The Incretin Effect in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis

NCT ID: NCT00638573

Last Updated: 2010-01-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-31

Study Completion Date

2006-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The phenomenon that oral glucose elicits a higher insulin response than does intravenous (iv) glucose, even at identical plasma glucose (PG) profiles (isoglycemia), is called the incretin effect. In type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) the incretin effect has been shown to be markedly reduced or even abolished. It is not known whether the reduced incretin effect in T2DM is a primary event leading to T2DM or if it is merely a consequence of the diabetic state. To answer this question the investigators plan to estimate the incretin effect in 8 patients with secondary diabetes mellitus (DM) to chronic pancreatitis (CP) and compare it to the incretin effect of 8 patients with CP and normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Eight patients with T2DM and 8 healthy control subjects are studied for comparison. The incretin effect is measured by a 50-g oral glucose tolerance test and an isoglycemic intravenous glucose infusion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pancreatitis Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis with secondary diabetes mellitus
* Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis with normal glucose tolerance
* Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
* Normal level of hemoglobin
* Normal level of se-creatinine

Exclusion Criteria

* GAD-65 autoantibodies
* ICA autoantibodies
* Albuminuria
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Copenhagen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Diabetes Research Division, Department of Internal Medicine F, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Filip K Knop, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Copenhagen

Jens J Holst, MD DMSc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Copenhagen

Thure Krarup, MD DMSc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Gentofte University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gentofte University Hospital

Hellerup, Copenhagen County, Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KA04034

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.