A Multi-center Long Term Efficacy Trial of the GFX For Reduction of Glabellar Furrowing
NCT ID: NCT00611273
Last Updated: 2014-06-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
260 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-09-30
2008-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Multi-center Acute Efficacy Trial of GFX For Reduction of Glabellar Furrowing
NCT00612378
Evaluating Procedure Pairing of a Post-Procedure Cream Versus a Comparator in Patients Treated With a Radiofrequency Microneedling for Facial Rejuvenation
NCT06157853
Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines
NCT04249583
Assess Aesthetic Improvement and Onset of QM1114-DP in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines
NCT05146999
Safety and Efficacy of AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines
NCT03736928
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Patients who have presented to the investigator for correction of glabellar furrows, as classified per the Rated Numeric Kinetic Line Scale Score for Facial Wrinkles Secondary to Hyperkinetic Function (Note: Class 1 or Higher)7 (Appendix R) are candidates for this study.
GFX
The GFX system employs minimally invasive technique utilizing Bi-polar (radio frequency) RF technology. GFX ablates nerves activating the muscles that cause glabellar furrowing.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GFX
The GFX system employs minimally invasive technique utilizing Bi-polar (radio frequency) RF technology. GFX ablates nerves activating the muscles that cause glabellar furrowing.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presents for correction of glabellar furrows, as classified per the Rated Numeric Kinetic Line Scale Score for Facial Wrinkles Secondary to Hyperkinetic Function (Class 1 or Higher)
* Is at least 18 years of age
* Signs a written informed consent
* Understands and accepts the obligation to present for scheduled follow-up visits
* Understands that the GFX procedure may not be successful
* Presents at the one month follow-up visit with an improvement from the base line RNKLS score
Exclusion Criteria
* Has had silicone, fat, collagen or a synthetic material placed in the glabellar region or surgical correction or excision of the glabellar furrows
* Has a known bleeding disorder
* Pregnant
* Has received or is anticipated to receive anti-platelets, anti-coagulants, thrombolytics, or cancer therapy
* Is receiving systemic corticosteroids or anabolic steroids (standard doses of inhaled or nasal corticosteroids are acceptable)
* Has a history of chronic or recurrent infection or compromised immune system
* Has severe allergies manifested by a history of anaphylaxis
* Has known lidocaine hypersensitivity
* Is enrolled in another study
* Has history of keloid formation
* The investigator believes the patient is not a suitable candidate for the GFX procedure, or is not likely to receive cosmetic benefitPresents at the one month follow-up visit with no improvement from the base line RNKLS score
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Advanced Cosmetic Intervention
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
James Newman, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Premier Plastic Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Paul S. Nassif, MD, FACS
Beverly Hills, California, United States
James Newman
San Mateo, California, United States
Michael E. Jansin, MD
Tampa, Florida, United States
Foad Nahai, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Steven P. Block, MD
Highland Park, Illinois, United States
Keith LaFerriere, MD
Springfield, Missouri, United States
J. Smythe Rich, III, M.D
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Russell W. Kridel, MD
Houston, Texas, United States
Roger C. Mixter, MD
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
David A. Ellis, MD
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
WIRB 20062119
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ACI 007-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.