Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Eval of Neurocognitive Function, Oxidative Damage, and Their Association With Outcomes in METH and Cocaine Abusers. (NCT NCT00628927)
NCT ID: NCT00628927
Last Updated: 2015-12-30
Results Overview
The primary objective of this study was to replicate the finding that performance on the Stroop color-word interference task is predictive of treatment completion in participants with cocaine use disorders (Streeter et al., 2007) and to extend this finding to participants with methamphetamine use disorders. In the Stroop, the participant is required to name the color of the ink in which a word is printed while inhibiting the overlearned response of reading the word (e.g., the word ''red'' might be printed in blue ink). The number of errors were subtracted from the time required (RT; Reaction Time) for each of the 3 trials, yielding three summary scores. The derived interference score is obtained by subtracting the RT for the first trial from the RT for the third trial.
COMPLETED
217 participants
Single study visit
2015-12-30
Participant Flow
As an ancillary study to CTN-0031, six of the nine sites participating in CTN-0031 were chosen to participate in the present study. At the participating sites, participants who were randomized into CTN-0031 were eligible to be screened for the present study. Normal controls were recruited via advertising from one study site.
6 stimulant abusers met at least one exclusion criterion, 3 for a history of stroke and 3 for a history of seizures. 2 of those 6 were incorrectly enrolled into the study. The most common exclusion criteria met by the normal control screeners was having a DSM-IV substance use diagnosis and positive urine toxicology screen.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Simulant Dependent Participants
Stimulant Dependent pts entering treatment who are also enrolled in CTN0031
|
Normal Control Participants
Normal Control participants recruited from the community
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
183
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
175
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
8
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Simulant Dependent Participants
Stimulant Dependent pts entering treatment who are also enrolled in CTN0031
|
Normal Control Participants
Normal Control participants recruited from the community
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Problems performing blood draw
|
6
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Equipment failure
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
An Eval of Neurocognitive Function, Oxidative Damage, and Their Association With Outcomes in METH and Cocaine Abusers.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Simulant Dependent Participants
n=183 Participants
Stimulant Dependent pts entering treatment who are also enrolled in CTN0031
|
Normal Control Participants
n=30 Participants
Normal Control participants recruited from the community
|
Total
n=213 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
183 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
213 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
38.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 • n=5 Participants
|
44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=7 Participants
|
39.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
142 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
183 participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 participants
n=7 Participants
|
213 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Single study visitThe primary objective of this study was to replicate the finding that performance on the Stroop color-word interference task is predictive of treatment completion in participants with cocaine use disorders (Streeter et al., 2007) and to extend this finding to participants with methamphetamine use disorders. In the Stroop, the participant is required to name the color of the ink in which a word is printed while inhibiting the overlearned response of reading the word (e.g., the word ''red'' might be printed in blue ink). The number of errors were subtracted from the time required (RT; Reaction Time) for each of the 3 trials, yielding three summary scores. The derived interference score is obtained by subtracting the RT for the first trial from the RT for the third trial.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Stimulant Dependent Completers
n=130 Participants
Completers were those who attended the first 5 weeks of treatment without missing two or more consecutive weeks; a participant who attended the first 4 weeks of treatment and missed the fifth week was considered a treatment completer if s/he attended treatment during the sixth week
|
Stimulant Dependent Treatment Non-Completers
n=51 Participants
Non-completers were those who failed to attend the first 5 weeks of treatment without missing two or more consecutive weeks; alternately, a participant who attended the first 4 weeks of treatment and missed the fifth week was considered a treatment non-completer if s/he did not attend treatment during the sixth week Data for the two ineligible but enrolled participants was removed from the analysis.
|
Normal Controls
Normal controls recruited from the community.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Color-word Task
|
55.4 seconds
Standard Deviation 22.9
|
50.5 seconds
Standard Deviation 21.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Single study visitThe BIS-11 consists of 30 self-report items, with responses in a four-point Likert-type scale (0 - 3)ranging from "Rarely/Never" to "Almost Always/Always" and comprises three domains: Attentional impulsiveness (AI), Motor impulsiveness (MI), and Non-planning impulsiveness (NP); these three domains are summed to yield a total score; higher scores reflect greater impulsivity. The total score was utilized as the BIS-11 predictor measure (possible score range 0 - 90).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Stimulant Dependent Completers
n=129 Participants
Completers were those who attended the first 5 weeks of treatment without missing two or more consecutive weeks; a participant who attended the first 4 weeks of treatment and missed the fifth week was considered a treatment completer if s/he attended treatment during the sixth week
|
Stimulant Dependent Treatment Non-Completers
n=48 Participants
Non-completers were those who failed to attend the first 5 weeks of treatment without missing two or more consecutive weeks; alternately, a participant who attended the first 4 weeks of treatment and missed the fifth week was considered a treatment non-completer if s/he did not attend treatment during the sixth week Data for the two ineligible but enrolled participants was removed from the analysis.
|
Normal Controls
Normal controls recruited from the community.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Barrett Impulsiveness Scale Version 11 (BIS-11)
|
66.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.3
|
69.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.5
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Single study visitThe test for oxidative damage was derived from a blood sample which was analyzed for tail length from the comet assay; higher scores reflect greater oxidative damage.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Stimulant Dependent Completers
n=127 Participants
Completers were those who attended the first 5 weeks of treatment without missing two or more consecutive weeks; a participant who attended the first 4 weeks of treatment and missed the fifth week was considered a treatment completer if s/he attended treatment during the sixth week
|
Stimulant Dependent Treatment Non-Completers
n=49 Participants
Non-completers were those who failed to attend the first 5 weeks of treatment without missing two or more consecutive weeks; alternately, a participant who attended the first 4 weeks of treatment and missed the fifth week was considered a treatment non-completer if s/he did not attend treatment during the sixth week Data for the two ineligible but enrolled participants was removed from the analysis.
|
Normal Controls
n=30 Participants
Normal controls recruited from the community.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Tail Length From the Comet Assay for Oxidative Damage
|
17.3 µm
Standard Deviation 10.1
|
15.6 µm
Standard Deviation 8.5
|
16.5 µm
Standard Deviation 7.2
|
Adverse Events
Simulant Dependent Participants
Normal Control Participants
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place