

Site Status

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status

Maribor, , Slovenia

Site Status

Slovenj Gradec, , Slovenia

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Jönköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Kristianstad, , Sweden

Site Status

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Aarau, , Switzerland

Site Status

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Lausanne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Czechia Denmark France Germany Norway Poland Slovakia Slovenia Sweden Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Binsfeld H, Szczepanski L, Waechter S, Richarz U, Sabatowski R. A randomized study to demonstrate noninferiority of once-daily OROS((R)) hydromorphone with twice-daily sustained-release oxycodone for moderate to severe chronic noncancer pain. Pain Pract. 2010 Sep-Oct;10(5):404-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00342.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20384968 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OROS-ANA-3001

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2004-005187-24

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR002374

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.